On 22/06/11 08:29, Thanasis wrote:
> on 06/22/2011 08:46 AM justin wrote the following:
>
>> One little note,
>>
>> if portage requests that you should install dev-lang/ifc instead of
>> gcc[fortran], you most probably have an entry
>>
>> sys-devel/gcc -fortran
>>
>> in
>>
>> your /etc/portage/pac
on 06/22/2011 08:46 AM justin wrote the following:
> One little note,
>
> if portage requests that you should install dev-lang/ifc instead of
> gcc[fortran], you most probably have an entry
>
> sys-devel/gcc -fortran
>
> in
>
> your /etc/portage/package.use
>
> Just remove that.
>
I didn't
On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote:
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit
userland_GNU
* FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
* Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran.
* If yo
on 06/22/2011 06:55 AM Dale wrote the following:
> Heads up for folks about to do their updates, check into the USE flag
> fortran to see if you need to add it to yours before updating a bunch of
> stuff.
I noticed that if you don't add fortran to your USE flags and something
needs fortran, unless
On 22/06/11 07:25, justin wrote:
> On 22/06/11 06:31, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>> On 06/21/11 23:55, Dale wrote:
>>> I just did my updates and ran into this:
>>>
>>> * Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
>>> * USE:amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib
>>> policykit userland_GNU
>>> * FE
On Wednesday 22 Jun 2011 03:03:34 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this morning I got a block while updateing:
> upower and hal cannot be installed at the same time:
>
> * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> * installed at the same time on the same system.
>
>
On 22/06/11 06:31, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On 06/21/11 23:55, Dale wrote:
>> I just did my updates and ran into this:
>>
>> * Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
>> * USE:amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib
>> policykit userland_GNU
>> * FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
>>
>> * P
On 06/21/11 23:55, Dale wrote:
> I just did my updates and ran into this:
>
> * Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
> * USE:amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib
> policykit userland_GNU
> * FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
>
> * Please install currently selected gcc version with U
I just did my updates and ran into this:
* Maintainer: s...@gentoo.org
* USE:amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib
policykit userland_GNU
* FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox
* Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran.
* If you intend to use a diff
On 06/22/2011 05:03 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
My question is:
How can I identify _installed_ packages, which needs hal?
I find that the most reliable way is: emerge -pv --depclean sys-apps/hal
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this morning I got a block while updateing:
upower and hal cannot be installed at the same time:
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(sys-apps/hal-0.5.14-r4, installed) pulled i
On 06/21/11 22:03, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> With
>
> quse hal
>
> I get ALL packages in portage, which has the hal use flag.
> That is too much ...hrmmm... info...
>
> If possible I want to remove hal from my system...
> Any better way to do this?
>
> Thank you very much for any help!
> Best r
Hi,
this morning I got a block while updateing:
upower and hal cannot be installed at the same time:
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(sys-apps/hal-0.5.14-r4, installed) pulled in by
sys-apps/hal required b
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, 07:12:30 schrieb Mick:
> I'm running KDE4.6.3 stable and Kmail 1.12.7
kdepim-4.6.0 includes kmail 2.1.0. Try this one, if you're brave. But you have
been warned :)
Michael
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, 01:40:47 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Today, kmail hung while accessing my Exchange account over IMAP. The
> folder list showed 100+ unread mails, but none of them were in the
> view pane. Deleting that account and recreating it brought everything
> back.
I was hitten by th
Alan McKinnon writes:
> I'm having the devil's own time with kdepim after upgrading to 4.6.0.
Me too. But I still did not have any time to investigate this, so I live
without kmail for the moment. Thunderbird also sucks big time, but I
just live with it. I thought about downgrading the whole KDEP
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 16:36:32 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Point taken about s/S. I didn't know there was an accepted standard to
> use 's'.
Come to think of it, it may not apply to you (in which case apologies): it's
an SI unit.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
>
> Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
> on something much faster than DSL? In either
On 04/21/2011 01:55 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
If i run ethtool on a vlan interface, does it show layer 1 or layer 2
"link"?
IIRC ciscos will report "line proto down" if layer 1 is up but layer 2/vlan
is down. How is the status of layer 2 determined?
FastEthernet0/0 is administratively down, lin
Hi guys,
since some time, my Laptop switch the CPU-Freq very strange. It turns
down under high load. I detected this error under 3 different Linux
Distribution.
I'm not sure about it, so i asking: Has someone else with a Intel Core2
CPU T5600 that kind of problem?
Greeting's Akendo
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
on something much faster than DSL? In either case the S's ought to be s's.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 00:09:25 Dale wrote:
Maybe it is stable and should work.
It isn't, and it doesn't. It only displays one run-level per service.
That may be why it is not documented yet then. I hope that the OP now
knows to use the old way. Where
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 01:28:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
> I get about 8MB/S download but only about 250KB/S upload.
Should those B's be b's? In other words, bits instead of bytes? Or are you
on something much faster than DSL? In either case the S's ought to be s's.
On ADSL I get about 900KB/s down
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2011 18:02:54 Dale wrote:
Yea, I have a 3 lb mini sledge hammer. I sometimes put it right beside
my puter and give it a evil look with the one good eye I got. If that
don't work, I ask on here. o_O If that don't work, I put the hammer
to work. S
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:28:05PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> >> into 100 100MB files to transfer ove
On Monday 20 June 2011 18:02:54 Dale wrote:
> Yea, I have a 3 lb mini sledge hammer. I sometimes put it right beside
> my puter and give it a evil look with the one good eye I got. If that
> don't work, I ask on here. o_O If that don't work, I put the hammer
> to work. So far, the hammer has
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:36:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I like the irony of the sig sometimes. I know a couple times your sig
> seemed to be foreseeing the future on a problem being discussed.
> Others have even mentioned it before too. Makes one wonder.
The spooky way that the tagline sometimes see
on 06/21/2011 02:09 AM Dale wrote the following:
> This may be pointless since the OP seems to have disappeared.
Might he be just a chinese spammer?
On Monday 20 June 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mark Knecht
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB
> > file into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync,
> > and then use cat to reassemble?
>
> I think it sh
On Tuesday 21 Jun 2011 00:40:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Before, I beginning, I need dox, not solutions :-)
>
> I'm having the devil's own time with kdepim after upgrading to 4.6.0.
>
> Apart from the calendar (more on this later), everything seemed fine.
> Several kontact restarts and several rebo
30 matches
Mail list logo