On 23/04/16 03:33, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:38:00 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I upgraded thunderbird-bin from 38.7.0 to 45.0 and all window fonts
became extremely washed-out, thin and generally unreadable. I then wiped
the configuration files (mv ~/.thunderbird ~/tb_b
On 04/23/2016 09:53 AM, Corbin wrote:
>
> If it is font problems ... Mozilla is using a lot of MS TTF fonts.
>
> Three font packages to try ...
>
> # 1 "media-fonts/corefonts"
> ( MS TTF fonts )
>
> # 2 "media-fonts/liberation-fonts"
> ( known to fix CUPS printing from Firefox problems )
>
> #
On 04/22/2016 08:11 PM, wabe wrote:
Corbin wrote:
On 04/22/2016 07:33 PM, Holger Hoffst�tte wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:38:00 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I upgraded thunderbird-bin from 38.7.0 to 45.0 and all window fonts
became extremely washed-out, thin and generally unreadable. I
On 04/23/2016 10:42 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Has it become entirely impossible to share a directory tree and the
> files in it with multiple users when Linux is involved? This should be
> a very simple thing to accomplish.
>
It was never possible. It's ridiculous, but there it is. The UNIX
permissio
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:42:56 +0200, hw wrote:
> > I've done this with ACLs in the past, which is why I suggested it, but
> > it's a pain to set up if you haven't used them before. Alan's
> > suggestion of using inotify is probably simplest. Install incrond and
> > put something like this in a file
hw schrieb:
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
every file ev
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:38:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
umask is just not viable either, as a) it's global and affects all
files a user creates and b) by definition umask is modifiable by the
user (it's a feature to help users out so they don't need to chmod
every file ev
8 matches
Mail list logo
