On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 17:52 -0400, james wrote:
>
> If you like, elaboration is appreciated.
>
In no particular order:
- MailExtensions change would have broken some of the addons I use to
fix deficiencies in the feature set
- The change to integrated PGP, rather than an addon, means Linux user
On 8/19/20 2:37 PM, james wrote:
> Fellow Thunderbird aficionados:
>
>
> It was release mid July:
>
> https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/07/whats-new-in-thunderbird-78/
>
>
> Any idea where the first 'beta' version can be grabbed, as an ebuild?
>
>
> James
>
There is a mozilla project at ge
Fellow Thunderbird aficionados:
It was release mid July:
https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/07/whats-new-in-thunderbird-78/
Any idea where the first 'beta' version can be grabbed, as an ebuild?
James
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:37:30 -0400, james wrote:
> It was release mid July:
>
> https://blog.thunderbird.net/2020/07/whats-new-in-thunderbird-78/
>
>
> Any idea where the first 'beta' version can be grabbed, as an ebuild?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/733062
"Mozilla Thunderbird 78.0 is now availab
On 8/19/20 4:22 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 15:41 -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
(there are A LOT of changes)
At the risk of derailing the thread, I moved to using Evolution because
of the T-Bird v78 changes.
If you like, elaboration is appreciated.
James
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 15:41 -0400, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> (there are A LOT of changes)
At the risk of derailing the thread, I moved to using Evolution because
of the T-Bird v78 changes.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 7:10 PM, Grant Taylor
wrote:
> Per protocol specification, SMTP is EXTREMELY robust.
>
> It will retry delivery, nominally once an hour, for up to five (or
> seven) days. That's 120-168 delivery attempts.
>
> Further, SMTP implementa
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 12:25 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> I don't think you fully understand Grant's point. Whilst HTTP(/2) may be more
> featureful for serving web pages, it makes absolutely no sense to use for
> anything but. Protocol age absolutely is not i
On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 14:37 -0400, james wrote:
>
> Any idea where the first 'beta' version can be grabbed, as an ebuild?
>
Doesn't seem to be one available, yet.
https://gpo.zugaina.org/mail-client/thunderbird
Greetings,
after a routine upgrade from Fvwm version 2.6.5-r3 to version 2.6.9 I'm
missing file "/usr/share/man/man1/fvwm1.bz2". Several other Fvwm manual
pages are there, but I can't tell whether or not "fvwm1.bz2" is the only
one missing. Does anybody know what's happened to "fvwm1.bz2"?
Sin
First, well said.
On 8/19/20 2:27 AM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Apologies for my unintended verbosity. My subconscious _really_
wanted to point out that SMTP is (generally) RELIABLE. ;-)
Second, this is an understatement.
Per protocol specification, SMTP is EXTREMELY robust.
It will retry delivery
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:44 PM Grant Edwards
wrote:
>
> How are the AMD "Wraith Stealth" fans? I've been using the fan that
> came with the old Core-i3, and it gets a little annoying when it's
> time to compile chromium (or when flying planes/helicopters).
I have two Ryzen processors with thes
Dale wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> For several decades, I was a loyal AMD customer. But the last time I
>> upgraded my home desktop (2013), AMD just didn't seem to have anything
>> that could complete with the Core-i3/5 CPUs with integrated graphics.
>> The Intel HD-2500 GPU was plenty fast eno
Grant Edwards wrote:
> For several decades, I was a loyal AMD customer. But the last time I
> upgraded my home desktop (2013), AMD just didn't seem to have anything
> that could complete with the Core-i3/5 CPUs with integrated graphics.
> The Intel HD-2500 GPU was plenty fast enough for everything
On 19/08/2020 04:44, Grant Edwards wrote:
How are the AMD "Wraith Stealth" fans? I've been using the fan that
came with the old Core-i3, and it gets a little annoying when it's
time to compile chromium (or when flying planes/helicopters).
If you're talking about what I think you are, I'm build
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:25:11AM +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> reliable method of reliably transferring
Apologies for my unintended verbosity. My subconscious _really_ wanted to point
out that SMTP is (generally) RELIABLE. ;-)
--
Ashley Dixon
suugaku.co.uk
2A9A 4117
DA96 D18A
8A7B B0D2
A30E B
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:34:46AM +, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> sure, smtp is older, but protocol age is
> irrelevant.
>
> right now http/2 is more developed and much more
> efficient (e.g. compressed binary, pipelining,
> single connection multiplexing, encryption by
> default). even htt
17 matches
Mail list logo
