Alan Grimes wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> If you kept your system updated all the time, you shouldnt have any
>> problems.
> Byte me.
>
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running. =( I'm the user here, I am not going to take any lip from you
> abo
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2015 10:22:09 Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
>> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
>> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Saturday, April 11, 2015 10:22:09 AM Alan Grimes wrote:
>> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
>> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
>> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who
On Saturday 11 April 2015 20:42:20 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running.
Just don't bother, and save the rest of us some earache.
[Apologies to those who recognised the troll.)
--
Rgds
Peter
On 04/11/2015 05:42 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Byte me.
>
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running.
I'll see your grumpy, and raise you two grumpies :p
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> > 1. My machine is not correctly configured to build 32 bit executables,
> > mainly because I cannot find a 32 bit version of ncurses that ld is
> > willing to acknowledge the existence of.
>
> This seems to be working for just about everyone else. So mayb
On Saturday 11 April 2015 10:22:09 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed out
> the changes to portage
On Saturday, April 11, 2015 10:22:09 AM Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed out
> the changes to por
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:41:28 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> >> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit
> >> enabled. ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one place:
> >> /etc/portage/make.conf and nowhere else. But, nevertheless, ABI_x86
> >> WAS set which broke the profile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Alan,
> 1. My machine is not correctly configured to build 32 bit executables,
> mainly because I cannot find a 32 bit version of ncurses that ld is
> willing to acknowledge the existence of.
This seems to be working for just about everyone els
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> And then portage did two things.
>>
>> 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
>> go.
>>
>> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled.
>> ALARM: ABI_x86 s
On Saturday 11 Apr 2015 15:34:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > And then portage did two things.
> >
> > 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
> > go.
> >
> > 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 w
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> And then portage did two things.
>
> 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
> go.
>
> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled.
> ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one p
My machine is so completely broken right now I can't open any new
terminal sessions.
This is because I stupidly tried to toggle tinfo useflag in a desperate
attempt to get everything in my portage tree working again.
Why now did nothing in my portage tree build?
It wasn't building for two reason
On Sunday 05 April 2015 10:50:53 I wrote:
> Today's routine update included dev-lang/perl-5.20.2 and two perl
> virtuals. Since emerging those portage has stopped working: perl-cleaner
> gives it a list of 71 packages to emerge but portage does nothing with
> them - it just exits silently. Then pe
On Saturday 11 Apr 2015 00:08:23 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Back to the original theme, I'd been experimenting with -j and -l make
> options, and I suspect that was my real problem. I finished up with "-j
> -l20" on this i5 box, with startling results - 56 emerges in parallel for
> instance. I suspec
16 matches
Mail list logo
