On 17/09/2015 08:45, Stroller wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 September 2015, at 7:22 am, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> Their latest printers do not make that same
>> stupid mistake; mine is a recent colour laser and the cheapest in the
>> range. Doesn't even have a display or keyboard so it creates it's o
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 17/09/2015 05:38, james wrote:
>>> 150914 Mobo : Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P 970+SB950 DDR3 2000 : 119.99
2x PCI-Express x16 GLAN 6xSATA 6.0 Gb/s 4xUSB 3.0 14xUSB 2.0
>> I have (3) of the Ggiabyte 990A-UD3P mobos:: I love mine
>>
>> Very extensive wiring n
On Wed, 16 September 2015, at 7:22 am, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> Their latest printers do not make that same
> stupid mistake; mine is a recent colour laser and the cheapest in the
> range. Doesn't even have a display or keyboard so it creates it's own
> ad-hoc wifi connection so you can connect a
On 17/09/2015 05:38, james wrote:
>> 150914 Mobo : Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P 970+SB950 DDR3 2000 : 119.99
>> > 2x PCI-Express x16 GLAN 6xSATA 6.0 Gb/s 4xUSB 3.0 14xUSB 2.0
> I have (3) of the Ggiabyte 990A-UD3P mobos:: I love mine
>
> Very extensive wiring needs, plus you have to mat
On Thursday 17 Sep 2015 02:11:44 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up
> > in cups, on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this
> > one does *not* have the hpijs USE set.
> >
> > Could som
On Thursday 17 Sep 2015 01:45:14 walt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:22:32 +0100
>
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up
> > in cups, on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this
> > one does *not* have the hpijs U
On Wednesday 16 Sep 2015 23:43:51 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up in
> > cups, on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this one
> > does *not* have the hpijs USE set.
> >
> > Could someone who also
On Wednesday 16 Sep 2015 15:51:55 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:19:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" ==>
> > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/var/lib/layman"
> >
> > No. DoItRite as above. That PORTDIR_OVERLAY crap never did work right -
> > all overlays
On 17/09/15 06:04, Philip Webb wrote:
My previous machines' (2000/3/7/12) cases all contained a PSU,
but it seems I now have to buy case/PSU separately, so my next question is
whether I can safely use the case + power supply from the 2007 machine
This should be fine, as long as the PSU has SATA
On 15/09/15 12:21, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
On 15.09.2015 08:49, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I will retry a build and show you parts of the log.
Something in my merging history seems to have solved it now.
Merged OK today, sorry for the noise.
I'd run a complete memtest just in case. Las
Philip Webb ca.inter.net> writes:
> 150914 CPU : AMD X8 FX8370E 8-core 4,3 GHz 16 MB 32 nm 95 W
I have 3) FX8350. Outstanding performance for the cost. Love them all.
> 150914 Mobo : Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P 970+SB950 DDR3 2000 : 119.99
> 2x PCI-Express x16 GLAN 6xSATA 6.0
Philip Webb wrote:
> Thanks for the 2 replies to my previous query (hijacked by overclockers).
>
> I have bought (prices in CAD) :
>
> 150914 CPU : AMD X8 FX8370E 8-core 4,3 GHz 16 MB 32 nm 95 W : 259.00
> Direct replacement : 3 yr : 38.85
> 150914 Mob
Thanks for the 2 replies to my previous query (hijacked by overclockers).
I have bought (prices in CAD) :
150914 CPU : AMD X8 FX8370E 8-core 4,3 GHz 16 MB 32 nm 95 W : 259.00
Direct replacement : 3 yr : 38.85
150914 Mobo : Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P 970+S
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up
> in cups, on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this
> one does *not* have the hpijs USE set.
>
> Could someone who also does not have hpijs set in their hplip tell me
> if the HP D
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:22:32 +0100
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up
> in cups, on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this
> one does *not* have the hpijs USE set.
>
> Could someone who also does not have hpijs set i
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up in cups,
> on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this one does *not*
> have the hpijs USE set.
>
> Could someone who also does not have hpijs set in their hplip tell me if the
> HP De
Hi All,
I just noticed that the driver for my old printer no longer shows up in cups,
on one of my PCs. Comparison with other PCs shows that this one does *not*
have the hpijs USE set.
Could someone who also does not have hpijs set in their hplip tell me if the
HP DeskJet 930C selection is mi
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/09/2015 21:42, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It has something to do with systemd's log thingy.
