> Hi,
>
> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>
> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
> mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount (due to my
> roo
Then use burnp6. Or burnmmx. Same packacke. No winecrap.
Am 11.12.2012 05:51 schrieb "Andrey Moshbear" :
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > run burnK7 several times:
>
> Since Bulldozer v1 and up lack 3dnow, burnK7 isn't as useful as
> sseburn or anymore.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
>
>
> run burnK7 several times:
Since Bulldozer v1 and up lack 3dnow, burnK7 isn't as useful as
sseburn or anymore.
However, sseburn does require the use of app-emulation/wine for UI
purposes, so the code will need some hacking to run
On Monday 10 December 2012 11:59 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
>
> I assisted somebody experiencing the same problem recently. The cause
> was simple: the individual concerned had added a runscript to the boot
> runlevel, whereas it should have been added to the default runlevel
> (net.eth0 in this part
On Monday 10 December 2012 09:14 PM, Salvatore Borgia wrote:
> Hi, do you have put "dolvm" option in your kernel string in grub.conf?
>
>
I'm using lilo and a static / monolithic kernel, so dolvm & grub doesn't
hold here.
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com
On Monday 10 December 2012 09:03 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 10.12.2012 15:08, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
>> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>>
>
> Please provide `/sbin/rc-u
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:51:15PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
> It's looking promising. Not that I have a horse in the race, but I
> very much like ARM's low power consumption.
There's an article on Slashdot about Intel's relatively new 22 nm
SOC (System On Chip) design...
http://hardware.slashdo
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:33:26 -0800
Grant wrote:
> > > > When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times),
> > > > they tweak
> > >
> > > It's starting to look like four (ARM this time):
> > >
> > >
> http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/12/implications-of-apple-inc-aapl-intel-corporation-intc
> > > When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times), they
> > > tweak
> >
> > It's starting to look like four (ARM this time):
> >
> >
http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/12/implications-of-apple-inc-aapl-intel-corporation-intc-break-up/
>
> I must be missing one:
>
> 68k -> POWER
> POWER -
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:10:12 -0800
Grant wrote:
> > When Apple migrate CPUs (they have now done it three times), they
> > tweak
>
> It's starting to look like four (ARM this time):
>
> http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/12/implications-of-apple-inc-aapl-intel-corporation-intc-break-up/
I must be m
> > * Linux is available for non x86 platforms. :)
>
> Only by a monumental crowd-source effort never before witnessed in the
> history of engineering.
I'm spoiled then. Gentoo's ARM support is so complete and easy to use, I
didn't realize it was a big deal. BTW, I haven't counted but it seems
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:58 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC)
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >
> >> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
> >> >
Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 20:06:58 schrieb Grant Edwards:
> On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC)
> >
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
>
On 2012-12-10, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC)
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann
>> wrote:
>> > Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
>> >
>> >> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long.
>> >> Does
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:06:36 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
> >
> >> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long.
> >> Does anyone think this won't happen?
> >
> > no
> >
On 2012-12-10, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
>>>
It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
think this
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
>>
>>> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
>>> think this won't happen?
>>
>> no
>>
>> two reasons:
>
James wrote:
Python 2.7 is my default setting.
I also had python 3.1 and 3.2 both installed.
I read about how I should get rid of 3.1 and
force those apps that need/want python 3 to use
python 3.2. (makes sense but I did not fully
research it).
So I did these steps:
emerge -C python:3.1
esel
On 2012-12-10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
>
>> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
>> think this won't happen?
>
> no
>
> two reasons:
>
> not enough power
> does not run x86 software
>
> the second on
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
Hi,
I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount
Am Samstag, 8. Dezember 2012, 19:25:55 schrieb Grant:
> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
> think this won't happen?
no
two reasons:
not enough power
does not run x86 software
the second one is a real deal breaker.
--
#163933
Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2012, 04:34:18 schrieb James:
> Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> > sensors, pwmconfig, fancontrol. No need to get the bios involved
> > (except maybe shutdown at 95°C)
>
> Sorry,
> I keep getting disconnected from this install...
>
> Does this wiki look abo
Hello!
is there a easy program i can convert emails to html? Hypermail
is little overload. Mail2Html find only as man page, Download
links not work.
Maybe this suits your needs:
https://metacpan.org/module/mailbox2html
Cheers,
Michele.
--
Michele Beltrame
http://www.italpro.net/ - m...@ital
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:30:33 -0800
Grant wrote:
> My unattended daily system maintenance procedure is like this:
>
> layman -S
> emerge --sync
> emerge -pvDuN world
> emerge -pv --depclean
> eclean -p distfiles
> eclean -p packages
>
> And then attended like this:
>
> emerge -DuN world
> revdep
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> You have neglected to mention the single most important factor
> of all:
> inertia
> Human groups are loathe to change things that already work good enough
> for something that works better. Intel works good enough.
Windows and Linux will be indistinguishabl
Hi, do you have put "dolvm" option in your kernel string in grub.conf?
2012/12/10 Nilesh Govindrajan
> Hi,
>
> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>
> The problem is, raid0 array gets recogni
Am 10.12.2012 15:08, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
> Hi,
>
> I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
> and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
>
> The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
> mount because lvm doesn
Hi,
I have a raid0 (kernel autodetect) array, over which I have put LVM
and then there are volumes on the LVM for /var, /tmp, swap and /home.
The problem is, raid0 array gets recognized, but localmount fails to
mount because lvm doesn't seem to start before localmount (due to my
root being on SSD
In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
> * Helmut Jarausch [121206 09:27]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on one of several machines I have a problem with initramfs.
>>
>> The machine has a single SATA drive. When the kernel boots it shows
>> that it is called /dev/sda,
>> Now, within the init script of my initra
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:27:03AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >
> > This is an incredibly inefficient way of testing for broken symlinks,
> > it
> > takes about 100 times as long to run (over ten seconds on my netbook)
> > than
> >
> > find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l
>
> What about
> ap
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:27:03AM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >
> > This is an incredibly inefficient way of testing for broken symlinks,
> > it
> > takes about 100 times as long to run (over ten seconds on my netbook)
> > than
> >
> > find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l
>
> What about
> ap
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:27:03 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > find -L /usr/share/man/ -type l
>
> What about
> app-misc/symlinks ?
That's good for finding them too, and particularly good at cleaning them
up.
--
Neil Bothwick
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
signa
On 12/10/2012 09:50:04 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:37:37 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I'm affected by a bug that seems to affect only some Gentoo users.
> dev-libs/openssl seems to install broken symlinks for some of its
man
> pages. You can check with:
Nothing here
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:37:37 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I'm affected by a bug that seems to affect only some Gentoo users.
> dev-libs/openssl seems to install broken symlinks for some of its man
> pages. You can check with:
Nothing here on two boxes.
>find /usr/share/man/ -type l !
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:30:33PM -0800, Grant wrote:
> And then attended like this:
>
> emerge -DuN world
> revdep-rebuild
> etc-update
> elogv
> emerge --depclean
> eclean distfiles
> eclean packages
>
> Am I missing any good stuff?
I've recently modified update[1] to use --changed-use by de
35 matches
Mail list logo
