On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Yohan Pereira
> wrote:
>> On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>>> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
>>> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Am 30.01.2013 20:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>>
Put up the failed session of gdm here to keep the li
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 30.01.2013 20:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>>> Put up the failed session of gdm here to keep the list uncluttered:
>>>
>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24516209/gdm_proble
On 30/01/13 at 11:05pm, Teodor Spæren wrote:
> Totaly agree with you! Now if I could only get TF2 to work
TF2 works perfectly fine here. The only problem I'm facing (apart from
drop in productivity) is the cursor flip issue that Alexandre mentioned.
--
- Yohan Pereira
The difference betwee
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
>> steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
>>
>> The news item instructions specifie
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
> steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
>
> The news item instructions specified that I had to remove
> udev-postmount from my runlevels. I didn't
So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
The news item instructions specified that I had to remove
udev-postmount from my runlevels. I didn't have udev-postmount in my
runlevels, so I didn't remove it. Tu
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
>> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on
>> this?
>>
>> Chromium is easily recompiled wit
Am Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:35:40 -0600
schrieb »Q« :
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:07:44 +0100
> jens wefer wrote:
>
> > I wonder about the last update of fcron.It is an update to 3.1.1,
> > there is a new /etc/crontab file, which is mixed
> > with /etc/fcronfcrontab, without update notice.
>
> Read ab
Den 30.01.2013 22:28, skrev jdm:
Big thanks to the guys and girls who got the STEAM overlay up and
running.
Its awesome.
PS Along with Gentoo of course.
Getting darn all done in the way of work though!
Steam on Linux. Alas I can see the end of my dual booting days.
Regards
John
Totaly agree
Speaking about that, does anyone else here have the cursor flip problem?
I've seen some topics on several forums, but it seems that nobody figured
out a way to fix it...
Le 30 janv. 2013 22:29, "jdm" a écrit :
> Big thanks to the guys and girls who got the STEAM overlay up and
> running.
>
> Its
Big thanks to the guys and girls who got the STEAM overlay up and
running.
Its awesome.
PS Along with Gentoo of course.
Getting darn all done in the way of work though!
Steam on Linux. Alas I can see the end of my dual booting days.
Regards
John
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 20:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Put up the failed session of gdm here to keep the list uncluttered:
>>
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24516209/gdm_problems.txt
>
> I am away from this system for now ... more tomorr
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:07:44 +0100
jens wefer wrote:
> I wonder about the last update of fcron.It is an update to 3.1.1,
> there is a new /etc/crontab file, which is mixed
> with /etc/fcronfcrontab, without update notice.
Read about the new use flag "system-crontab", which is used by default.
Am 30.01.2013 20:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Put up the failed session of gdm here to keep the list uncluttered:
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24516209/gdm_problems.txt
I am away from this system for now ... more tomorrow, thanks so far.
Stefan
Am 30.01.2013 19:58, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Let's see what the logs have to say.
Failed again.
Put up the failed session of gdm here to keep the list uncluttered:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24516209/gdm_problems.txt
I added the line "sgw FAILED ..." in there to mark the failed effort to
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 19:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>
>> Everything looks fine. However, you did rebuild pambase, did you
>> rebooted your computer?
>
> Yes, I think so, but I am not sure right now.
> Will do now.
>
> Also, do you have
Am 30.01.2013 19:47, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Everything looks fine. However, you did rebuild pambase, did you
> rebooted your computer?
Yes, I think so, but I am not sure right now.
Will do now.
Also, do you have the following line in
> /etc/pam.d/system-login?
>
> -session optiona
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 19:13, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> --depclean done now, I revdep-rebuild now and will then check back with
>> gdm.service.
>>
>> just a minute ...
>
> Still no luck.
>
> consolekit is gone now
>
> # equery d
Am 30.01.2013 19:13, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> --depclean done now, I revdep-rebuild now and will then check back with
> gdm.service.
>
> just a minute ...
Still no luck.
consolekit is gone now
# equery d consolekit
* These packages depend on consolekit:
gnome-base/gdm-3.6.2 (cons
Am 30.01.2013 19:04, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> OK, did you run "emerge --depclean"? All of those packages use
> consolekit or systemd, but not both; if after --depclean'ing
> consolekit keeps lurking, could you uninstall it and mask it, followed
> by a "emerge -uDNvp world"? That would tell u
On 30/01/13 at 11:09pm, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
> safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on
> this?
>
> Chromium is easily recompiled with new libraries and you don't have a
> broken browser, which
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 18:52, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>> wrote:
>>> Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
>>>
I've just installed systemd on one of my systems
Am 30.01.2013 18:52, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
>>
>>> I've just installed systemd on one of my systems to give it a test and I
>>> had similar problems due to the systemd usef
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
>
>> I've just installed systemd on one of my systems to give it a test and I
>> had similar problems due to the systemd useflag on policykit being
>> hardmasked (it also pulled in
Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
> I've just installed systemd on one of my systems to give it a test and I
> had similar problems due to the systemd useflag on policykit being
> hardmasked (it also pulled in consolekit because of that).
> Since the errors are very similar you
There are two packages of chrome on repository, one is the binary
version officially made available by Google and another is the open
source version chromium.
Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on
t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:02:20PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> Would someone mind and take a look?
> Fatal IO error 11 (Die Ressource ist zur Zeit nicht verfügbar) on X
> server :0.
> Jan 30 17:47:09 hiro gdm-simple-slave[5097]: GLib-GObject-CRITICAL:
> g_object_unref: assertion `object
Would someone mind and take a look?
As mentioned in the former thread (I decided to start a new one) I can't
login to Gnome via gdm right now ... when running the system with
systemd (it worked before with openrc, could check back, yes ...).
I created a brand new user to rule that out, same beha
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Humphrey [mailto:pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org]
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 9:51 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] openpty() failing with UNIX98 ptys
>
> On Sunday 27 January 2013 04:46:22 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > At so
On 27/01/13 02:06, staticsafe wrote:
I just grabbed vanilla 3.7.4 from kernel.org, the kernel build itself
went fine but when I did a modules-rebuild, the nvidia module failed to
build. As requested by the error message:
output of `emerge --info '=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-304.64'`:
http://spru
Am 29.01.2013 20:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> For now I am happy to get my itches scratched ... I am absolutely ready
> to learn and improve things. Sharing my first steps here maybe helps to
> motivate other gentoo-users to give systemd a try?
here my latest "scratches":
Took Canek's adv
32 matches
Mail list logo
