I use the Seamonkey variant on ICEWM, so I don't think it's specific
to your setup.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:52:21PM +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote
> So my question, I suppose, is multipart:
>
> 1) Is this by design? Is this the normal behaviour?
I get the same behaviour.
> 2) Have I set
Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've been using Firefox for ages and something struck me recently as a
> bit odd. In the Windows version, if I click up into the address or
> search boxes, the existing contents are highlighted and if I begin
> typing, the existing text is deleted and what I'm t
Hi all,
I've been using Firefox for ages and something struck me recently as a
bit odd. In the Windows version, if I click up into the address or
search boxes, the existing contents are highlighted and if I begin
typing, the existing text is deleted and what I'm typing becomes the
contents.
2015-05-16 17:12 GMT+03:00 Rich Freeman :
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz wrote:
>>
>> I am inattentive today. :(
>>
>> Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system.
>>...
>> [blocks b ] > (">...
>> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>
>
> This is
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:53 AM, gevisz wrote:
>
> I am inattentive today. :(
>
> Some blockers remained but I hope it will not broke the system.
>...
> [blocks b ] ("...
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>
This is pretty normal for a qt upgrade. You haven't updated this
2015-05-16 15:50 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
> On 16/05/2015 09:51, gevisz wrote:
>> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
>>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 May
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 07:16:58 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Well, it can be a lot more than two screens of text. I have 1300
>> lines of package.use, almost all of it for abi_x86_32. I suspect that
>> this the result of stuff like steam,
2015-05-16 11:26 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
>> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
>>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 May 2015 0
On 16/05/2015 09:51, gevisz wrote:
> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
>>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury
> wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 07:16:58 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Unless your screen is IMAX-sized, two screens of text is a lot more
> > lightfooted than add extra libraries to nearly 200 packages - and most
> > of that text is comments anyway.
> >
>
> Well, it can be a lot more than two screens of
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
>
>> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
>> > rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
>> > need to. The granular approach suits me
On Sat, 16 May 2015 11:52:48 +0100, Mick wrote:
> PS. I'm waiting for Neil's uncanny signature which if it works
> correctly it should come with something like: "Nostalgia, it's not
> what it used to be" LOL!
You can't force these things, it's not uncanny if it's deliberate.
--
Neil Bothwick
On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:40:01 gevisz wrote:
> 2015-05-16 13:20 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick :
> > As Mick says, you get to choose, but the per-package approach is
> > definitely lighter on the system. Enabling it globally may be less work
> > though. I say "may" because when I tried that it introduc
2015-05-16 13:33 GMT+03:00 Mick :
> On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:10:21 gevisz wrote:
>> 2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick :
>
>> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather
>> > did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't need to.
>> > The granular approa
2015-05-16 13:20 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick :
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
>
>> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
>> > rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
>> > need to. The granular approach suits me better and a
On Saturday 16 May 2015 11:10:21 gevisz wrote:
> 2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick :
> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would rather
> > did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't need to.
> > The granular approach suits me better and also aligns bette
On Sat, 16 May 2015 13:10:21 +0300, gevisz wrote:
> > I'm afraid I cannot agree with you on this. On older PCs I would
> > rather did not have to install abi_x86_32 for packages that I don't
> > need to. The granular approach suits me better and also aligns
> > better with the light-footed Gento
2015-05-16 13:10 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick :
>> On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
>>> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
>>
>>> >So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
>>> >globally and try to update the world once more.
2015-05-16 11:55 GMT+03:00 Mick :
> On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
>> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
>
>> >So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
>> >globally and try to update the world once more.
>>
>> Lukily, this approach worked out. Cu
On Saturday 16 May 2015 09:26:14 gevisz wrote:
> 2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> >So, if I get no better suggestions, I will enable abi_x86_32
> >globally and try to update the world once more.
>
> Lukily, this approach worked out. Currently I am updating and recompil
On Saturday 16 May 2015 08:54:00 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 16/05/2015 09:50, Mick wrote:
> > On a no-multilib machine I have arrived on a circular argument:
> > ==
> > # emerge -uaDv world
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merg
2015-05-16 10:51 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
>> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
>>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury
> wrote:
On 16/05/2015 09:50, Mick wrote:
> On a no-multilib machine I have arrived on a circular argument:
> ==
> # emerge -uaDv world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> 390_32(-
2015-05-16 9:44 GMT+03:00 Alan McKinnon :
> On 16/05/2015 07:52, gevisz wrote:
>> 2015-05-15 20:30 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Gevisz wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:45:35 -0400 Gregory Woodbury
wrote:
> I had a similar problem with som
On a no-multilib machine I have arrived on a circular argument:
==
# emerge -uaDv world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]".
!!! One of the following pack
25 matches
Mail list logo
