> On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:28, Mick wrote:
>
> I've looked at zugaina too and didn't find anything, hence I asked here.
> I'll
> file a bug at some point, unless anyone beats me to it.
Writing an ebuild to do the install is like 5 min job :) I'm now in a train
only with a phone, but when i get
On Monday 16 Mar 2015 01:48:31 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> > I understand the convenience of having an ebuild to distribute commonly
> > used software like flash, especially from a distribution POV, but the
> > question still goes unanswered: wh
On 16/03/15 03:58, Philip Webb wrote:
Yesterday, I updated to gtk+-3.14.9 ,
which required installation of x11-themes/adwaita-icon-theme .
This new unwanted pkg created a dir under /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11
& a symbolic link 'default->Adwaita', which changed my mouse cursor.
Not liking the ne
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:58:02 -0400 Philip Webb wrote:
> Yesterday, I updated to gtk+-3.14.9 ,
> which required installation of x11-themes/adwaita-icon-theme .
> This new unwanted pkg created a dir under /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11
> & a symbolic link 'default->Adwaita', which changed my mouse c
Hi,
I am a little confused
I had installed dev-lisp/clisp on my PC, then I tried that on my two
little ARM (armv5ejt) boards and I fails.
Then I installed dev-lisp/gcl there (which compiles fine).
But...
When I called clisp on my PC I get (beside some ascii art and others):
Welcome to
Yesterday, I updated to gtk+-3.14.9 ,
which required installation of x11-themes/adwaita-icon-theme .
This new unwanted pkg created a dir under /usr/share/cursors/xorg-x11
& a symbolic link 'default->Adwaita', which changed my mouse cursor.
Not liking the new cursor, I did some research, found the
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
>
> I understand the convenience of having an ebuild to distribute commonly
> used software like flash, especially from a distribution POV, but the
> question still goes unanswered: why does HE want an ebuild to install a
> .deb package?
>
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Dale [15-03-14 09:20]:
>> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> emerge hits me:
>>>
>>> Whiletrying to reolve a lot of blockers, emerge @preserved-rebuild
>>> gives me this:
>>>
>>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "kde-base/solid:4".
>>> (dependency requir
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Dale wrote:
>> I see lvm stuff with no errors. I'm pretty clueless on init thingys but
>> I think that is a good thing.
>>
>> Thoughts? Am I rebootable again?
>>
> Looks good to me.
>
>
Thanks much for the help. I hate, ummm, HATE, those
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Dale wrote:
> I see lvm stuff with no errors. I'm pretty clueless on init thingys but
> I think that is a good thing.
>
> Thoughts? Am I rebootable again?
>
Looks good to me.
Dale wrote:
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> In older versions of the dracut ebuild (> DRACUT_MODULES was used to select which modules to install.
>>
>> In newer versions, DRACUT_MODULES is no longer used; instead, all
>> modules are installed every time. That's why you see all the flags in
>> parentheses:
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> In older versions of the dracut ebuild ( DRACUT_MODULES was used to select which modules to install.
>
> In newer versions, DRACUT_MODULES is no longer used; instead, all
> modules are installed every time. That's why you see all the flags in
> parentheses: the flags have been
On 15 March 2015 at 23:15, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Emanuele Rusconi
> wrote:
> >
> > It's not open source, is it?
> > Why do you want an ebuild to install a binary .deb file?
>
> There aren't many of them, but there are ebuilds that install
> proprietary binary fil
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
>
> It's not open source, is it?
> Why do you want an ebuild to install a binary .deb file?
There aren't many of them, but there are ebuilds that install
proprietary binary files even in the main repository. One of the
advantages of Gentoo
On 15 March 2015 at 20:20, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Would anyone know which overlay has wickr[1], or if there is an ebuild for
> it?
> I can't find it in portage.
>
> Also, do you use it and what do you think of it? Is it as secure as
> claimed?
>
> [1] https://www.wickr.com/downloads/
>
> --
>
On 15/03/2015 16:45, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
>
>
>> On March 14, 2015 at 6:12 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>
>> It took 10 years but I've finally done something monumentally stupid in
>> Gentoo:
>>
>> I delete package.use and have no backup
>>
>> Is there any easy way to recover what was in it? I'
Hi All,
Would anyone know which overlay has wickr[1], or if there is an ebuild for it?
I can't find it in portage.
Also, do you use it and what do you think of it? Is it as secure as claimed?
[1] https://www.wickr.com/downloads/
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:45:32 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> You have lost nothing, thanks to gentoolkit. Please run "enalyze
> rebuild use" and you will get package.use.test which will be the
> difference between default USE flags and yours.
Nice one! Who needs backups?
--
Neil Bothwick
> On March 14, 2015 at 6:12 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
> It took 10 years but I've finally done something monumentally stupid in
> Gentoo:
>
> I delete package.use and have no backup
>
> Is there any easy way to recover what was in it? I'm busy doing it the
> long way round - repeatedly run
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Dale wrote:
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> I'm going to try to keep my cool but ya know. I built me a updated
>>> kernel, 3.18.9 to be more precise. A few weeks ago dracut was updated.
>>> It went to vers
On 15 March 2015 00:25:40 GMT+00:00, James wrote:
> Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
>
>
> > > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that
> > > it will updated but not depclean out those packages.
>
> > A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in
> /etc/portag
On 15 March 2015 10:25:40 AM AEST, James wrote:
>Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
>
>
>> > I'm not sure how to put everything dev-java into a set; so that
>> > it will updated but not depclean out those packages.
>
>> A set can be simply a list of packages in a file in
>/etc/portage/sets.
On Saturday 14 March 2015 20:53:44 Matti Nykyri wrote:
> Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login
> process reveals that login set things as you tell it to in
> /etc/login.defs
>
> In this file change the line:
> TTYPERM 0600
> To:
> TTYPERM 0620
>
> And your problem is f
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I'm going to try to keep my cool but ya know. I built me a updated
>> kernel, 3.18.9 to be more precise. A few weeks ago dracut was updated.
>> It went to version dracut-041. Well, it wouldn't build anything. It
On 03/14/2015 07:36:36 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a LISP version for my embedded system.
>
> I tried CLISP and the compilation of the ffcall-package fails do
> to some (embedded?) assembler codes...
>
> Does anyone know of a Lisp variant (near CLISP), which success
> On Mar 14, 2015, at 21:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> There is a use-case for doing it (but I highly doubt the OP is using it)
Yes. I was just thinking if the OP has a miss configuration in
/etc/security/access.conf and can't login as himself on a local console. And
that way is forced to use r
26 matches
Mail list logo
