On Dec 13, 2011 11:56 AM, "Grant Edwards" wrote:
>
> On 2011-12-13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > I'm sure they are. In the interview [1], Lameter said that
> > NASDAQ uses a modified version of the Gentoo Linux distribution.
> >
> >
> > "modified version"? That practically screams "ricers!" to me
On 12/12/2011 06:15 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
$ fsck -vf /dev/sda5
[..]
655360 inodes used (100.00%)
[..]
$ find /gentoo -xdev | wc -l
655338
That's really disappointing. I was using reiser3fs and XFS before, and
they didn't have that kind of limitation... Uhm... not meant as a rant -
I lik
On 2011-12-13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> I'm sure they are. In the interview [1], Lameter said that
> NASDAQ uses a modified version of the Gentoo Linux distribution.
>
>
> "modified version"? That practically screams "ricers!" to me :-D
I didn't know there was such a thing as "unmodified" Gentoo.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:03:32AM +, James Broadhead wrote
> So on returning to this machine, I see that another USB disk that I
> have connected to it is also having those messages printed about it.
> This leads me to suspect that it's either an ext4 bug or the situation
> that you mentioned
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:30:32AM +, Mick wrote
> Unless you are using a new radeon card you may need
> sys-kernel/linux-firmware instead of radeon-ucode.
As I mentioned in my reply to Michael Mol, building mesa with the
"llvm" USE flag does the trick.
It appears the web pages http://ww
On Dec 13, 2011 7:09 AM, "James Broadhead" wrote:
>
> On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >>On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >>((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrast
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0100, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >> On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> /var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> again, though i
On 12/12/11 21:52, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, 13:28:39 schrieb Joseph:
On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>> Configuring source in
>> /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executa
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:03 PM, James Broadhead
wrote:
>> Does it happen to be a >2TB USB drive? I remember reading about
>> problems with some of those. It works in Windows with the factory
>> partition/FAT tables because of tricks they do to the addressing that
>> works in Windows, but once you
On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ((No wonder NASDAQ uses Gentoo for its infrastructure))
>>
>
> Indeed
What a bunch of ricers :P
On 12 December 2011 20:55, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James Broadhead
> wrote:
>>
>> Apologies; the correct message is:
>> grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device
>> sdb1
>>
>> This appears 42 times immediately following mount.
>>
>>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
>- >8 snip
>
> >
> > I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the
> > same way since they have the same kernel, however,
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:23:16 +0100
Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Same here. All my server VMs work just fine with parallel enabled.
> > There's nothing complex in them, they tend to be single-service
> > machines.
> >
>
> Don't tell me you reboot your servers so often that it is necessary to
> t
> I've looked at the kernel code that causes the error message. It
> verifies that this is most likely a dead disk:
It would be worth running smartctl from smartmontools to see what it
knows of the disks status.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:32:04AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
> llvm is pulled in on most of my systems as a dependency of something
> else. It doesn't conflict with having gcc installed.
>
> emerge sys-devel/llvm
>
> And try again. If that fixes it, you should file a bug against the
> specific pa
Am 12.12.2011 09:43, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:29:16 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to
OpenRC a year+(?) ago.
>>>
>>> You are not a representative sample.
>>>
>>
>> worksforme
>>
>> In production servers, e
Am 12.12.2011 21:33, schrieb James Broadhead:
> On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead wrote:
>> ext4: "fill_buffer on unknown block out of range"
>
> Apologies; the correct message is:
> grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device
> sdb1
>
> This appears 42
> # echo | gcc -dM -E - -march=native
> /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/cc1 -E -quiet -v -
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -mtune=i686 -march=x86-64
Sorry, something went wrong while pasting this lines, here are the
correct ones:
# cc -mtune=i686 -E -v - &1 | grep cc1
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-
>> No nothing crazy:
>> CFLAGS="-Os -pipe -mtune=i686"
>
> i686? That's not amd64. You need something 64bit. Just use march=native
> instead of mtune=i686.
Wait, what! I could swear I was reading march=native just a few minutes ago.
mtune=i686 on amd64 just doesn't seem right, but it should co
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James Broadhead
wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead wrote:
>> ext4: "fill_buffer on unknown block out of range"
>
> Apologies; the correct message is:
> grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device
> sdb1
>
> This ap
Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, 13:28:39 schrieb Joseph:
> On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> >> Configuring source in
> >> /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
> >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> >> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is
> No nothing crazy:
> CFLAGS="-Os -pipe -mtune=i686"
No you're right, that's nothing crazy.
Perhaps you could paste the complete build log of your failed merge to
pastebin[1].
Portage tells you where you can find that log file. The output of %
emerge --info might prove useful too.
