Apparently, though unproven, at 22:10 on Thursday 06 January 2011, KIM WHALEN
did opine thusly:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, walt wrote:
> > On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
> >> Sorry, I did
> >> # echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.0.0" >>
> >> /etc/portage/package.mask
> >> f
Apparently, though unproven, at 03:49 on Friday 07 January 2011, Stroller did
opine thusly:
> Hi there,
>
> Can anyone else reproduce this, please, or tell me what behaviour is
> expected?
>
> $ locale
> LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
> LC_CTYPE="en_GB.UTF-8"
> LC_NUMERIC="en_GB.UTF-8"
> LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8
Paul Colquhoun wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:31:52 Dale wrote:
This is ntp.conf but I omitted the parts that are commented out.
server 64.6.144.6
server 67.159.5.90
server 67.59.168.233
server 204.62.14.98
Have you tried switching servers?
I'm using
server 0.au.pool.ntp.org
s
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:31:52 Dale wrote:
> William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Dale, can you post (a sanitised) version of what 'ntpq -p' gives after
> > ntpd has been running for some time, and the sanitised result of
> > 'ntptrace. Also include your full (sanitised) ntp.conf
> > and /etc/conf.d/ntpd.
>
William Kenworthy wrote:
Dale, can you post (a sanitised) version of what 'ntpq -p' gives after
ntpd has been running for some time, and the sanitised result of
'ntptrace. Also include your full (sanitised) ntp.conf
and /etc/conf.d/ntpd.
This might help us see more detail of what is happening.
On Thursday 06 January 2011 23:51:38 KIM WHALEN wrote:
> I made the kernel with the nvidia driver as a module and the "emerge
> x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers" worked. However, running Xorg -configure
> still fails.
you don't even need that.
cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "ServerLayout"
Ide
Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
Can anyone else reproduce this, please, or tell me what behaviour is expected?
$ locale
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_GB.UTF
Hi there,
Can anyone else reproduce this, please, or tell me what behaviour is expected?
$ locale
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_COLLATE="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_GB.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_G
gmx.de> writes:
> I want to convert a couple of pdf-documents, which
> are of test and "ASCIIbased tables", to pure text
> (ASCII, vim-editable ;) ).
app-text/pdftk
http://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/
Is very cool for all things PDF on linux.
hth,
James
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 14:46 -0600, Dale wrote:
> kashani wrote:
> > On 1/5/2011 12:04 AM, Thanasis wrote:
> >> I think you should prefer openntpd over ntpd, because I think openntpd
> >> is developed by openbsd, which means more secure ...
> >>
> >
> > I tried openntp a couple years ago. It was
On 01/07/11 09:51, KIM WHALEN wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 06 January 2011 20:10:15 KIM WHALEN wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
> Sorry, I did
> # echo ">=x11-driver
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Thursday 06 January 2011 20:10:15 KIM WHALEN wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
Sorry, I did
# echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.0.0" >>
/etc/portage/package.mask
firs
On Thursday 06 January 2011 20:10:15 KIM WHALEN wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, walt wrote:
> > On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
> >> Sorry, I did
> >> # echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.0.0" >>
> >> /etc/portage/package.mask
> >> first
> >
> > Good, you're now trying to in
kashani wrote:
On 1/5/2011 12:04 AM, Thanasis wrote:
I think you should prefer openntpd over ntpd, because I think openntpd
is developed by openbsd, which means more secure ...
I tried openntp a couple years ago. It was a giant pain in the
ass. IIRC it was combination of crap defaults, p
Jacob Todd wrote:
The only thing I have changed with openntp is in /etc/ntpd.conf, I
added `listen on *`, maybe a few servers and in /etc/conf.d/ntpd or
whatever it's called, I added `-s` to OPTIONS. I've been using that on
a server for a year and my laptops for over two. I've had no problems
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:02 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
Sorry, I did
# echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.0.0" >>
/etc/portage/package.mask
first
Good, you're now trying to install the correct version.
then tried it again and got the following error.
