Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 05:57, james wrote: > Can't locate inc/Module/Install.pm in @INC (you may need to install the > inc::Module::Install module) (@INC contains: /etc/perl > /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.30.1/x86_64-linux-thread-multi > /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.30.1 > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.3

Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread james
On 1/26/20 7:06 PM, Mick wrote: On Sunday, 26 January 2020 23:45:14 GMT james wrote: On 1/26/20 3:58 AM, Mick wrote: On Sunday, 26 January 2020 08:36:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: On Sunday, 26 January 2020 05:35:04 GMT Dale wrote: james wrote: just a test via another mail-route. curious if i

Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread Mick
On Sunday, 26 January 2020 23:45:14 GMT james wrote: > On 1/26/20 3:58 AM, Mick wrote: > > On Sunday, 26 January 2020 08:36:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> On Sunday, 26 January 2020 05:35:04 GMT Dale wrote: > >>> james wrote: > just a test via another mail-route. curious if it works > >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread james
On 1/26/20 3:58 AM, Mick wrote: On Sunday, 26 January 2020 08:36:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: On Sunday, 26 January 2020 05:35:04 GMT Dale wrote: james wrote: just a test via another mail-route. curious if it works FYI, it came through but the threading was broken. It appeared here as a new

Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread Mick
On Sunday, 26 January 2020 08:36:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday, 26 January 2020 05:35:04 GMT Dale wrote: > > james wrote: > > > just a test via another mail-route. curious if it works > > > > FYI, it came through but the threading was broken. It appeared here as > > a new thread. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] python 2 deprecation

2020-01-26 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday, 26 January 2020 05:35:04 GMT Dale wrote: > james wrote: > > just a test via another mail-route. curious if it works > > FYI, it came through but the threading was broken. It appeared here as > a new thread. Not so here. KMail threaded it right. -- Regards, Peter.