On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, João Matos wrote:
> title Gentoo Linux 3.7.1 systemd
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /boot/thekernel2 root=/dev/sda1 rootfstype=ext4 init=/bin/systemd
> vga=0x31B resume=/dev/sda3 journalctl -b
>
Why do you have "journalctl -b" in there? That makes no sense.
Also, the "
title Gentoo Linux 3.7.1 systemd
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/thekernel2 root=/dev/sda1 rootfstype=ext4 init=/bin/systemd
vga=0x31B resume=/dev/sda3 journalctl -b
2013/1/27 Mike Gilbert
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:14 PM, João Matos wrote:
> > Is there any way it is not in the "default mode"?
> >
On Sunday 27 January 2013 04:46:22 Mike Edenfield wrote:
> At some point recently, one of my systems has begun having problems
> allocating pseudo-terminals via the UNIX98 pty scheme. I am using the
> same kernel configuration I've had for years, and running the latest
> ~amd64 version of all the r
On Sat, Jan 26 2013, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I have read the news item and still have questions. The news item
> covers several points.
>
> 1. remove udev-postmount:
>I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
>udev. Is that correct?
>
> 2. Add CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y. Easy
Am 27.01.2013 22:01, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Florian Philipp
> wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp
>>> wrote:
Hi list!
Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use
On 01/27/2013 10:48 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I had something similar (details are different though):
>
> All my virt consoles went away and I couldn't get to them after X
> starts. Ctrl-Alt-F1 left the X screen as-is and it wouldn't blank and
> give me the KMS framebuffer. Ctrl-Alt-F7 brought X
> From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:49 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] openpty() failing with UNIX98 ptys
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:46:22 -0500
> "Mike Edenfield" wrote:
>
> > I have the latest udev install
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:14 PM, João Matos wrote:
> Is there any way it is not in the "default mode"?
>
Can you post your complete kernel command line?
Is there any way it is not in the "default mode"?
when it stoped, instead of hitting Ctrl D, I taped my password and
"systemctl default", so it could try to start again the default boot
process. And it worked.
I'll not try the downgrade right now bcz, after a emerge --sync, my portage
started do
2013/1/27 Canek Peláez Valdés
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM, João Matos wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/1/26 Canek Peláez Valdés
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 PM, João Matos wrote:
> >> > Hi list,
> >> >
> >> > I'm having this problem for a while, but I've decided to solve it
> know.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM, João Matos wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/1/26 Canek Peláez Valdés
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:08 PM, João Matos wrote:
>> > Hi list,
>> >
>> > I'm having this problem for a while, but I've decided to solve it know.
>> > Every time I boot my system (couple times a day)
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list!
>>>
>>> Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
>>> sys-apps/module-init-tools, does u
On 27.01.13 19:21, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> so essentially you have an nfs client that by design can't do nfs?
You could put it that way. I purchased this satellite receiver a few
days ago and upgraded to the latest firmware available (version 1.2.61
released 2013-01-07). Unfortunately, the manufac
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:46:22 -0500
"Mike Edenfield" wrote:
> At some point recently, one of my systems has begun having problems
> allocating pseudo-terminals via the UNIX98 pty scheme. I am using the
> same kernel configuration I've had for years, and running the latest
> ~amd64 version of all t
On 01/26/2013 08:46 PM, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> At some point recently, one of my systems has begun having problems
> allocating pseudo-terminals via the UNIX98 pty scheme. I am using the same
> kernel configuration I've had for years, and running the latest ~amd64
> version of all the relevant pac
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:46:30 +0100
Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 27.01.13 17:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > You config certainly looks right to me, and I don't know of any
> > config that makes it work differently.
>
> I suspected as much. The trouble is that the Pingulux is unable to
> write data
On 27.01.13 17:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> You config certainly looks right to me, and I don't know of any config
> that makes it work differently.
I suspected as much. The trouble is that the Pingulux is unable to write
data to the directories it creates. Thus, your idea of using chmod from
a cro
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:54:52 +0100
Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 27.01.13 00:04, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > What sort of client is this, and what umask is it using?
>
> The client is an Edision Argus Pingulux Plus satellite receiver.
>
> [root@stlinux]#uname -a
> Linux stlinux 2.6.32.42_stm24_V4.
Am 27.01.2013 12:33, schrieb Matthias Hanft:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
>>
>> Is it really a drop-in? I was under the impression that for example
>> `modprobe -l` is not implemented (mentioned in a comment on the eudev
>> fork on LWN). I guess that's outdated as well.
>
> I'm using kmod's modprobe,
Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> Is it really a drop-in? I was under the impression that for example
> `modprobe -l` is not implemented (mentioned in a comment on the eudev
> fork on LWN). I guess that's outdated as well.
I'm using kmod's modprobe, and there is *no* "-l" option.
-Matt
Am 26.01.2013 19:30, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
> I have read the news item and still have questions. The news item
> covers several points.
>
> 1. remove udev-postmount:
>I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
>udev. Is that correct?
>
It's a bit of a gamble but I
Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp
> wrote:
>> Hi list!
>>
>> Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
>> sys-apps/module-init-tools, does udev still load modules or is kmod a
>> required flag for that?
>
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
> 1. remove udev-postmount:
>I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
>udev. Is that correct?
Based on my experience, you just don't care about udev-postmount.
It will automagically be removed when you upgrade from udev-171
to udev-197.
-Matt
23 matches
Mail list logo
