I need to be able to install only certain packages from a layman overlay so
I do stuff like this:
package.mask:
*/*::perl-experimental
package.unmask:
perl-core/CPAN::perl-experimental
This really freaks out eix-test-obsolete. Does anyone know of a way to
install only certain packages from a la
Dale wrote:
> That's been my experience too. I run @preserved-rebuild when it tells
> me to but revdep-rebuild rarely finds anything. Thing is, it has a
> time or two. It is best to run revdep-rebuild and be sure than not to
> and run the risk of not being able to boot or some other problem that
>
2012/12/9 Grant :
> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
> think this won't happen?
No， it won't.
>
> - Grant
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Grant wrote:
> It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
> think this won't happen?
It's looking promising. Not that I have a horse in the race, but I
very much like ARM's low power consumption. The way I see it, they're
only a sh
It seems like ARM processors will destroy x86 before too long. Does anyone
think this won't happen?
- Grant
Moin,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
> As soon as i mount an ext4 partition on my second 1To HDD, the hard drive
> is always working (read/write) every second (even when doing nothing).
>
> This problem appears only with /dev/sda5 and /dev/sda6 and stops when
> u
> > BTW, what should I do about this:
> >
> > # revdep-rebuild -p
> > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild
> >
> > * Checking reverse dependencies
> > * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package
> > update
> > * will be emerged.
> >
> > * Collecting system b
On Saturday 08 December 2012 22:49:50 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> ... revdep-rebuild is still useful as a fallback, but the main reason
> I run it from my weekly system check script is as a sanity check. It
> rarely finds anything.
Not quite never, though. I still find it useful.
--
Rgds
Peter
Grant wrote:
> > > I think you're right about that. Can I configure eclean to wait a
> > > certain number of days since a package was removed before cleaning it?
> > > Even if I only run it once per week, it could remove a package that
> > > was updated yesterday that I find out I need tomorrow.
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> # BOOLEAN
>> # This variable is only used for delayed substitution in COLORSCHEME{,_ALT}.
>> # If true, the "dark" color schemes (for black background) are selected.
>> DARK=true
>>
>> # STRING
>> # If TERM_ALT does not match,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:54:25 -0800, Grant wrote:
>
>> Got it. So @preserved-rebuild is meant to be a replacement for
>> revdep-rebuild
> No, it is a means of preventing the problems that revdep-rebuild fixes.
>
> If revdep-rebuild were a medicine, @preserved-rebuild would be
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:54:25 -0800, Grant wrote:
> Got it. So @preserved-rebuild is meant to be a replacement for
> revdep-rebuild
No, it is a means of preventing the problems that revdep-rebuild fixes.
If revdep-rebuild were a medicine, @preserved-rebuild would be a vaccine.
Which you choose t
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> # BOOLEAN
> # This variable is only used for delayed substitution in COLORSCHEME{,_ALT}.
> # If true, the "dark" color schemes (for black background) are selected.
> DARK=true
>
> # STRING
> # If TERM_ALT does not match, this chooses the correspondi
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:54:25 -0800
Grant wrote:
> > > > So they are not really the same thing at all.I'm not saying
> > > > they're the same, I'm saying it looks like @preserved-rebuild
> > > > does a subset of the things revdep-rebuild does. Why run
> > > > @preserved-rebuild followed by revdep-
> > I think you're right about that. Can I configure eclean to wait a
> > certain number of days since a package was removed before cleaning it?
> > Even if I only run it once per week, it could remove a package that
> > was updated yesterday that I find out I need tomorrow.
> >
> > - Grant
>
>
>
> > > So they are not really the same thing at all.I'm not saying they're
> > > the same, I'm saying it looks like @preserved-rebuild does a subset
> > > of the things revdep-rebuild does. Why run @preserved-rebuild
> > > followed by revdep-rebuild if the end result is the same as running
> > > re
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:07:28 -0800
Grant wrote:
> > So they are not really the same thing at all.I'm not saying they're
> > the same, I'm saying it looks like @preserved-rebuild does a subset
> > of the things revdep-rebuild does. Why run @preserved-rebuild
> > followed by revdep-rebuild if the e
> > > The logic is:
> > >
> > > Rebuild busted packages that portage already knows about
> > > (@preserved-rebuild), then get rid of oudated packages and finally
> > > revdep-rebuild to fix anything that --depclean broke.
