On 25/09/14 22:03, James wrote:
> Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
>>> Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
>> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
>> with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all
> ah, back when ethernet d
On 26/09/2014 02:23, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:03:02PM +, James wrote
>> Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes:
>>
>>
Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
>>
>>> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
>>> with udev-2
Hello,
Here an short article talks about mesos and openstack.
http://openstacksv.com/2014/09/02/make-no-small-plans/
enjoy,
James
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:03:02PM +, James wrote
> Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
> > > Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
>
> > in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
> > with udev-208, from time before the .link support at
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote
> On 25/09/2014 02:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > ...with malicious stuff, and it could get ugly. app-shells/bash-4.2_p48
> > has been pushed to Gentoo stable. The same "env" command results in...
>
> Unfortunately, that ver
On 17/09/14 10:24, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do I need to configure my Gentoo box to allow for reverse
> tethering from my (rooted) Android phone?
>
> Many thanks for a hint,
> Helmut
>
not sure if you can do this even on a rooted phone.
the trouble is that usb tethering starts a dhcp se
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-09-25, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
>>> On 2014-09-24, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:42:56 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> After an update yesterday
On 17/09/14 19:21, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> AFS has caching and can survive temporary disappearance of the server.
> For me, I need to be able to provide Samba filesharing on top of that
> layer on 2 different locations as I don't see the network bandwidth to
> be sufficient for normal operations. (AD
On 16/09/14 20:07, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> By now many are familiar with my keen interest in clustering gentoo
> systems. So, what most cluster technologies use is a distributed file
> system on top of the local (HD/SDD) file system. Naturally not
> all file systems, particularly the distributed
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:22:15 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> > I use a home-brewed script to make time based snapshots, called from
> > cron - a little like zfs-auto-snapshot. I set a limit on the number of
> > each type of snapshot so the script generally creates one snapshot and
> > deletes one snapsho
James wrote:
> Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
>>> Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
>> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
>> with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all
> ah, back when ethernet defaulted to eth0 not
Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes:
> > Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
> with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all
ah, back when ethernet defaulted to eth0 not "enp5s0" ?
> eud
On 25/09/14 18:25, James wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
> so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
> I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
> I build up a new workstation.
>
> S
James wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
> so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
> I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
> I build up a new workstation.
>
> So changing from udev
On 2014-09-25, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2014-09-24, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:42:56 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
After an update yesterday, I've noticed that the group assigned to
ttyUSB devices ha
Ok,
So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
I build up a new workstation.
So changing from udev-215 to eudev-1.10-r2 is as
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-09-24, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:42:56 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>>> After an update yesterday, I've noticed that the group assigned to
>>> ttyUSB devices has changed from uucp to root. Non-USB serial
On 2014-09-25 16:02, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/09/2014 02:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
[snip]
> ...with malicious stuff, and it could get ugly. app-shells/bash-4.2_p48
> has been pushed to Gentoo stable. The same "env" command results in...
Unfortunately, that versi
Kerin Millar wrote:
> On 25/09/2014 02:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > ...with malicious stuff, and it could get ugly. app-shells/bash-4.2_p48
> > has been pushed to Gentoo stable. The same "env" command results in...
>
> Unfortunately, that version did fully address the problem. Ins
On 25/09/2014 13:54, Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/09/2014 02:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
[snip]
...with malicious stuff, and it could get ugly. app-shells/bash-4.2_p48
has been pushed to Gentoo stable. The same "env" command results in...
Unfortunately, that version did fully address the problem.
On 25/09/2014 02:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
[snip]
...with malicious stuff, and it could get ugly. app-shells/bash-4.2_p48
has been pushed to Gentoo stable. The same "env" command results in...
Unfortunately, that version did fully address the problem. Instead,
upgrade to 4.2_p48-r1 or any of
On 25/09/2014 13:09, Gevisz wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:10:00 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On 25/09/2014 11:02, Gevisz wrote:
>>> Running
>>> #emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask
>>> after updating my system today, I have got the following:
>> These are the packages that would be
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:10:00 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/09/2014 11:02, Gevisz wrote:
> > Running
> > #emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask
> > after updating my system today, I have got the following:
> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
> >
> > dev-lang/tk
> > s
On 25/09/2014 11:02, Gevisz wrote:
> Running
> #emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask
> after updating my system today, I have got the following:
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> dev-lang/tk
> selected: 8.5.15
>protected: none
> omitted: none
>
> dev-lan
Running
#emerge --depclean --backtrack=60 --ask
after updating my system today, I have got the following:
>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
dev-lang/tk
selected: 8.5.15
protected: none
omitted: none
dev-lang/tcl
selected: 8.5.15-r1
protected: none
on 09/25/2014 12:11 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
I use a home-brewed script to make time based snapshots, called from
cron - a little like zfs-auto-snapshot. I set a limit on the number of
each type of snapshot so the script generally creates one snapshot and
deletes one snapshot for ea
26 matches
Mail list logo