On 01/06/2011 10:43 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
Sorry, I did
# echo ">=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-177.0.0" >> /etc/portage/package.mask
first
Good, you're now trying to install the correct version.
then tried it again and got the following error.
Your kernel was configured to include nvidiafb s
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Dale wrote:
I deleted the /etc/adjtime but it has not been recreated. What
creates this file? I deleted it a couple days ago and nothing has
brought it back yet.
/sbin/hwclock --systohc does.
What happens in the long run if yo
>>> But watch out -- after the eselect, you'll need to move your php.ini
>>> from e.g. /etc/php/apache2 to /etc/php/apache2-php5.3.
>>
>> Here I get confused. I believe a "development version" of php.ini was
>> installed to /etc/php/apache2-php5.3/php.ini. It included a
>> development value for e
on 01/06/2011 07:31 PM Dale wrote the following:
>
> Well, I tried openntp for a good while last night and it was worse
> than ntp. It was adjusting the clock by something like 20 seconds at
> a time.
That's probably because you didn't put -s in the start up options in
/etc/conf.d/ntpd:
# See n
The only thing I have changed with openntp is in /etc/ntpd.conf, I added
`listen on *`, maybe a few servers and in /etc/conf.d/ntpd or whatever it's
called, I added `-s` to OPTIONS. I've been using that on a server for a year
and my laptops for over two. I've had no problems with syncing.
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:31:30 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Well, I tried openntp for a good while last night and it was worse than
> ntp. It was adjusting the clock by something like 20 seconds at a
> time. Even ntp wasn't that bad.
ntpd won't shift the clock by too much at a time. If your clock is
fu
On 1/5/2011 12:04 AM, Thanasis wrote:
I think you should prefer openntpd over ntpd, because I think openntpd
is developed by openbsd, which means more secure ...
I tried openntp a couple years ago. It was a giant pain in the ass.
IIRC it was combination of crap defaults, poor docs, and plain
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Dale wrote:
> I deleted the /etc/adjtime but it has not been recreated. What
> creates this file? I deleted it a couple days ago and nothing has
> brought it back yet.
/sbin/hwclock --systohc does.
What happens in the long run if you don't run any synchronization
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:25 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/05/2011 06:41 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, walt wrote:
On 01/04/2011 08:10 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
I'm trying to do a new install on an amd64 box and there are a lot
o
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:25 PM, walt wrote:
On 01/05/2011 06:41 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:56 AM, walt wrote:
On 01/04/2011 08:10 AM, KIM WHALEN wrote:
I'm trying to do a new install on an amd64 box and there are a lot
of problems somewhere between X, Gnome, and the Graph
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Vaeth wrote:
> > Lately it seems that eix disregards the content of
> > /etc/portage/package.keywords.nowarn
>
> From the ChangeLog:
>
> *eix-0.22.1 [...]
> - use /etc/portage/package.nowarn instead of
> /etc/portage/package.*.nowarn; the latter is now obsolete.
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Dale wrote:
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Dale wrote:
Now on my old system, it would adjust the drift file and the
adjustments would get smaller and smaller. On the new rig, as
you can see it s
> Lately it seems that eix disregards the content of
> /etc/portage/package.keywords.nowarn
>From the ChangeLog:
*eix-0.22.1 [...]
- use /etc/portage/package.nowarn instead of
/etc/portage/package.*.nowarn; the latter is now obsolete.
If you want continue to use it, set OBSOLETE_NOWAR
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> different fonts maybe?
>
Turns out after some more research that it was that the locale was not
set.
Mike.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Dale wrote:
> Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Dale wrote:
> >> Now on my old system, it would adjust the drift file and the
> >> adjustments would get smaller and smaller. On the new rig, as
> >> you can see it stays about the same. I woul
31 matches
Mail list logo