On Wednesday 30 Apr 2014 03:50:12 Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 03:58 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
> >
> >> On 04/29/2014 12:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >>> Another couple of things I didn't realize. Accord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2014 03:58 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
>
>> On 04/29/2014 12:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>>
>>> Another couple of things I didn't realize. According to
>>> https://wiki.g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
Hi,
the recent upgrade to Gnome 3.12.1 includes
app-misc/tracker-1.0 which forces me to decide between gstreamer and
ffmpeg.
It says
The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
at-most-one-of ( gstreamer ffmpeg )
On 04/29/2014 05:49 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Regular readers* will know...
> * Off-topic note for American readers: as far as I'm concerned, "regular"
> does not mean "ordinary". That neologism is even polluting our high streets
> over here.
I've used both of those words all my life bu
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
> On 04/29/2014 12:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >
> > Another couple of things I didn't realize. According to
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Dm-crypt I have to build in support for the
> > crypt target in the kernel. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2014 12:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:51:18PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
>
>> I suggest with LUKS. Also I suggest using ext4 and disabling the
>> journal (mkfs.ext4 -O ^has_journal).
>
> I didn't know y
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:51:18PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote
> I suggest with LUKS. Also I suggest using ext4 and disabling the
> journal (mkfs.ext4 -O ^has_journal).
I didn't know you could do that, but what's the point? I'm not trying
to be argumentative, but isn't ext4 without
On Tuesday 29 Apr 2014 15:11:41 Joseph wrote:
> On 04/29/14 08:20, Mick wrote:
> >On Monday 28 Apr 2014 23:03:44 Joseph wrote:
> >> On 04/28/14 21:38, Mick wrote:
> >> >On Monday 28 Apr 2014 19:56:24 Joseph wrote:
> >> >> How do I disable apache 40bit encryption connection to my server?
> >> >> Is
On 04/29/14 08:20, Mick wrote:
On Monday 28 Apr 2014 23:03:44 Joseph wrote:
On 04/28/14 21:38, Mick wrote:
>On Monday 28 Apr 2014 19:56:24 Joseph wrote:
>> How do I disable apache 40bit encryption connection to my server?
>> Is there a way to limit the connection to min 128-bit?
>>
> http://htt
On Tuesday 29 Apr 2014 08:19:15 Philip Webb wrote:
> I sometimes have the feeling Portage's behaviour is not fully thought out
> & often that Portage advisory messages are written by Martians (grin).
Regular readers* will know that I have my problems with portage from time to
time, but accusing
140429 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:16:03 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
PW> Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force & deprecated.
NB> Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
PW> * This action can remove important packages!
> * In order to be safer, use `emerg
On Monday 28 Apr 2014 23:03:44 Joseph wrote:
> On 04/28/14 21:38, Mick wrote:
> >On Monday 28 Apr 2014 19:56:24 Joseph wrote:
> >> How do I disable apache 40bit encryption connection to my server?
> >> Is there a way to limit the connection to min 128-bit?
> >>
> > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:16:03 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force & deprecated.
> > Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
>
> root:565 ~> emerge -C nano
>* This action can re
140429 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force & deprecated.
> Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
root:565 ~> emerge -C nano
* This action can remove important packages! In order to be
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > Usually nano can be removed with emerge --depclean
>
> Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force & deprecated.
Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that. Brute force, maybe, but it
is the answer.
> I've checked 'man p
15 matches
Mail list logo
