On 09/06/2015 10:39 PM, David Haller wrote:
>
> Can anyone reproduce this problem? I did not have _any_ haskell
> package installed so far.
>
> Should I open a bug? Or just wait a couple of days, sync, and try
> again without the masks?
Yes please open a bug.
>
> PS: does haskell have no dyna
Hello all,
could it be, that the dev-haskell stack deps are broken/out-of-sync?
I tried to emerge pandoc today, which pulled in haskell, and I got
lots of breakages. The tree is freshly synced. Anyway, I finally got
it solved by masking:
# grep haskell /etc/portage/* 2>/dev/null
/etc/portage/pac
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 6:14:52 PM the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> Thelma
>
> On 09/06/2015 01:40 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> [snip]
> >> Though, I can not "manifest" the ebuild it can not be found:
> > nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64.tar.gz
> >> ebuild /usr/local/portage/net-misc/nxclient/n
On 09/06/2015 01:40 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Layman -L
>> doesn't list it either
>
> That's normal because it's not a layman managed overlay. Just make sure to
> list it on your repos.conf. When you emerge it with the -v option it should
> show your overlay name instead of gent
Thelma
On 09/06/2015 01:40 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
[snip]
>> Though, I can not "manifest" the ebuild it can not be found:
> nxclient-3.5.0-7.x86_64.tar.gz
>> ebuild /usr/local/portage/net-misc/nxclient/nxclient-3.5.0.7.ebuild manifest
>
> Change the SRC_URI variable on the ebuild to poin
> But I have a feeling I'd soon be in big trouble if I did. Is this
> something that only gentoo devs should be messing with, or is this
> a project that a typical gentoo end-user might hope to accomplish
> without frequent suicidal thoughts?
In most cases hardened just works.
You may/will run
On 09/06/2015 04:15 PM, walt wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Gentoo
>
> That wiki page is very seductive. It makes me want to drop everything
> and select a hardened profile and re-emerge everything from scratch.
>
> But I have a feeling I'd soon be in big trouble if I did. Is th
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 1:15:17 PM walt wrote:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Gentoo
>
> That wiki page is very seductive. It makes me want to drop everything
> and select a hardened profile and re-emerge everything from scratch.
>
> But I have a feeling I'd soon be in big trouble
Hello walt,
I've running hardened (hardened profile + kernel (including pax and grsec)) for
at least 5 years on all my boxes except one (my gaming only box).
It's been quite a while that I had an issue caused by the hardened profile that
wasn't due to my fiddeling around with stuff like SELinux an
walt gmail.com> writes:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Gentoo
> That wiki page is very seductive. It makes me want to drop everything
> and select a hardened profile and re-emerge everything from scratch.
Blueness has some interesting builds that might be worth taking for
a test driv
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened_Gentoo
That wiki page is very seductive. It makes me want to drop everything
and select a hardened profile and re-emerge everything from scratch.
But I have a feeling I'd soon be in big trouble if I did. Is this
something that only gentoo devs should be mes
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 3:40:52 PM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sunday, September 06, 2015 12:21:13 PM the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >
> > On 09/05/2015 03:19 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >>>
> > >>> I was right that rebuilding libtiff (not perl-cleaner) will get you
pas
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 12:21:13 PM the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2015 03:19 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> [snip]
> >>>
> >>> I was right that rebuilding libtiff (not perl-cleaner) will get you past
> > that
> >>> ebuild, but my advice was the same you just received, go back
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 4:29:25 PM lee wrote:
> Mick writes:
>
> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 17:22:24 lee wrote:
> >> Mick writes:
> >> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 02:08:47 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >> >> On Saturday, September 05, 2015 1:05:06 AM lee wrote:
> >> >> > In this case, I happen
On Sunday, September 06, 2015 3:03:12 PM lee wrote:
> Fernando Rodriguez writes:
>
> > On Saturday, September 05, 2015 6:09:36 PM Mick wrote:
> >> On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote:
> >> > Fernando Rodriguez writes:
> >> > > On Saturday, September 05, 2015 1:05:06 AM lee wrote:
> >> > >
On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 15:29:25 lee wrote:
> Mick writes:
> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 17:22:24 lee wrote:
> >> Maybe that only works with firefox?
> >
> > Yes, it seems to be the case that SeaMonkey has some GUI differences to
> > Firefox. I am on Firefox-38.2.1 at present.
>
> Does Firefox eve
On 09/05/2015 03:19 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> I was right that rebuilding libtiff (not perl-cleaner) will get you past
> that
>>> ebuild, but my advice was the same you just received, go back to the *VERY
>>> FIRST* post on the subject and fix the root of the problem. You wil
On Sunday 06 Sep 2015 03:45:26 lee wrote:
> Mick writes:
> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote:
> >> What's the solution for a server which can be reached by different fqdns
> >> and IPs? What if the fqdns and IPs it can be reached by change over the
> >> lifetime of the certificates?
>
Mick writes:
> On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote:
>> Fernando Rodriguez writes:
>> > On Saturday, September 05, 2015 1:05:06 AM lee wrote:
>> >> In this case, I happen to have full physical access to the server and
>> >> thus to the certificate stored on it. This is not the case for, l
Fernando Rodriguez writes:
> On Saturday, September 05, 2015 6:09:36 PM Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 14:06:27 lee wrote:
>> > Fernando Rodriguez writes:
>> > > On Saturday, September 05, 2015 1:05:06 AM lee wrote:
>> > >> In this case, I happen to have full physical access to the serve
Mick writes:
> On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 22:40:09 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> Since it lets you open the exception dialog but just hangs when downloading
>> the certificate I wonder if it has something to do with your OCSP settings.
>> Check that they match mine:
>>
>> security.OCSP.GET.enabl
Mick writes:
> On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 17:22:24 lee wrote:
>> Mick writes:
>> > On Saturday 05 Sep 2015 02:08:47 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>> >> On Saturday, September 05, 2015 1:05:06 AM lee wrote:
>> >> > In this case, I happen to have full physical access to the server and
>> >> > thus to the
22 matches
Mail list logo
