On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:30:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy
> ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before
> updating...
Isn't that what the stable tree is for?
> This works well, and has saved me some s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/11/14 17:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
> What would be really helpful would be if the emerge --pretend
> output could show the date (and time?) that the new ebuild was made
> available...
I thought of something like this, but in emerge --search summary
Hi all,
I'm wondering if this is even feasible before I go open a
bug/enhancement request for portage for this...
One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy
ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before
updating...
This works well, and has
140410 walt wrote:
> Anyone here really understand the underlying principles?
There's an excellent description of the bug + the fix here :
http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/04/attack-of-week-openssl-heartbleed.html
--
,,
4 matches
Mail list logo