On 04/05/2015 20:42, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Greetings gents.
>
> I may have missed it, but i haven't seen this suggested yet: RAID+LVM.
> If you already have a 3TB drive, buy another (or two more) and build a
> RAID1 or 5 array on them. Then build your LVM on top of /dev/md0 (or
> whatever device
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:23:55AM -0500, Dale wrote
> Dale wrote:
>
> Well, I read replies a few times and I think it is best to just add a
> new drive. Heck, I've already had a 3TB drive to fail. Anyway, I also
> need to look into some sort of backup system. I used to do this with
> DVDs but
On Monday, May 04, 2015 4:36:08 PM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Monday, May 04, 2015 3:41:54 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Why is seamonkey the only program (so far for me) that needs "-m32"?
> > Would it need "-m64" if it was being cross-compiled on a 32-bit host
> > system for 64-bit client? Is
On Monday, May 04, 2015 3:41:54 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> Why is seamonkey the only program (so far for me) that needs "-m32"?
> Would it need "-m64" if it was being cross-compiled on a 32-bit host
> system for 64-bit client? Is there a wiki that we can contribute this
> info to?
It has to do wit
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:29:34AM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> All you need to do is create scripts on the host with the exact
> same names and have them execute the compiler that you want with
> the options you want (I just have it execute the 64bit compiler with
> -m32). Then make sure tha
Oh wow, I completely forgot about this open thread. In my defense, I had to
move out two (or was it three?) days after I started the thread, and didn't have
internet again until over a month later.
Am Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:30:01 +0530
schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan :
[...]
> Having tried this feature,
Greetings gents.
I may have missed it, but i haven't seen this suggested yet: RAID+LVM.
If you already have a 3TB drive, buy another (or two more) and build a
RAID1 or 5 array on them. Then build your LVM on top of /dev/md0 (or
whatever device your raid is).
Another approach is ZFS with RAID-Z or
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:29:34AM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> The error on the link that you posted looks like cause by pump mode,
> this one I'm not so sure.
>
> It looks like you're not using the cross compiler on the host as
> it would not generate 64 bit code. Did you add -m32 to your
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:57 AM, lee wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés writes:
>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:41 PM, lee wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't even read them on a working system.
>>
>> If that's true (which I highly doubt, more probably you don't know how to
>> read them), then it's a bug and should be
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2015 03:23:48 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> >> What
>> >> I wish, I had a second puter in a outbuilding that I could copy to
>> >> over ethernet or something. May help in the event of a house fire
>> >> etc.
>> >
>> > You have, it's
On Mon, 04 May 2015 05:40:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > You only need to upload it once, so it doesn't really matter how long
> > it takes. After that you do incremental backups. I use
> > app-backup/duplicity which not only takes care of incremental backups
> > and communicating with S3, but also enc
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:14 AM, lee wrote:
> Marc Joliet writes:
>
>> Personally, I'm probably going to uninstall syslog-ng, because journalctl is
>> *such* a nice way to read logs, so why run something whose output I'll never
>> read again?
>
> If you like it, nobody prevents you from using it.
Hello, Dale.
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:23:48AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> What I wish, I had a second puter in a outbuilding that I could copy
> >> to over ethernet or something. May help in the event of a house
> >> fire etc.
> > You have, it's called Amazon S3 :) It's a l
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2015 03:23:48 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
What
I wish, I had a second puter in a outbuilding that I could copy to
over ethernet or something. May help in the event of a house fire
etc.
>>> You have, it's called Amazon S3 :) It's a lot cheaper th
On Mon, 04 May 2015 03:23:48 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> What
> >> I wish, I had a second puter in a outbuilding that I could copy to
> >> over ethernet or something. May help in the event of a house fire
> >> etc.
> >
> > You have, it's called Amazon S3 :) It's a lot cheaper than a second
> > comp
On Monday, May 04, 2015 5:29:34 AM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sunday, May 03, 2015 11:59:08 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 02:57:46PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> >
> > > Some packages do custom preprocessing and other weird things during
> > > the build process that ca
On Sunday, May 03, 2015 11:59:08 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 02:57:46PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
>
> > Some packages do custom preprocessing and other weird things during
> > the build process that cause problems with pump mode since it caches
> > copies of the unmodifie
Mick wrote:
> On Monday 04 May 2015 08:46:26 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 May 2015 02:39:10 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> I really do need to set up RAID at least for some stuff that I may not
>>> be able to get back. Some videos I have are no longer available.
>>
>> RAID is not a backup solution
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2015 02:39:10 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> I wasn't suggesting symlinks, just LVs mounted at appropriate points.
>>> It rather depends on the spread of Dale's data. If he just needs
>>> extra space for his videos, he could get a new drive and mount it at
>>> ~/vide
On Monday 04 May 2015 08:46:26 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 May 2015 02:39:10 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I really do need to set up RAID at least for some stuff that I may not
> > be able to get back. Some videos I have are no longer available.
>
> RAID is not a backup solution.
Not only RAID
On Mon, 04 May 2015 02:39:10 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I wasn't suggesting symlinks, just LVs mounted at appropriate points.
> > It rather depends on the spread of Dale's data. If he just needs
> > extra space for his videos, he could get a new drive and mount it at
> > ~/videos.
>
> The bulk of the
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:13:41 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> An alternative is to create a new volume group on the new disk and
>>> mounts PVs at various points in your home directory. That way you get
>>> the extra space and much of the flexibility without the risk of a
>>
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> << SNIP >>
>
> Dale
>
>
>
> P. S.
>
>
> Filesystem Size Used AvailUse% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/Home2-Home2 2.7T 1.8T 945G 66% /home
>
>
>
Well, I read replies a few times and I think it is best to just add a
new drive. He
23 matches
Mail list logo
