On 01/13/11 01:37, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Jake Moe wrote:
>> I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
>> fine, I can mount the filesystem and read them. Data and Video DVDs
>> seem to work fine as well. But when I try to listen to an aud
On 01/12/11 20:29, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Monday 10 January 2011 10:48:56 Jake Moe wrote:
>> I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
>> fine, I can mount the filesystem and read them. Data and Video DVDs
>> seem to work fine as well. But when I try to listen to an au
On 01/12/11 14:53, James Wall wrote:
> On 01/11/11 12:52, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Jake Moe wrote:
>
> >> On 01/11/11 04:38, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >>> Hi Jake,
> >>>
> >>> Jake Moe wrote:
> >>>
> I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
> fine, I can mount the
On 01/12/11 04:52, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Jake Moe wrote:
>> On 01/11/11 04:38, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Hi Jake,
>>>
>>> Jake Moe wrote:
I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
fine, I can mount the filesystem and read them. Data and Video DVDs
seem to w
On 01/12/2011 10:57 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>>
>> If not BIOS then I'd look at kernel config next.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>
> If it helps here's my 2.6.36-r6 .config.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
Thanks for the posting. I have
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM=y
CONFIG_VIR
Get off your high horse. If I wouldn't of said 'that makes perfect fucking
sense, ' what I was trying to convey wouldn't have had the emotion it
needed. 'That makes perfect sense' seems to 'off-hand,' without any real
feeling to the statement. What it really says is 'that doesn't make any
sense, bu
walt wrote:
On 01/12/2011 04:17 PM, Dale wrote:
I just learned a long time ago to never say I am done with anything.
> We never know what will happen that makes us go back and fix something
> else.
I distinctly remember declaring "There! I'm done with my 1982 tax
return!"
BIG mistake :(
On Thursday 13 January 2011 01:02:30 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 02:35 on Thursday 13 January 2011,
> Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 23:22:12 Jacob Todd wrote:
> > > That makes perfect fucking sense.
> >
> > Would you please not use gra
Alan McKinnon writes:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 02:13 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Nuno J.
> Silva did opine thusly:
>
>> Well, I think it's still possible to use INT13 for disk access :-)
>
>
> You horrible person.
>
> I just went 13 years without hearing that thing's name mentioned not
On 01/12/2011 04:17 PM, Dale wrote:
I just learned a long time ago to never say I am done with anything.
> We never know what will happen that makes us go back and fix something
> else.
I distinctly remember declaring "There! I'm done with my 1982 tax return!"
BIG mistake :(
On 01/11/2011 11:04 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to build a windows 7 guest using virtualbox-ose-3.1.8. When
starting the virtual machine to install the OS, I get the warning:
"VT-x/AMD-V hardware acceleration has been enabled, but is not
operational. Your 64-bit guest will
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 23:57:32 Grant Edwards wrote:
> I checked both "us english" and "world english" versions.
Neither of which is acceptable in UK, the home of English. Not to me, at
any rate.
Colonials all...
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On Thursday 13 January 2011 00:00:53 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > If you'd asked that 10 or 20 years ago, the answer, as far as
> > booting is concerned, would have been "exactly the same as now".
>
> So we don't have new and faster processors? Larger hard drives?
> Faster DVD type med
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-01-13, Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
new things co
On Thursday 13 January 2011 00:17:42 Dale wrote:
> They always improving things on puters.
Well, changing them, anyway.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:57 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Grant
Edwards did opine thusly:
> Citations?
You want me to quote another assumed authority when I can just quote the one
that's already inside my head?
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:13 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Nuno J.
Silva did opine thusly:
> Dale writes:
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >>> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
> >>> be finished. There w
Matthew,
Default settings for both my.cnf and httpd.conf are defaults, however, I
would assume that a restart of a service would clear up the memory that was
used by child processes.
The only things that are really different in my.cnf is the base stuff like
bin-log and such for doing DB replicatio
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:32 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > grub cannot be complete as there are always new file systems and boot
> > methods that could be added.
>
> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
>
Nuno J. Silva wrote:
At least in UNIX-like systems, one can always have a separate /boot in
ext2, and use other filesystem everywhere else. It makes a grub update
less urgent.
