On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:22 PM, David Kuhl wrote:
> When running genkernel all on the latest source 3.3.8 I get the following
> error.
You're not the only one. It looks (to me) like a bug in busybox when
one attempts to compile it against =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.3.8. I
filed a bug report o
When running genkernel all on the latest source 3.3.8 I get the following error.
CC util-linux/mkfs_ext2.o
CC util-linux/volume_id/ocfs2.o
util-linux/mkfs_ext2.c:51:27: fatal error: linux/ext2_fs.h: No such
file or directory
compilation terminated.
When I do a find the ext2_fs.h is foun
I have a problem building the kernel too. I use genkernel with source
3.2.1 but the latest --sync brought in 3.3.8 which builds the kernel
but fails on building the initramsfs. Something about now finding an
ext2 header; however, when I searched for it I found in in the source
tree. Do I need to
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:32:45 -0400
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:35:50 +0700
> > Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >
> >> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your
> >> infrastructure?
> >
> > Nope, that a murmur, not a pe
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:14:01 -0400
David Kuhl wrote:
> I just upgraged my gentoo box after three months and now when I run
> startx X fails. This has happened before, but all I had to do was
> update my x11 drivers and it would work.I use evdev and don't have
> a xorg.conf file. Below is the
I just upgraged my gentoo box after three months and now when I run
startx X fails. This has happened before, but all I had to do was
update my x11 drivers and it would work.I use evdev and don't have
a xorg.conf file. Below is the xorg-server installed, qlist of x11
drivers, the lspci -k out
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:13:09 +0200
Jarry wrote:
> >> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: In function âdefault_do_nmiâ:
> >> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:509:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> ânmi_watchdog_tickâ
> >> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:512:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> âdo_nmi
On 01-Jul-12 20:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
CC arch/x86/kernel/process_64.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/signal.o
AS arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o
CC arch/x86/kernel/traps.o
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: In function âdefault_do_nmiâ:
arch/x86
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:32:45 -0400
Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your
> infrastructure?
>
Being just a user of Linux desktop applications the leap-second issue
has no relevance to my activities.
However, I have read in several places that any potenti
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:35:50 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your
>> infrastructure?
>
> Nope, that a murmur, not a peep, barely even a log entry anywhere. And
> no whinging customers (surpri
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:35:50 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your
> infrastructure?
Nope, that a murmur, not a peep, barely even a log entry anywhere. And
no whinging customers (surprisingly!) Our ntp servers just synced with
the upstream stratum and
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your infrastructure?
>
> Did you do something special (like Google did) to prevent chaos?
>
> 'Leap Second' Bug Wreaks Havoc Across Web | Wired Enterprise | Wired.com
> http://m.wired.com/wire
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Just wondering... did Saturday's "Leap Second" bit your infrastructure?
>
> Did you do something special (like Google did) to prevent chaos?
>
> 'Leap Second' Bug Wreaks Havoc Across Web | Wired Enterprise | Wired.com
> http://m.wired.com/wire
Am 02.07.2012 13:27, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
> On 02.07.2012 13:09, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2012 11:34, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>>> Runs OK now. Gotta check the advantages now.
>
>> One issue:
>
>> I had to set
>
>> GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true
>
>> in /etc/defa
Am 02.07.2012 13:27, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
> I've successfully build (and installed) grub-2.0 with gcc-4.7.1
> (hardened, not vanilla) and UUID works for me. Have you tried
> revdep-rebuild/ emerge @preserved-rebuild ?
Yes, sure. revdep-rebuild found nothing related.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.07.2012 13:09, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 02.07.2012 11:34, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
>> Runs OK now. Gotta check the advantages now.
>
> One issue:
>
> I had to set
>
> GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true
>
> in /etc/default/grub
>
>
Am 02.07.2012 11:34, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Runs OK now. Gotta check the advantages now.
One issue:
I had to set
GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true
in /etc/default/grub
because at boot-time I always hit a nasty issue around blkid.
It can't find libgcc_s.so.1 somehow.
I rebuilt buysbox, ut
On 2 July 2012 05:41, Philip Webb wrote:
> 120701 Philip Webb wrote:
>> Well, the simpler alternative in my case wb to use the UoT service.
>> I can 'ssh' into a CLI on the CHASS machine, which runs Irix,
>> then use 'wget' from there with a very fast connection.
>> Downloading a file from there t
Am 02.07.2012 00:14, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> but, as far as I know, I don't need them ... yet.
>
> If it is an easy migration/upgrade, ok, why not?
>
> Otherwise, thanks ...
Call me a liar ;-)
Upgraded and migrated today ... took me a few reboots with GRUB1 (on
another hdd) to get thos
19 matches
Mail list logo