On Friday, 22 March 2019 15:22:48 GMT Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-03-22, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think,
>
> Wow, that triggers a flashback!
Glad to be of service :)
Thanks all for the advice.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On 2019-03-22, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think,
Wow, that triggers a flashback! My first Linux install was Yggdrasil,
and it took _hours_ to boot. The smartasses at Yggdrasil insisted on
trying to play an audio clip that said something like "Welcome to
Yggdra
On 3/22/19 10:46 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think, the received wisdom was that
> enabling kernel module loading was a bad idea because an attacker might be
> able to load malicious software directly into the kernel. No modules --> one
> mo
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:46:20 + Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think, the received wisdom was that
> enabling kernel module loading was a bad idea because an attacker might be
> able to load malicious software directly into the kernel. No modules
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:46 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think, the received wisdom was that
> enabling kernel module loading was a bad idea because an attacker might be
> able to load malicious software directly into the kernel. No modules --> one
> more at
Hello list,
Years ago, in the days of Yggdrasil I think, the received wisdom was that
enabling kernel module loading was a bad idea because an attacker might be
able to load malicious software directly into the kernel. No modules --> one
more attack route closed.
What is the current thinking o
6 matches
Mail list logo