Also, if they change - again - the way hard drives are accessed, just
because some "oh, 8GiB is so big, no disk will eve
Dale writes:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
>>> be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
>>> new things come out. I still wonder where co
On 2011-01-13, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
>>> be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
>>> new things come out. I still wo
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Kaddeh wrote:
> Jarry,
>
> Thanks for the monitoring advice, I am checking out monit right now.
>
> In terms of what is the root cause of the issue, I have narrowed it down to
> either write caching of a SQL cache issue.
>
> First, addressing the SQL issue and why
Dale writes:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:46:43 -0600, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
What is there to do with it? It's a bootloader that boots and loads,
what more do you want?
No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
new things come out. I still wonder where computers will be in say 10
or 20 ye
On 2011-01-12, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Grant Edwards did opine thusly:
>> On 2011-01-12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:33:02 +, Stroller wrote:
>> >>> No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
>> >>
>> >> Boot to BTFS filesystems?
>> >
>> > Finished
Dale writes:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> grub cannot be complete as there are always new file systems and boot methods
>> that could be added.
>
> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
> be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in
> as new t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:46:43 -0600, Dale wrote:
What is there to do with it? It's a bootloader that boots and loads,
what more do you want?
No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
My point was, if something changes and it no longer
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:32:32 -0600, Dale wrote:
> That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
> be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
> new things come out. I still wonder where computers will be in say 10
> or 20 years.
If you'd as
Alan McKinnon wrote:
grub cannot be complete as there are always new file systems and boot methods
that could be added.
That was my point earlier. With computers changing, nothing will ever
be finished. There will always be something that has to be added in as
new things come out. I
That makes perfect fucking sense.
On Jan 12, 2011 6:18 PM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 00:42 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Grant
> Edwards did opine thusly:
>
>> On 2011-01-12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:33:02 +, Stroller wrote:
>> >> > No lon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:42 on Thursday 13 January 2011, Grant
Edwards did opine thusly:
> On 2011-01-12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:33:02 +, Stroller wrote:
> >> > No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
> >>
> >> Boot to BTFS filesy
Jarry,
Thanks for the monitoring advice, I am checking out monit right now.
In terms of what is the root cause of the issue, I have narrowed it down to
either write caching of a SQL cache issue.
First, addressing the SQL issue and why I think that that could be one of
the causes. The entire sit
Jacques Montier writes:
> Le 12/01/2011 20:07, Nuno J. Silva a écrit :
>> Jacques Montier writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am installing Gentoo on a new pc and following the Gentoo manual.
>>> I create primary partition sda3 for boot with ext3 file system, then
>>> Extended partition for
>>> swa
On 2011-01-12, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:33:02 +, Stroller wrote:
>
>> > No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
>>
>> Boot to BTFS filesystems?
>
> Finished != complete
Maybe not on the right hand side of the pond, but here in the US
finished
Le 12/01/2011 20:07, Nuno J. Silva a écrit :
> Jacques Montier writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am installing Gentoo on a new pc and following the Gentoo manual.
>> I create primary partition sda3 for boot with ext3 file system, then
>> Extended partition for
>> swap sda5
>> / sda6 with reiserfs file
On 12/1/2011, at 6:14pm, Jacques Montier wrote:
> ...
> after chroot, i can install every package except grub in /boot.
> I get the message : "your boot partition, detected as being mounted as
> /boot, is read-only.
> Remounting it in read-write mode ..."
> Then the error message : "failed to crea
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:33:02 +, Stroller wrote:
> > No longer updated can mean broken, but it can also mean finished.
>
> Boot to BTFS filesystems?
Finished != complete
--
Neil Bothwick
Bug: (n.) any program feature not yet described to the marketing
department.
signature.asc
Descrip
On 12. 1. 2011 19:59, Kaddeh wrote:
P4 @ 3.0Ghz
2GB PC2 4200
2x 250GB drives in RAID1
The system configurations are default for the most part with the server
running MySQL and Apache.
