On 20/01/15 05:10, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, James wrote:
>> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>>
>> I was wondering what my /etc/fstab should look like using uuids, raid 1 and
>> btrfs.
>
> From mine:
> /dev/disk/by-uuid/7d9f3772-a39c-408b-9be0-5fa26eec8342
On 20/01/15 00:50, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>
>>> Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>
Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1
>
> Interesting.
> I am about to test (reboot) a btrfs, raid one installation.
>
>> Brilliant, you
On 19/01/15 22:08, Marc Stuermer wrote:
> Am 19.01.2015 um 12:02 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>
>> Brilliant, you have hit on the answer! - The ancient 300GB system disk
>> was sda at one point and moved to sdb - possibly at the time I changed
>> to using UUID's. Ive just resized all the disks and its
On 01/19/2015 03:27 PM, Michael Cook wrote:
> On 01/19/2015 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
>> gcc-4.9.2 surprised me by landing on ~amd64 today, and I'm still
>> very vague about the status of stack protection on gentoo.
>>
>> I seem to recall reading (somewhere) that gcc-4.9.x is needed for
>> compiling t
On 01/19/2015 06:09 PM, walt wrote:
gcc-4.9.2 surprised me by landing on ~amd64 today, and I'm still very vague
about the status of stack protection on gentoo.
I seem to recall reading (somewhere) that gcc-4.9.x is needed for compiling
the kernel with CONFIG_CC_STACK_PROTECTOR_STRONG so I've nev
gcc-4.9.2 surprised me by landing on ~amd64 today, and I'm still very vague
about the status of stack protection on gentoo.
I seem to recall reading (somewhere) that gcc-4.9.x is needed for compiling
the kernel with CONFIG_CC_STACK_PROTECTOR_STRONG so I've never tried it until
today.
Is my recoll
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:32 PM, James wrote:
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>> Lots of folks everywhere are saying "no thanks anyway." I'd be
>> shocked if embedded was any different. Lots of distros want nothing
>> to do with it, and lots of distros are switching over wholeheartedly.
>> I
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> Lots of folks everywhere are saying "no thanks anyway." I'd be
> shocked if embedded was any different. Lots of distros want nothing
> to do with it, and lots of distros are switching over wholeheartedly.
> I'm not really sure what this has to do with Gentoo
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 07:00:52PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote
> 3) Individual interested in getting every bit of performance
> possible from own hardware. Frankly this was the reason why I
> switched to Gentoo from RH about 8 years ago. I just tired to
> rebuild each time a significant part of
Am 19.01.2015 um 19:03 schrieb James:
> I think you drasitcally over_estimate the number of those happy linux
> distro users. I think if there was an easy way to perform a few typical
> gentoo installs (workstation, mail-server, web server, dns server,
> hardended*) then folks would migrate heavil
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:50 AM, James wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
> I was wondering what my /etc/fstab should look like using uuids, raid 1 and
> btrfs.
>From mine:
/dev/disk/by-uuid/7d9f3772-a39c-408b-9be0-5fa26eec8342 /
btrfs noatime,ssd,compre
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:04:44 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Speak for yourself. :) I did comment on my thoughts in this area in
>> Donnie's thread. Gentoo (IMHO) tends not to be the best distro for
>> doing anything in particular. I find
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM, James wrote:
>
> I think the fundamental flaw with systemd is the fact that the duality
> of support for systemd and other init solutions is so quickly abondoned.
> If they were allowed (encouraged) to run side by side for a few years,
> let folks decide then; as i
Andrew Savchenko gentoo.org> writes:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:04:44 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Speak for yourself. :) I did comment on my thoughts in this area in
> > Donnie's thread. Gentoo (IMHO) tends not to be the best distro for
> > doing anything in particular. I find that its best f
On 2015-01-18, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Speak for yourself. :) I did comment on my thoughts in this area in
> Donnie's thread. Gentoo (IMHO) tends not to be the best distro for
> doing anything in particular. I find that its best feature is that it
> is reasonably good at doing just about anythin
Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> > Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> >> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1
Interesting.
I am about to test (reboot) a btrfs, raid one installation.
> Brilliant, you have hit on the answer! - The ancient 300GB syste
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:04:44 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
> Speak for yourself. :) I did comment on my thoughts in this area in
> Donnie's thread. Gentoo (IMHO) tends not to be the best distro for
> doing anything in particular. I find that its best feature is that it
> is reasonably good at doing
On 01/19/2015 08:33 AM, Thanasis wrote:
>
> Can you also try
>
>
>
> eix-remote update
>
>
>
> and let the command finish, and also note what file it downloads (at the
> beginning) and from where, please?