>>>
>>> The error only appears in one place in the syslog-ng source,
>>> in modu
On 16/09/2015 21:42, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>>
>> It has something to do with systemd's log thingy.
>>
>> The error only appears in one place in the syslog-ng source,
>> in modules/systemd-journal/journal-reader.c:
>>
>> static inline gboole
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> It has something to do with systemd's log thingy.
>
> The error only appears in one place in the syslog-ng source,
> in modules/systemd-journal/journal-reader.c:
>
> static inline gboolean
> __seek_to_saved_state(JournalReader *self)
> {
>
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 3:05:55 PM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 8:52:21 PM Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 09/16/2015 06:55:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On 16/09/2015 17:57, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > > I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
> > > > Sys
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 8:52:21 PM Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 06:55:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 16/09/2015 17:57, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
> > > Syslog-ng fails to start with the message:
> > > Failed to seek to the Cursor curso
On 16/09/2015 20:52, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 06:55:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 16/09/2015 17:57, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>> I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
>>> Syslog-ng fails to start with the message:
>>> Failed to seek to the Cursor cursor='', error='Success (0)'
>>>
On 09/16/2015 06:55:00 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/09/2015 17:57, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
> > Syslog-ng fails to start with the message:
> > Failed to seek to the Cursor cursor='', error='Success (0)'
> >
> > Does anybody know what's happening?
> >
> >
On 16/09/2015 17:57, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
> Syslog-ng fails to start with the message:
> Failed to seek to the Cursor cursor='', error='Success (0)'
>
> Does anybody know what's happening?
>
> Many thanks for a hint,
> Helmut
>
>
It has something to
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:07:55 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > What is emaint -- I don't see it in the tree.
>
> That's because it's part of portage, an essential part now as syncing
> won't work without it so you already have it installed.
OK, thanks.
--
Your
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:07:55 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> What is emaint -- I don't see it in the tree.
That's because it's part of portage, an essential part now as syncing
won't work without it so you already have it installed.
--
Neil Bothwick
Procedure: (n.) a method of performin
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've been playing with emaint and on one box I got an error message:
>
> # emaint -C logs
>
> PORT_LOGDIR_CLEAN command returned None
> See the make.conf(5) man page for PORT_LOGDIR_CLEAN usage instructions.
>
> This is needlessly complex. In fact all I
I have syslog-ng-3.7.1 installed here.
Syslog-ng fails to start with the message:
Failed to seek to the Cursor cursor='', error='Success (0)'
Does anybody know what's happening?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:19:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" ==>
> > PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/var/lib/layman"
>
> No. DoItRite as above. That PORTDIR_OVERLAY crap never did work right -
> all overlays were essentially considered equal and it would be pot luck
> whe
On 2015-09-16, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 06:57:36 PM Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2015-09-15, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> > In most X11 apps I can select some text and then paste it somewhere
>> > else with a middle-click, or dump it to stdout with the command 'xclip
>> > -o'
On 16/09/2015 15:46, james wrote:
> Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
>
>
>
>>> Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
>>> The tree and all overlays are portage:portage
>
>> Just to add some confusion to the mix
>
>
>
> Good example and it got me thinking
>
>> So some are portage:po
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
> > The tree and all overlays are portage:portage
> Just to add some confusion to the mix
Good example and it got me thinking
> So some are portage:portage, some are root:root - all use /var/portage
> for $
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 06:57:36 PM Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-09-15, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > In most X11 apps I can select some text and then paste it somewhere
> > else with a middle-click, or dump it to stdout with the command 'xclip
> > -o'. That doesn't work for highligted text i
Hello list,
I've been playing with emaint and on one box I got an error message:
# emaint -C logs
PORT_LOGDIR_CLEAN command returned None
See the make.conf(5) man page for PORT_LOGDIR_CLEAN usage instructions.
This is needlessly complex. In fact all I needed was for PORT_LOGDIR to be
defined i
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:25:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > That got me thinking. Everywhere that portage operates or owns
> > things, should the ownership not be portage.portage
> > and what would the typical permissions be?
>
> Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
> The tree and all overla
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 8:01:56 AM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/09/2015 00:36, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 10:25:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> On 15/09/2015 22:09, james wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> So looking at /etc/portage/repos.conf, it seems root.
37 matches
Mail list logo