The problem that I am running into at this point, however is that the
machine seems to run out of memory and wil
On 2011-01-12, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a shot/question into the dark:
>
> Suppose I would have two identical motherboards (desktop), both identical
> equipped with a multi-core CPU each (AMD).
>
> Two questions:
> 1: Is it possible to run one of the boards without a graphics
On 11/1/2011, at 10:08pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:51:33 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, I have to say that for the moment, the old grub is working fine
>> here. Just like ntp, that may change next week. I just wonder how
>> much longer it will take before they get it stabi
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I am now running Linux camille 2.6.36-gentoo-r5 kernel. My ivtv drivers
> don't work with this kernel. The newest ivtv drivers in portage only
> work on 2.6.25 kernels. What should I do?
The IVTV driver should be included in the kernel
Did you try downloading and building a newer version from the ivtv website?
If there's a version there that works with the new kernels, file a bug
report on f.g.o for a version bump, and either wait for that or use hand
built drivers that won't be tracked by portage. If your card doesn't have
drive
I am now running Linux camille 2.6.36-gentoo-r5 kernel. My ivtv drivers
don't work with this kernel. The newest ivtv drivers in portage only
work on 2.6.25 kernels. What should I do?
Jacques Montier writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am installing Gentoo on a new pc and following the Gentoo manual.
> I create primary partition sda3 for boot with ext3 file system, then
> Extended partition for
> swap sda5
> / sda6 with reiserfs file system
> /usr sda7 with reiserfs file system
> /home sd
So, I have run into an interesting problem while building out a web server
for a client which I haven't come across before and I was hoping that the
list would be a good way for me to find the answer.
A little beckground on the systems:
P4 @ 3.0Ghz
2GB PC2 4200
2x 250GB drives in RAID1
The system
Hi all,
I am installing Gentoo on a new pc and following the Gentoo manual.
I create primary partition sda3 for boot with ext3 file system, then
Extended partition for
swap sda5
/ sda6 with reiserfs file system
/usr sda7 with reiserfs file system
/home sda8 with reiserfs fiel system.
after chroot
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:24 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a shot/question into the dark:
>
> Suppose I would have two identical motherboards (desktop), both identical
> equipped with a multi-core CPU each (AMD).
>
> Two questions:
> 1: Is it possible to run one of the boards without a graphics
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I was still running linux-2.6.30-gentoo-r8. I didn't even HAVE an
> option for ATA SFF support. I'm going to build a v2.6.36-gentoo-r5
> kernel and pray that my ivtv stuff still works...
If you have any IDE devices you might want to re
Hi,
this is a shot/question into the dark:
Suppose I would have two identical motherboards (desktop), both identical
equipped with a multi-core CPU each (AMD).
Two questions:
1: Is it possible to run one of the boards without a graphics card?
2: Can I "combine" both (how?) to use the power of b
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Michael Sullivan
>> wrote:
>> > Why is it not being mapped correctly? Is the rule above not correct?
>> > I've tried to read tutorials about wr
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:08:58 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I was still running linux-2.6.30-gentoo-r8. I didn't even HAVE an
> option for ATA SFF support. I'm going to build a v2.6.36-gentoo-r5
> kernel and pray that my ivtv stuff still works...
ATA_SFF was definitely in 2.6.30. Press / in m
On 1/12/2011 12:13 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Mike Edenfield writes:
>
>> On 1/12/2011 11:31 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
>>> Michael Sullivan writes:
>>>
OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an
Mike Edenfield writes:
> On 1/12/2011 11:31 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
>> Michael Sullivan writes:
>>
>>> OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
>>> an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
>>
>> If you're using a recent kernel, it'
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:54 -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 1/12/2011 11:11 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
> > an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
> > DVD+R drive, which is mapped to /dev/
On 1/12/2011 11:31 AM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Michael Sullivan writes:
>
>> OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
>> an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
>
> If you're using a recent kernel, it's probably udev which refuses to
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 10:28 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Michael Sullivan
> wrote:
> > Why is it not being mapped correctly? Is the rule above not correct?
