On 23/07/13 08:43, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally
intended.
not possible, logind since systemd >= 205 requires systemd and
On 23/07/13 09:11, András Csányi wrote:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
>> packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
>> and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
not possible, logind since systemd >= 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart, and such
a
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:14 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
> Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
> wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
>
>
> So when do I
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Alexander Puchmayr
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm thinking of bying a quad-core cpu, preferably an amd cpu because they are
> significantly cheaper than intel ones.
>
> The actual models are A8 (trinity, RD 7560D GPU) and A10 (richland RD 8570D
> GPU), or a plain Athlo
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:58 PM, wrote:
[ snip ]
> I have several things depending on consolekit:
>
> sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
> gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.8.3 requires sys-auth/consolekit
Dependency of gnome-control-center:
|| ( ( app-admin/openrc-se
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> Thank you for the FUD. I was beginning to miss M$.
>
> Heres the freedesktop entry for a more authoritative statement.
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
>
> On Jul 23, 2013 4:57 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
> wrote:
> >
> > maybe you should not
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:45:04 +0100, FredL wrote:
> I just use my current gentoo system for building a new one from
> scratch, so I only use my current system as it was only a livecd. I
> won't use my current world file or anything else coming from my current
> system (except things like hostname,
Le 2013/07/22 23:08, Alan McKinnon a écrit :
On 23/07/2013 00:02, FredL wrote:
Le 2013/07/22 22:44, Alan McKinnon a écrit :
On 22/07/2013 23:35, FredL wrote:
Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
packages insta
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 23.07.2013 00:22, schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
>> I personally use "discard" with ext4 and btrfs, but I have not done
>> tests or have evidence that it is the best choice for me. It's simply
>> what I chose and never changed it. :)
>
> T
Am 23.07.2013 00:22, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> I personally use "discard" with ext4 and btrfs, but I have not done
> tests or have evidence that it is the best choice for me. It's simply
> what I chose and never changed it. :)
Thanks, Paul!
More of a "I do it MY way" than a generic "best practice
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 19.07.2013 21:02, schrieb Paul Hartman:
>
>> Old SSDs that did not support TRIM would suffer write amplification
>> after a certain amount of data had been written to them, but any
>> modern SSD and modern OS will keep it nice and t
On 23/07/2013 00:02, FredL wrote:
> Le 2013/07/22 22:44, Alan McKinnon a écrit :
>> On 22/07/2013 23:35, FredL wrote:
>>
>> Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
>>
>>
>> no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
>> packages installed . I have checked at th
Thanks for the FUD.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:15 PM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
Funny.
Le 2013/07/22 22:44, Alan McKinnon a écrit :
On 22/07/2013 23:35, FredL wrote:
Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
packages installed . I have checked at the init script and find a line
in the depend section
Thank you for the FUD. I was beginning to miss M$.
Heres the freedesktop entry for a more authoritative statement.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
On Jul 23, 2013 4:57 AM, "Volker Armin Hemmann"
wrote:
>
> maybe you should not just believe everything posted. Especially from
Stroller wrote:
I wouldn't have bothered making this distinction, but I think:
1TB = 1000GB
1Tb = 125GB
There are also TiBs[0]:
1 TiB = 1024 GiB
Similarly, there are MiB, etc.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte
--
R
On 22/07/2013 23:35, FredL wrote:
>>
>> Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
>>
>>
>> no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
>> packages installed . I have checked at the init script and find a line
>> in the depend section saying :
>>
>> after lo lo0 d
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind ebuild
(wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
But yeah you usually stay away from unmaintained upstreams.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:03 PM, "Canek Peláez Valdés" wrote:
>
> ConsoleKit is for all practical
Am 19.07.2013 21:02, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> Old SSDs that did not support TRIM would suffer write amplification
> after a certain amount of data had been written to them, but any
> modern SSD and modern OS will keep it nice and tidy.
What's the "best practice" now for TRIM?
I changed to manual
Do you perhaps have NetworkManager or wicd installed?
no, none of them, it is a very basic install, with only the minimum
packages installed . I have checked at the init script and find a line
in the depend section saying :
after lo lo0 dbus
but dbus is not yet installed, can this be the caus
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Try app-admin/checkrestart, I generally run this after updating any
daemons or libraries.
This sounds very helpful, thanks for the suggestion Neil!
