On 08/16/2016 04:43 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to install llvm for days. But all versions fail with the
> error message "internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)".
>
> The last lines in the build log.
>
> [1820/2304] /usr/lib64/ccache/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
On 16/08/2016 18:40, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 16 Aug 2016 16:58:20 hw wrote:
>>
>>> The messages are cryptic, and you have to guess what they are trying to
>>> tell you.
>>
>> *Guess?* Good God, man. You don't guess - you use yo
On 16/08/2016 20:04, Mick wrote:
> The longest I've taken to update a server was around 6 months - I was
> planning
> to retire it, but plans changed. If anything it tested my memory, because I
> came across each and every problem I had come across when I was updating my
> other systems in the
On 16/08/2016 19:14, Willie M wrote:
> On 08/16/2016 03:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 16/08/2016 02:24, james wrote:
>>>
Please post the output of layman -l
>>> alunduil
>>> java
>>> pentoo
>>> science
>>> sunrise
>>> torbrower
>>> ultrabug
>>> xmw
>>
>>
>> That's what I thought. I reckon
Hello,
I'm trying to install llvm for days. But all versions fail with the
error message "internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)".
The last lines in the build log.
[1820/2304] /usr/lib64/ccache/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT
-DCLANG_ENABLE_OBJC_REWRITER -DCLANG_EN
On 08/16/2016 02:49 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On 08/15/2016 06:02 PM, james wrote:
Well,
I brought this up before. No need for argument, just test it out
for yourself.
Multiple times (over the last few weeks) I have run 'emerge -uDNvp @world' and
there are issues to deal with manually.
On 08/15/2016 06:02 PM, james wrote:
> Well,
>
> I brought this up before. No need for argument, just test it out
> for yourself.
>
> Multiple times (over the last few weeks) I have run 'emerge -uDNvp @world'
> and there are issues to deal with manually.
>
> For example 'One or more updates/re
On 08/16/2016 10:58 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Three months is not "ridiculously outdated", yet the update doesn´t work.
> 1.5 years isn´t "ridiculously outdated", either --- maybe a bit old, but
> what´s the problem?
>
>> Of course, you'll have to deal with new/renamed/moved/gone packages
>> and such stu
On Tuesday 16 Aug 2016 12:24:40 Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:19:27 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > > My workstation updates on a cron job every day at 6PM. I check my email
> > > in
> > > the morning to see if it ran into a
On 08/16/2016 03:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/08/2016 02:24, james wrote:
>>
>>> Please post the output of layman -l
>> alunduil
>> java
>> pentoo
>> science
>> sunrise
>> torbrower
>> ultrabug
>> xmw
>
>
> That's what I thought. I reckon I know what your problem is.
>
>
>
And the prob
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 Aug 2016 16:58:20 hw wrote:
>
>> The messages are cryptic, and you have to guess what they are trying to
>> tell you.
>
> *Guess?* Good God, man. You don't guess - you use your experience and your
> logical reasoning to deduce
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 11:19:27 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > My workstation updates on a cron job every day at 6PM. I check my email in
> > the morning to see if it ran into any trouble, correct whatever it
> > complained about, and let it
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:29:45 +0200, hw wrote:
> >> About 1.5 years --- not really a long time.
> >
> > You're kidding, right? You're running a production server without the
> > last 18 months' worth of security updates?
>
> What can you do when you don´t have the time to do the updates,
On a
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:58:20 +0200, hw wrote:
> Perhaps you can do that when you´re an expert user of the packagage
> management and have lots of time on your hands. I just need to update.
This is what makes us think Gentoo is not the right choice for you.
> It would already be much easier if e
On Tuesday 16 Aug 2016 16:58:20 hw wrote:
> Three months is not "ridiculously outdated", yet the update doesn´t work.
Three months *is* a dangerously long time to leave a Gentoo system, whether
you like it or not, and just asking for trouble. Eighteen months is worse
than ridiculous - it's impo
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> My workstation updates on a cron job every day at 6PM. I check my email in the
> morning to see if it ran into any trouble, correct whatever it complained
> about, and let it try again the next evening.