> > I've tried to read tutorials about writing udev rules, but the example
> > rules in the tutorials look
On 1/12/2011 11:11 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
> an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
> DVD+R drive, which is mapped to /dev/sr0. When I look
> at /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules I
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 16:31 +, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Michael Sullivan writes:
>
> > OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
> > an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
>
> If you're using a recent kernel, it's probably udev whi
Michael Sullivan writes:
> OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
> an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
If you're using a recent kernel, it's probably udev which refuses to
process devices under the old ATA driver.
(I don't kn
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Why is it not being mapped correctly? Is the rule above not correct?
> I've tried to read tutorials about writing udev rules, but the example
> rules in the tutorials look nothing like the above rules, and I didn't
> write those. I thin
OK, for several years I have not had a /dev/cdrom. My workstation has
an internal cd-rom drive, which gets mapped to /dev/hda, and an external
DVD+R drive, which is mapped to /dev/sr0. When I look
at /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules I see:
camille rules.d # cat 70-persistent-cd.rules
#
On 01/12/2011 06:46 AM, Mark Knecht stated:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Valmor de Almeida
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to build a windows 7 guest using virtualbox-ose-3.1.8. When
>> starting the virtual machine to install the OS, I get the warning:
>>
>> "VT-x/AMD-V hardware acc
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 16:17:09 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 05:39 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 09:27:00 kashani wrote:
> >> On 1/12/2011 12:04 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> >>> System uname:
> >>> linux-2.6.34-gentoo-r12-x86_64-intel-r-_core-tm-_i7_cp
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Jake Moe wrote:
> I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
> fine, I can mount the filesystem and read them. Data and Video DVDs
> seem to work fine as well. But when I try to listen to an audio CD, I
> get the attached errors in log.bz
On 01/12/2011 05:39 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011 09:27:00 kashani wrote:
>> On 1/12/2011 12:04 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>> System uname:
>>> linux-2.6.34-gentoo-r12-x86_64-intel-r-_core-tm-_i7_cpu_l_6...@_2.13ghz-w
>>> ith-gentoo-1.12.14 Timestamp of tree: Sat, 20 Nov
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Valmor de Almeida
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a windows 7 guest using virtualbox-ose-3.1.8. When
> starting the virtual machine to install the OS, I get the warning:
>
> "VT-x/AMD-V hardware acceleration has been enabled, but is not
> operational. Y
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> This VM, running in Virtualbox-4.0.0 on Win 7 didn't work. A more or
>> less identical Gentoo VM running on a Gentoo server (yes, Gentoo
>> within Gentoo) didn't switch to the VM's console but switched to the
>> server's console. Assumi
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 09:27:00 kashani wrote:
> On 1/12/2011 12:04 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> > System uname:
> > linux-2.6.34-gentoo-r12-x86_64-intel-r-_core-tm-_i7_cpu_l_6...@_2.13ghz-w
> > ith-gentoo-1.12.14 Timestamp of tree: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:45:01 +
>
> That chip looks
On Monday 10 January 2011 10:48:56 Jake Moe wrote:
> I can't seem to get audio CDs to work with my drive. Data CDs work
> fine, I can mount the filesystem and read them. Data and Video DVDs
> seem to work fine as well. But when I try to listen to an audio CD, I
> get the attached errors in log.b
On 1/12/2011 12:04 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
System uname:
linux-2.6.34-gentoo-r12-x86_64-intel-r-_core-tm-_i7_cpu_l_6...@_2.13ghz-with-gentoo-1.12.14
Timestamp of tree: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:45:01 +
That chip looks okay. http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43563
kashani
On 01/12/2011 02:48 AM, kashani wrote:
> On 1/11/2011 11:04 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to build a windows 7 guest using virtualbox-ose-3.1.8. When
>> starting the virtual machine to install the OS, I get the warning:
>>
>> "VT-x/AMD-V hardware acceleration has been ena
On 1/11/2011 11:04 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to build a windows 7 guest using virtualbox-ose-3.1.8. When
starting the virtual machine to install the OS, I get the warning:
"VT-x/AMD-V hardware acceleration has been enabled, but is not
operational. Your 64-bit guest will fa
73 matches
Mail list logo