--
R
Le 2013/07/22 21:54, Paul Hartman a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:42 PM, FredL wrote:
when I boot the system, none of my two interface are started, instead
dhcpcd
start and assign ip from dhcp server
After booting if I manually start the scripts it assign my static
config to
an alias of
maybe you should not just believe everything posted. Especially from a
systemd fanboi.
2013/7/22 Michael Hampicke
> Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> > ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
> > packages you mentioned it support systemd just fin
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:42 PM, FredL wrote:
> when I boot the system, none of my two interface are started, instead dhcpcd
> start and assign ip from dhcp server
>
> After booting if I manually start the scripts it assign my static config to
> an alias of my interfaces...
>
> I really can't figu
Hello,
I've just build a new gentoo system from my running one (no cd install
at all) and everything seems to be fine except that I can't start any
net.* script from default runlevel.
I use the new udev naming scheme, it detect my 2 interface as enp2s0 and
enp5s1 so I have created the symlin
Am 21.07.2013 01:45, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> This sin't a rescue partition, it's just a GRUB menu entry and a
> copy f the ISO in /boot, so far less maintenance even than making
> sure a USB stick stays put. Plus it is much faster to boot.
Yep, I got that set up as well when I did my GRUB2-learn
Am 20.07.2013 05:32, schrieb luis jure:
> on 2013-07-20 at 09:51 William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> You have to map the drive so grub can find it:
>
> no, i don't think that's the problem.
>
> the problem is that with GPT disks you need a BIOS Boot Partition since
> they don't have a MBR. is that cor
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
> packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
> and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
>
Thanks, just purged consolekit from my
Hi there,
I'm thinking of bying a quad-core cpu, preferably an amd cpu because they are
significantly cheaper than intel ones.
The actual models are A8 (trinity, RD 7560D GPU) and A10 (richland RD 8570D
GPU), or a plain AthlonIIx4 (no GPU).
My question is: Are these GPUs supported properly unde
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:35:22AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> 130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
> > sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
> > but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
> > How did you r
On 22/07/13 18:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
It's how you look at it. I call it "mature" but
yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
So when do I have to install mysql to use it? How long until some crap ala
windows-regist
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
Regards.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gnome-base/gnome-set
On 22/07/2013 15:39, András Csányi wrote:
> On 22 July 2013 15:35, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>> gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
>>> sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
>>> but many packages depend on sys-auth/con
On 22 July 2013 15:35, Philip Webb wrote:
> 130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
>> sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
>> but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
>> How did you resolve this conflict?
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
> sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
> but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
> How did you resolve this conflict?
Don't use Gnome. I've been using Fluxbox for ye
On Jul 22, 2013 6:34 PM, "Samuli Suominen" wrote:
>
> On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How did you resolve this conflict?
>>
>> Many thanks for a hint,
>> Helmut
>
>
> As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is
On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
How did you resolve this conflict?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is not about to be removed and the
support for systemd-logind will be appended
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:49:48 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > experience with compiling in tempfs is that it works, but has a much
> > higher failure rate than on disk - i.e., things like OO/Lo, KDE, gcc
> > and glibc have large space requirements that you must make sure tmpfs
> > can satisf
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 09:03:46 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> Hi,
>
> gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
>
> sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
>
> but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
>
> emerge -vpc sys-auth/consolekit giv
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 06:19:09 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> experience with compiling in tempfs is that it works, but has a much
> higher failure rate than on disk - i.e., things like OO/Lo, KDE, gcc and
> glibc have large space requirements that you must make sure tmpfs can
> satisfy before yo
On 22/07/2013 10:46, William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 22/07/13 14:24, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 22/07/2013 00:19, William Kenworthy wrote:
>>> swap: this will make one of the bigger speedups to the system when you
>>> need swap. swap is good - yes you can do without it, but the day comes
>>> when yo
On 22/07/13 14:24, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/07/2013 00:19, William Kenworthy wrote:
>> swap: this will make one of the bigger speedups to the system when you
>> need swap. swap is good - yes you can do without it, but the day comes
>> when you REALLY do want it, and ... [crash!] ... otherwise
William Kenworthy wrote:
On 21/07/13 22:31, luis jure wrote:
OK, now i have my system successfully installed and running on my new SSD.
now i have to decide what to do with the rest of the disk (it's a 256MB
samsung).
the first big question is: what about swap? i found some web pages
(perhaps o
Hi,
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
emerge -vpc sys-auth/consolekit gives
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
gnome-base/gno
47 matches
Mail list logo