> > >
> > > @preserved-rebuild is getting very good at what it does lately
>
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:56:18 -0800
Grant wrote:
> > > My unattended daily system maintenance procedure is like this:
> > >
> > > layman -S
> > > emerge --sync
> > > emerge -pvDuN world
> > > emerge -pv --depclean
> > > eclean -p distfiles
> > > eclean -p packages
> > >
> > > And then attended like
2012/12/8 Florian Philipp
> >
> > 2012/12/8 Nikos Chantziaras mailto:rea...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > On 08/12/12 16:36, Jacques Montier wrote:
> >
> > As soon as i mount an ext4 partition on my second 1To HDD,
> > the hard drive is always working (read/write) every second
> >
>
> 2012/12/8 Nikos Chantziaras mailto:rea...@gmail.com>>
>
> On 08/12/12 16:36, Jacques Montier wrote:
>
> As soon as i mount an ext4 partition on my second 1To HDD,
> the hard drive is always working (read/write) every second
> (even when doing nothing).
>
>
> Coul
I don't have Nepomuk, but maybe any other indexing service ? I don't know...
I tried to look at the processes with top and mounting /unmounting
/dev/sda5 ; i haven't seen any difference...
thank you Nikos,
--
Jacques
2012/12/8 Nikos Chantziaras
> On 08/12/12 16:36, Jacques Montier wrote:
>
>>
On 08/12/12 16:36, Jacques Montier wrote:
As soon as i mount an ext4 partition on my second 1To HDD, the hard
drive is always working (read/write) every second (even when doing nothing).
Could it be a disk indexing service, like KDE's Nepomuk?
121207 Dale wrote:
> Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
>> it seems setting DARK=true in .eixrc
>> fixes the problem of the almost black on black background for me
I just ran into this problem updating to 0.27.5-r1 & that's the solution.
--
,,==
On 08/12/12 13:31, Jarry wrote:
I just noticed some strange message when shutting down my server:
...
* Bringing down interface eth0
* Caching network module dependencies
need firewalld
* Removing addresses
...
What does that "need firewalld" mean? Why should it be needed?
AFAIK net-firewal
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:33:17 +0100, Francesco Turco wrote:
> I wonder if there's some way to fix this, perhaps by telling Portage to
> update modification time for distfiles when they are fetched from
> servers. Or using some other option with eclean.
It sounds like you want wget to use --no-use-
Hi,
As soon as i mount an ext4 partition on my second 1To HDD, the hard drive
is always working (read/write) every second (even when doing nothing).
Here is my fstab :
sdb is a SSD and sda HDD.
# SSD
/dev/sdb1 /bootext2noatime,discard
1 2
/dev/sdb2 /
Hello.
I usually use the following commands to clean distfiles and binary
packages after an upgrade:
# eclean --destructive distfiles
# eclean --destructive packages
Now I'd like to add the --time-limit=1w option, in order to prevent
recent files to be deleted. I think this would be useful for h
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:56:18 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > @preserved-rebuild is getting very good at what it does lately
> > (supported in all recent portage version including stable IIRC), as is
> > --depclean, so revdep-rebuild seldom finds anything to do these days.
> If revdep-rebuild does everythi
Hi Gentoo-users,
I just noticed some strange message when shutting down my server:
...
* Bringing down interface eth0
* Caching network module dependencies
need firewalld
* Removing addresses
...
What does that "need firewalld" mean? Why should it be needed?
AFAIK net-firewall/firewalld is
On Friday 07 December 2012 20:06:42 Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
> ah this is on KDE then? im currently using xfce4
Yep, it's on KDE. Anyone experiences similar?
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Patrick Holthaus <
> patrick.holth...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 December 2012 17:16:21
On Saturday 08 Dec 2012 08:19:18 victor romanchuk wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 05:26 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 03 Dec 2012 10:53:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> Any ideas? I also have a Windows Guest (Host settings Pulseaudio/Intel
> >> HD Audio) and the sound works there without problems.
> >
> > If
On 12/07/2012 05:26 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 03 Dec 2012 10:53:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Any ideas? I also have a Windows Guest (Host settings Pulseaudio/Intel
>> HD Audio) and the sound works there without problems.
> If you're running the binary VBox package I seem to recall that sound was
33 matches
Mail list logo
