Am 25.11.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Gevisz:
It usually took me from 10 to 20 minutes to download my daily updates
in Ubuntu. For big packages - about 40 minutes or even more.
That's the time saving aspect
lol :)
Not "lol", it is like I told you. Binary distributions are a big, big
time saver c
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> >>
> >> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> >> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
> >> *forced* their users to accept the new place
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:56:58 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
>
> > > The point was that it could be changed. […]
> > >
> > > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
> >
> > No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyan
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100 Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> > The point was that it could be changed. […]
> >
> > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
>
> No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
> e
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:35:18 +0100, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> > The point was that it could be changed. […]
> >
> > […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
>
> No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
> enough to drive people away.
Well, if you put it like th
On 25 November 2014 at 23:42, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> The point was that it could be changed. […]
>
> […] It's about as on-topic and relevant as WinXP.
No, the point was that sometimes even a small annoyance is plenty
enough to drive people away.
The point was that when you feel that the distro
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:24:34 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > > Can you, please, help me? :)
> >
> > I did, I told you about UbuntuTweak, but here's a link
> > http://bit.ly/1rpmTbK
>
> Yes, but this simply does not work.
OK, so it doesn't work.
The point was that it could be changed. I neither re
On 2014-11-25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
>>> specify a preference.
>>
>> If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not speci
On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>>
>> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
>> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
>> *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
>> frame button and have argued that it is more ergon
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:49:53 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:55:07 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > > > Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
> > > > Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
> > > > here.
> > >
> > > Why not G
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:56:05 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 19:03, Gevisz wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
> I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
> > logical, ergon
On 25/11/2014 19:03, Gevisz wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
> logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
>>> Only now, I have realized that, logicall
On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
>> specify a preference.
>
> If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not specify a
> preference", then what _does_ "default
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:55:07 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > > Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
> > > Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
> > > here.
> >
> > Why not Google it yourself?
>
> Because it is very hard to google a link if it d
Am Dienstag 25 November 2014, 12:56:00 schrieb Alec Ten Harmsel:
> I am just wondering, though,
> why aren't all internal variables prefixed with PORTAGE_ or the like to
> prevent this sort of thing?
>
it's not really internal, just defined in an eclass... and these are regular
environment vari
On 11/25/14 14:04, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
On 11/25/2014 01:13 PM, Joseph wrote:
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "media-libs/phonon-vlc" has u
Am Montag 24 November 2014, 18:13:56 schrieb James:
>
> If you want java to prosper at Gentoo, it's gonna take an "inner-circle"
> gentoo-dev to at least cheerlead for java within gentoo, imho.
>
I'm not really sure what this "inner-circle" stuff is supposed to mean.
You need a gentoo-dev who
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:13:25AM -0700, Joseph wrote
> I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
>
> Calculating dependencies /
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
> ... done!
>
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "media-libs/phonon-vlc" has unmet
> requir
On 11/25/2014 01:13 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
>
> Calculating dependencies /
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
> ... done!
>
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "media-libs/phonon-vlc" has unmet
> requirements.
> - media-li
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:21:06 -0700 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> >
> > No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> > in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
> > *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
> > frame button and have ar
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> I do recall that one way of doing it is with UbuntuTweak.
Unity-tweak-tool cant move window buttons to the right in 14.04
as of September 3, 2014:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
>
> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
> *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
> frame button and have argued that it is more ergonomic.
>
> There was not any possibility t
I'm getting a message for: media-libs/phonon-vlc
Calculating dependencies /
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for media-libs/phonon-vlc
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "media-libs/phonon-vlc" has unmet
requirements.
- media-libs/phonon-vlc-0.7.2::gentoo USE="-debug -qt4 (-qt5)" A
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:48 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > > It was possible, Google has hits on this dated from shortly after the
> > > time Unity was released.
> >
> > Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
>
On 11/25/2014 10:41 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>> You could check (before running emerge) if you see the "3.2.10" anywhere
>>> in
>>> your environment ("set|less")... or if maybe $PV or $S is set outside
>>> emerge somewhere.
>> Wow, incredible. I never thought to check my environment, but the
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:13:53 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote:
> Am 24.11.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Gevisz:
>
> > I switched from Ubuntu 10.04 to Gentoo just because it forced closing
> > window button "x" to the upper-left corner of the window in Unity of
> > Ubuntu 12.04 while I used to look for it in the
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:09:08 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > It was possible, Google has hits on this dated from shortly after the
> > time Unity was released.
>
> Please, give me the link. I will check if it is correct on my old
> Ubuntu 12.04 partition (yes, I still have it) and report the result
>
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:41:10 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > > Wouldn't it have been easier to use the simple configuration option to
> > > move the button back to where you expected it? Far less effort than
> > > switching distros.
> >
> >
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:45:50 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
> >> I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
> >> > logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
> > Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
> > to rearrange all t
On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
> specify a preference.
If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not specify a
preference", then what _does_ "default" mean?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwar
> > You could check (before running emerge) if you see the "3.2.10" anywhere
> > in
> > your environment ("set|less")... or if maybe $PV or $S is set outside
> > emerge somewhere.
>
> Wow, incredible. I never thought to check my environment, but these:
>
> MODULE_VERSION=3.2.10
> MODULE_V
On 11/25/2014 04:49 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>
>> I've been having a really strange issue with net-print/cups-filters for
>> the last few weeks, wondering whether or not it's a bug or I just have
>> something configured wrong. Somehow ${S} is defined as:
>>
>> /var/tmp/portage/
On Friday, November 21, 2014 08:06:25 PM Peter Weilbacher wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, thegeezer wrote:
> > On 20/11/14 18:19, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > > But I like that trackpoint
> >
> > yeah at first it's odd, but then when you start getting used to
> > navigating without removing
On Tuesday 25 November 2014 11:45:50 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
> >> I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
> >>
> >> > logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
> >
> > Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
> > to rearr
Hi Alec,
> I've been having a really strange issue with net-print/cups-filters for
> the last few weeks, wondering whether or not it's a bug or I just have
> something configured wrong. Somehow ${S} is defined as:
>
> /var/tmp/portage/net-print/cups-filters-1.0.53/work/cups-filters-3.2.10
>
On 25/11/2014 09:15, Gevisz wrote:
>> I even can agree with them that a new place of that button was
>> > logical, ergonomic and saved screen space.
> Only now, I have realized that, logically, it was possible
> to rearrange all the elements of Unity in such a way that
> it was logical, ergonomic,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:17:07 -0500, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> You can also make a multiboot USB (for most live CDs) like that, Just
> use syslinux as your bootloader, to install a new live CD (in a
> nutshell):
>
> 1. Create a FAT partition big enough to store the Live CD. If the CD
> has a vol
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:53:14 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > Wouldn't it have been easier to use the simple configuration option to
> > move the button back to where you expected it? Far less effort than
> > switching distros.
>
> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> in
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:35:26 +1100, wraeth wrote:
> I just had a look through the man pages of emerge, portage and ebuild,
> plus at the Gentoo Devmanual and couldn't find anything; however I'm
> reasonably certain that in the context of an ebuild, a use flag
> defined as "+flag" means that it is
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 10:15:38 PM James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok the latest release of livedvd is here:
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/news/20140826-livedvd.xml
>
> So my understanding is you can put this on a usb stick. Run
> gentoo live, download packages, set flags, install packages
> and
40 matches
Mail list logo