>
I think you're better-off building
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 04:29:45 PM hw wrote:
> Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:26:21 +0200, hw wrote:
> >>> If you see this now, your production server hasn't been updated for a
> >>> long time...
> >>
> >> About 1.5 years --- not really a long time.
> >
> > You're kidding,
james schrieb:
On 08/10/2016 06:54 AM, hw wrote:
Hi,
I´m trying to upgrade portage because I´m getting a message that it
needs to be able to work with EAPI 6 packages and can only do EAPI 5.
I´m running into merge conflicts when trying to update portage, and
apparently one of the packages (de
David Haller schrieb:
Hello,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 12:54:37 schrieb hw:
I?m trying to upgrade portage because I?m getting a message that it
needs to be able to work with EAPI 6 packages and can only do EAPI 5.
[..]
If you see this now, yo
On 08/16/2016 07:29 AM, hw wrote:
> Neil Bothwick schrieb:
>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:26:21 +0200, hw wrote:
>>
If you see this now, your production server hasn't been updated for a
long time...
>>>
>>> About 1.5 years --- not really a long time.
>>
>> You're kidding, right? You're running
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:26:21 +0200, hw wrote:
If you see this now, your production server hasn't been updated for a
long time...
About 1.5 years --- not really a long time.
You're kidding, right? You're running a production server without the
last 18 months' worth of
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Every three months is not infrequently.
>
>...
>
> Seriously, update every day?
>
As Neil has mentioned, there seems to be a mismatch in expectations.
Every day updates are probably fairly typical for Gentoo users. I
don't update all my containers e
On 08/15/2016 09:43 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:02:27PM -0400, james wrote
What response do you get with...
emerge --backtrack=30 -pvuDt @world
Note that I've included "pv" to turn it into a "dummy run" with
verbose output.
" # emerge --backtrack=30 -pvuD
On 16/08/2016 14:13, hw wrote:
> So after all, Gentoo seemed the least-bad choice with some arguments for
> it.
> Now it turns out that you can´t update it without running into problems all
> the time, and currently not at all.
No, that is absolutely not true.
You have to understand that you mus
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:13:38 +0200, hw wrote:
> Since someone said I should use the same python target for everything,
> I set one globally. Why wouldn´t that target be used?
It will, unless overridden per-package, but existing software will still
be installed with the old settings.
> Even if
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:13:16 +0200, hw wrote:
> > You're probably always running into problems like this because you
> > infrequently update Gentoo.
>
> Every three months is not infrequently.
It is considered so for Gentoo.
> > If you ran it every day you'd probably only run into issues eve
Rich Freeman schrieb:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:08 AM, hw wrote:
I infrequently update Gentoo because I´m *always* running into problems
like this. 'Infrequently' means about every 3 months at home, and not
since, IIRC, 2015-02 here at work. The last update at home got stalled
because perl
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:23 AM, hw wrote:
> Neil Bothwick schrieb:
>>
>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:08:34 +0200, hw wrote:
>>
>>> infrequently update Gentoo because I´m *always* running into problems
>>> like this.
>>
>> Every time, or is that just hyperbole?
>
> every time
Keep in mind that your
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:08:34 +0200, hw wrote:
infrequently update Gentoo because I´m *always* running into problems
like this.
Every time, or is that just hyperbole?
every time
'Infrequently' means about every 3 months at home, and not
since, IIRC, 2015-02 here
Fernando Rodriguez schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/13/2016 09:40 AM, hw wrote:
Fernando Rodriguez schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/2016 08:44 AM, Jeroen Mathon wrote:
Is it perhaps an idea to mask the gentoolkit package when upd
On 16/08/2016 02:24, james wrote:
>
>> Please post the output of layman -l
> alunduil
> java
> pentoo
> science
> sunrise
> torbrower
> ultrabug
> xmw
That's what I thought. I reckon I know what your problem is.
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com
31 matches
Mail list logo