[1] http://pas
On 12/12/11 14:29, Dale wrote:
[snip}
gcc-config -l
Then you can use gcc-config to set it if it
is not set. If it is set, it should look like this:
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.5.3 *
Note the little * on the end? That is the one that it is trying to
use. Some
On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead wrote:
> ext4: "fill_buffer on unknown block out of range"
Apologies; the correct message is:
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device sdb1
This appears 42 times immediately following mount.
Running picasa today, it i
Joseph wrote:
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I fi
On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
--enable-cross-compile option.
Only do this if y
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I figured out the s
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I"m trying to install "kino" but ffmpeg fails to compile:
>
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
>
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
> Configuring source in
> /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
> --enable-cross-compile option.
> Only do this if you know what cross compiling mean
I"m trying to install "kino" but ffmpeg fails to compile:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the --enable-cross-compile
option
> mysql -u phpmyadmin -p
> Enter password: ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user
> 'phpmyadmin'@'localhost'
The ting about mysql is, that it's not enough to just create a user and
give him a password. you also have to grant this user access to the
database you wish to connect to.
Last thing i
On 12/12/11 11:17, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Joseph wrote:
I have this strange problem with phpmyadmin, error:
The phpMyAdmin configuration storage is not completely configured, some
extended features have been deactivated. To find out why click here.
I solve it in
On 12/12/11 18:10, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Does the mysql user 'phpmyadmin' exist, and does he have access to the
mysql database 'phpmyadmin'? Have you tried connection manually to the
phpmyadmin db?
Yes, user phpmyadmin exists but when I try to connect to database I get error:
mysql -u phpmya
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Joseph wrote:
> I have this strange problem with phpmyadmin, error:
> The phpMyAdmin configuration storage is not completely configured, some
> extended features have been deactivated. To find out why click here.
>
> I solve it in the past by generating phpmyadmin
Does the mysql user 'phpmyadmin' exist, and does he have access to the
mysql database 'phpmyadmin'? Have you tried connection manually to the
phpmyadmin db?
I have this strange problem with phpmyadmin, error:
The phpMyAdmin configuration storage is not completely configured, some extended features
have been deactivated. To find out why click here.
I solve it in the past by generating phpmyadmin database and controluser, instruction in
this link:
On 12.12.2011 15:54, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Joseph writes:
>> That is scary. I just install new HD with 2TB capacity and ext4 that is
>> 2% full and:
>> $ find /home/joseph/ -xdev | wc -l
>> shows: 169977 that is 26% full.
> No, that is 26% of the number of total inodes _Daniel_ has on his small
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:27 PM, James wrote:
> Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> I use Kdenlive for GUI (which uses MLT as backend) and my camcorder is
>> Canon HG-10. It uses AVCHD, Kdenlive/MLT handles it beautifully.
>
>
> thanks.
>
> I replied to this yesterday, but I guess Gmane
> was
Joseph writes:
> On 12/12/11 12:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> >Hello :)
> >
> >I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> >/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> >move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> >a
On Dec 12, 2011 9:39 PM, "Joseph" wrote:
>
> Quick googling around indicates that JFS, or XFS don't have these
limitation.
> -quote
> Many computer programs used by system administrators in UNIX operating
systems often designate files with inode numbers. Examples include popular
disk i
Quick googling around indicates that JFS, or XFS don't have these limitation.
-quote
Many computer programs used by system administrators in UNIX operating systems often designate files with inode numbers. Examples include popular disk
integrity checking utilities such as the fsck or
On 12/12/11 12:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Hello :)
I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
again, though it has free blocks. B
ext4: "fill_buffer on unknown block out of range"
I have seen a number of these appearing in my dmesg recently for a
new-ish external disk. I'm afraid that it's a paraphrase, as I am away
from the machine at present.
ckfs.ext4 -f comes back clean and smartmontools reports nothing out
of the ord
Daniel Troeder writes:
> I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
> /var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
> move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
> again, though it has free blocks. But no inodes are left
Hello :)
I have an ext4-filesystem that contains /usr/src, the /usr/portage and
/var/cache/edb. It previously also contained /var/db/pkg, but I had to
move that some weeks ago, because the fs was "full". Now it's "full"
again, though it has free blocks. But no inodes are left:
$ fsck -vf /dev/sda
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:26:55 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Another lesson learned.
> > I went for easy way out, tar.gz /var/* directory copy it to another
> > machine.
>
> The "-p" option will preserve ownership and permissions. You need to add
> it to both compressing and extracting.
That's
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2011, 00:13 +0100 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:36:32AM -0200, luis jure wrote:
>
> > >As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
> >
> > i haven't used text browsers for some time now, but i definitely
> prefered
> > links over lynx
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:29:16 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > It's worked for me ever since I switched all of my machines to
> > > OpenRC a year+(?) ago.
> >
> > You are not a representative sample.
> >
>
> worksforme
>
> In production servers, even. Virtualized on top of XenServer. All of
> the
49 matches
Mail list logo
