On Wed, February 1, 2012 6:36 am, Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, January 31, 2012 6:30 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
> Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office "how long before someone makes
> a
pointless, unr
On Thu, February 2, 2012 2:08 am, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
>
> Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
> I should upgrade even if the "funny" turns out to be just a config error
> on my laptop.
>
> This is a home
On 02/01/2012 07:36 AM, Dale wrote:
When 3.1 came out, I changed jobs. Swapping 15 floppies is no fun to
me. Funny, reinstalling fixed the problems back then and it still is
the best way to fix windoze.
I installed a Windows 95 beta from floppies :-) Microsoft shipped them
DMF formatted (1.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:31:13PM -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> > From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:06 PM
>
>
> > Your reply made me think of something. I had a XP reinstall once that
> > required a number from MS because of the new mobo and hard
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:01:09PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:41:29AM -0600, Dale wrote
> >
> [...major snippage...]
> >
> > So basically, WINDOZE SUCKS LOL
>
> Actually, some Windows *DEVELOPERS* suck.
Reminds me of the “Ballmer peak”: http://xkcd.com/323/
-
> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:43 PM
>
> Mike Edenfield wrote:
> >> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:39 PM
> >>
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard d
On 02/02/2012, at 11:02, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01 2012, bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2012, at 9:08, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
>>>
>>> Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 10
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
>>
>> Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
>> I should upgrade even if the "funny" turns out to
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
>
> Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
> I should upgrade even if the "funny" turns out to be just a config error
> on my laptop.
>
> This is a home s
Mike Edenfield wrote:
>> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:06 PM
>
>
>> Your reply made me think of something. I had a XP reinstall once that
>> required a number from MS because of the new mobo and hard drive. They
>> said it recognized the change
On Wed, Feb 01 2012, bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2012, at 9:08, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
>>
>> Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
>> I should upgrade even if the "funny" turns out to be jus
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:41:29AM -0600, Dale wrote
>>
> [...major snippage...]
>>
>> So basically, WINDOZE SUCKS LOL
>
> Actually, some Windows *DEVELOPERS* suck. It's equivalant to some
> linux developers assuming that /usr is mounted
Mike Edenfield wrote:
>> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:39 PM
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard drive went
>> out. We ordered a new one and installed it. Then he realized he didn't
>> have the restore
You can expect best case of 50% thru put for wifi (I.e., 50Mbs), and usually
much less. Think overhead for encryption, error recovery, and speed reduction
for distance. Add to that most wifi speeds on the box come from the marketing
department ...
Then, if you are in a crowded (rf wise) envir
> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:06 PM
> Your reply made me think of something. I had a XP reinstall once that
> required a number from MS because of the new mobo and hard drive. They
> said it recognized the change in the serial numbers. When I
> From: Dale [mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:39 PM
>
> Howdy,
>
> I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard drive went
> out. We ordered a new one and installed it. Then he realized he didn't
> have the restore discs. We ordered those fr
I have a linksys wrt54G that is acting a little funny.
Since my new laptop supports 1Gig wired ethernet and the wrt is 100Meg,
I should upgrade even if the "funny" turns out to be just a config error
on my laptop.
This is a home system.
My requirements are modest.
1. >= 4 wired ethernet ports
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard drive went
>> out. We ordered a new one and installed it. Then he realized he didn't
>> have the restore discs. We ordered those from Gateway. I went
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:41:29AM -0600, Dale wrote
>
[...major snippage...]
>
> So basically, WINDOZE SUCKS LOL
Actually, some Windows *DEVELOPERS* suck. It's equivalant to some
linux developers assuming that /usr is mounted at the very beginning of
the boot process, so that their cod
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard drive went
> out. We ordered a new one and installed it. Then he realized he didn't
> have the restore discs. We ordered those from Gateway. I went up today
> and tried to ins
Howdy,
I got a neighbour that has a computer issue. First, the hard drive went
out. We ordered a new one and installed it. Then he realized he didn't
have the restore discs. We ordered those from Gateway. I went up today
and tried to install winders 7 on the new drive. I put the system disc
>> I do get this when emerging gcc-4.3.4:
>>
>> * Your x86 arch is not supported.
>> * Hope you know what you are doing. Hardened will not work.
>
> Are you upgrading from a non-hardened system?
Nope, just upgrading gcc on a system that's always been hardened.
- Grant
On 02/01/2012 01:06 PM, Grant wrote:
> I do get this when emerging gcc-4.3.4:
>
> * Your x86 arch is not supported.
> * Hope you know what you are doing. Hardened will not work.
Are you upgrading from a non-hardened system?
On 02/01/2012 08:01 AM, Grant wrote:
> I get this when emerging python on a system I'm bringing up to date
> after 3 years of non-use:
>
> *** WARNING: renaming "dbm" since importing it failed:
> /usr/lib/libgdbm_compat.so.3: undefined symbol: __guard
I've never run a hardened machine, though it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.02.2012 21:33, pat wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:16:18 +0100, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote On
> 01.02.2012 00:34, pat wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:34:36 +0100, pat wrote
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:49:33 +1100, Adam Carter wrote
>> T
on 02/01/2012 11:21 PM Matthias Krebs wrote the following:
> On 02/01/2012 10:05 AM, Thanasis wrote:
>> Has anyone ever seen the following strange behaviour?
>> While updating the system with emerge, after each installation of a
>> package, before it starts emerging the next one, it pauses for a mi
On 02/01/2012 10:05 AM, Thanasis wrote:
Has anyone ever seen the following strange behaviour?
While updating the system with emerge, after each installation of a
package, before it starts emerging the next one, it pauses for a minute
or two, then displays "alarm signal" (without the quotes) on a
>> The gcc package actually compiles gcc twice, once with your existing
>
>> compiler and again with the new compiler itself (at least it worked that
>
>> way in the old days).
>
>
>
> I believe it's three times now: the first time with the old compiler, then
> with the new one, then again with the
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:16:18 +0100, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01.02.2012 00:34, pat wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:34:36 +0100, pat wrote
> >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:49:33 +1100, Adam Carter wrote
> >>> There were a few kernels that br
I get this when emerging python on a system I'm bringing up to date
after 3 years of non-use:
*** WARNING: renaming "dbm" since importing it failed:
/usr/lib/libgdbm_compat.so.3: undefined symbol: __guard
The compile eventually fails with:
Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Dale wrote:
>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, January 31, 2012 6:30 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
>> Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office "how long before someone makes a
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, January 31, 2012 6:30 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:05:12PM +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote
> Sweet. I had 15 minutes in the office "how long before someone makes a
pointless, unrelated
Has anyone ever seen the following strange behaviour?
While updating the system with emerge, after each installation of a
package, before it starts emerging the next one, it pauses for a minute
or two, then displays "alarm signal" (without the quotes) on a new line,
and continues to emerging the ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.02.2012 00:34, pat wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:34:36 +0100, pat wrote
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:49:33 +1100, Adam Carter wrote
>>> There were a few kernels that broke iwlagn. Iirc it was 3.1.5
>>> and 3.1.6. So
>> i'd suggest you stick to tro
34 matches
Mail list logo