>
>
>
>
>
Just ran it; it downloads
http://gpo.zugaina.org/eix_cache/eix-cache.tbz2. It ter
On 19/01/15 05:11, Philip Webb wrote:
Typically, when I try to watch a short movie from a general news site,
it stops quickly with an error message : it seems not to download fast enough.
I assumed this was a problem with Adobe flash (all versions),
but on the Mageia system I also have installed
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Dale wrote:
Thanasis wrote:
On 01/19/2015 11:54 AM, Dale wrote:
I've ran it twice at least since this thread started. No problems so
far.
Dale
Was it the following command that you run?
eix-remote update
I run eix-sync which I'm pretty sure runs that too amo
Am 19.01.2015 um 12:02 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
> Brilliant, you have hit on the answer! - The ancient 300GB system disk
> was sda at one point and moved to sdb - possibly at the time I changed
> to using UUID's. Ive just resized all the disks and its now moved past
> 300G for the first time as we
On 19/01/15 18:45, Marc Stürmer wrote:
> Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
>
>> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
>> volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
>> Content is mostly VM images.
>>
>> sdc and sdd are 2TB
On 19/01/15 17:46, Marc Stürmer wrote:
>
> Zitat von Bill Kenworthy :
>
>> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
>> volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
>> Content is mostly VM images.
>
> On which kernel version are you?
>
3.
Am 17.01.2015 um 00:25 schrieb Paul B. Henson:
http://www.linuxvoice.com/interview-lennart-poettering/
So it seems the reason (in Lennart Poettering's imagination at least)
that Gentoo hasn't embraced systemd as our default init system is
because we're all old and conservative? Not like those y
Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy:
Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
Content is mostly VM images.
sdc and sdd are 2TB WD greens, and sda is a 2TB WD red.
Question: was /de
Thanasis wrote:
> On 01/19/2015 11:54 AM, Dale wrote:
>
>>
>> I've ran it twice at least since this thread started. No problems so
>> far.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>
> Was it the following command that you run?
>
> eix-remote update
>
>
>
I run eix-sync which I'm pretty sure runs that too among other parts
On 01/19/2015 11:54 AM, Dale wrote:
I've ran it twice at least since this thread started. No problems so far.
Dale
Was it the following command that you run?
eix-remote update
On 18.01.2015 09:25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> My advice:
>
> Start with groups. If you find you need to have lots of "when"
> clauses to make the plays work across more than one distro, and the
> whens follow the same format, then you might want to split them into
> groups. Make for example a "gent
On 01/19/2015 11:43 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I don't use eix-sync, but I tried it just now without arguments and it
seemed to work just fine.
What was the command you tried, and what was the remote file downloaded?
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 19 January 2015 10:56:18 Thanasis wrote:
>> On 01/17/2015 11:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2015 02:43 AM, walt wrote:
I've never used eix-remote and I'm not sure what it does. Is there a
reason you don't use eix-sync instead?
>>> The result of eix-
Zitat von Bill Kenworthy :
Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
Content is mostly VM images.
On which kernel version are you?
On Monday 19 January 2015 10:56:18 Thanasis wrote:
> On 01/17/2015 11:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
> > On 01/17/2015 02:43 AM, walt wrote:
> >> I've never used eix-remote and I'm not sure what it does. Is there a
> >> reason you don't use eix-sync instead?
> >
> > The result of eix-sync is the same, be
Am Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:32:53 +0800
schrieb Bill Kenworthy :
> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
> volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
> Content is mostly VM images.
>
> sdc and sdd are 2TB WD greens, and sda is a 2TB WD red.
On 01/17/2015 11:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
On 01/17/2015 02:43 AM, walt wrote:
I've never used eix-remote and I'm not sure what it does. Is there a
reason you don't use eix-sync instead?
The result of eix-sync is the same, because it calls eix-remote
Am I the only one seeing this?
Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk
volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed?
Content is mostly VM images.
sdc and sdd are 2TB WD greens, and sda is a 2TB WD red.
rattus backups # btrfs fi sh
Label: none uuid: 04d8ff4f-fe19-4530-a
35 matches
Mail list logo
