In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> 2013/6/29 Zind
>>
>>> Can you search with dmesg and find if it's nead a firmware.
>>
>> Yes.
>> At the bottom of the dmesg message, I can see these lines:
>> request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-2030-6.ucode' failed.
>> request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-2030-5.uco
On 06/29/13 16:42, Grant wrote:
Remote, automated, secure backups is the most difficult and
time-consuming Gentoo project I've undertaken.
Right now I'm pushing data from each of my systems to a backup server
via rdiff-backup. The main problem with this is if a system is
compromised its backup
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 08:10:53PM +0300, Timur Aydin wrote
> I know that a sm-notify program is used on both NFS clients/servers to
> notify reboots, but this embedded system does not have the sm-notify
> capability. And I would rather not try to port it to uClinux.
>
> So, my question is, can I
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:36:14 -0700, Grant wrote:
> >> Isn't that a gaping security hole? I think this amounts to granting
> >> the backup server root read access (and write access if you want to
> >> restore) on each client?
> >
> > How can you backup system files without root read access? You
I used reiserfs3 (very good) and now btrfs (so-so, but getting better) -
stay away from anything ext* - they fall apart under the load eventually
losing the lot ... the filesystem gets hammered when its creating tons
of hardlinks. From personal experiance I have a very poor view on ext2
and ext3 .
>> > You have to grant root rsync access to the backuppc user on the
>> > server.
>>
>> Isn't that a gaping security hole? I think this amounts to granting
>> the backup server root read access (and write access if you want to
>> restore) on each client?
>
> How can you backup system files without
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:12:29 -0700, Grant wrote:
> > You have to grant root rsync access to the backuppc user on the
> > server.
>
> Isn't that a gaping security hole? I think this amounts to granting
> the backup server root read access (and write access if you want to
> restore) on each clie
>> How far would I have to open my systems in order for backuppc to
>> function?
>
> You have to grant root rsync access to the backuppc user on the server.
Isn't that a gaping security hole? I think this amounts to granting
the backup server root read access (and write access if you want to
rest
On 30/06/2013 09:19, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 29 Jun 2013 17:45:31 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I am using smplayer to play DVB-T, since Kaffeine stucks with some
channels.
This evening, smplayer notifies me, that a new version will be
available.
SMplayer is only able to know this by automon
On Sunday 30 Jun 2013 12:05:05 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 30/06/13 17:58, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Am 30.06.2013 01:42, schrieb Grant:
> >> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
> >> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
> >> owne
The server configuration is as follows:
===
bonsai ~ # cat /etc/conf.d/nfs
# /etc/conf.d/nfs
# If you wish to set the port numbers for lockd,
# please see /etc/sysctl.conf
# Optional services to include in default `
On 06/30/13 20:10, Timur Aydin wrote:
> Here is the mount command:
>
> mount -o nolock,tcp 10.2.2.254:/romfs_2011R1 /mnt
>
BTW, when I use UDP instead of TCP, then the mount works after repeated
reboots. But I would rather use TCP, because based on past experiments I
did, TCP mounted NFS shares
Hi,
I am using Gentoo Linux as an NFS server while doing development on an
Blackfin embedded system. The Blackfin is running uClinux and the
development host is Gentoo testing version (~amd64). The NFS server
version is 1.2.7.
Here is the problem that I am observing: I start from a known state,
r
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:11:35 -0700
Grant wrote:
> >> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
> >> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
> >> ownership, and keeps the backups safe even if the backed-up system
> >> is compromised?
> >
> > app-
On 30/06/13 17:58, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.06.2013 01:42, schrieb Grant:
>
>> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
>> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
>> ownership, and keeps the backups safe even if the backed-up system
Am 30.06.2013 01:42, schrieb Grant:
> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
> ownership, and keeps the backups safe even if the backed-up system is
> compromised?
>
> I did delve into bacula but dec
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:11:35 -0700, Grant wrote:
> > app-backup/backuppc
> >
> > It uses hard links, but to save space, so all versions of all files
> > are kept for your entire history, but unchanged files are kept only
> > once, even if present on multiple targets.
>
> Thank you for the recom
>> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
>> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
>> ownership, and keeps the backups safe even if the backed-up system is
>> compromised?
>
> app-backup/backuppc
>
> It uses hard links, but to save space, so
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:42:33 -0700, Grant wrote:
> Can anyone think of an automated method that remotely and securely
> backs up data from one system to another, preserves permissions and
> ownership, and keeps the backups safe even if the backed-up system is
> compromised?
app-backup/backuppc
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
