On Sunday 14 August 2016, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 08/14/2016 05:12 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
> > 'layman -L' finds no kde-sunset.
>
> I had that problem too, it's not listed there.
>
> If you want to use it, create /etc/portage/repos.conf/kde-sunset.conf
> with these contents:
>
> [kde-sunset]
> a
On 08/14/2016 05:12 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
> 'layman -L' finds no kde-sunset.
>
I had that problem too, it's not listed there.
If you want to use it, create /etc/portage/repos.conf/kde-sunset.conf
with these contents:
[kde-sunset]
auto-sync = yes
location = /var/local/overlays/kde-sunset
maste
On 08/13/2016 10:09 AM, hw wrote:
>>
>> Not the whole system, only portage. It should still be your last resort,
>> but on the bad-idea scale it's only a 1 or a 2.
>
> And how would I know which of all the files affect only portage and nothing
> else, and what about the dependencies of portage?
>
On Sunday 14 Aug 2016 19:12:43 Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Sunday 14 August 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Well, either you can try it to see what happens, maybe putting it back
> > afterwards, or you can remove that line from the ebuild - again,
> > temporarily. Or try the kde-sunset overlay as Dan
On 14/08/2016 13:45, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Hey, just curious about something:
>
> How is genkernel's "default" kernel config maintained? Is it fixed, or
> is it maintained as a diff against upstream, or what?
it's mysterious magic
>
> I'm curious because I'm considering if I should just go
Hello,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
>Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 12:54:37 schrieb hw:
>> I?m trying to upgrade portage because I?m getting a message that it
>> needs to be able to work with EAPI 6 packages and can only do EAPI 5.
[..]
>If you see this now, your production server
On Sunday 14 August 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 13 Aug 2016 22:54:19 Robin Atwood wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 August 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > On Saturday 13 Aug 2016 20:56:50 Robin Atwood wrote:
> > > > And the next problem:
> > > >
> > > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
>
Hey, just curious about something:
How is genkernel's "default" kernel config maintained? Is it fixed, or is
it maintained as a diff against upstream, or what?
I'm curious because I'm considering if I should just go straight to the
kernel's own built in defaults.
I know a lot of it sets up most
On Saturday 13 Aug 2016 22:54:19 Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Saturday 13 August 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 13 Aug 2016 20:56:50 Robin Atwood wrote:
> > > And the next problem:
> > >
> > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
> > > "kde-plasma/plasma-workspace-wallpapers:5" have been ma
9 matches
Mail list logo
