On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 02:12 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Michael Sullivan writes:
>
> > 4: mich...@camille ~ $ nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA__
> > querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.1.255
> > 192.168.1.2 __SAMBA__<00>
> >
> > 4: carter ~ # nmblookup -B camille *
> > querying xorg.conf.new on 192.16
Michael Sullivan writes:
> 4: mich...@camille ~ $ nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA__
> querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.1.255
> 192.168.1.2 __SAMBA__<00>
>
> 4: carter ~ # nmblookup -B camille *
> querying xorg.conf.new on 192.168.1.3
> name_query failed to find name xorg.conf.new
>
> *I'm not sure
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 22:43 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> If it's been some time since this system was used, are you still using
> the 192.168.1.x subnet? If your ISP sent you a new router, you might
> now be on 192.168.0.x. IMO change this to:
> hosts allow = 192.168. 127.
>
I bought a brand n
On 14 Jun 2010, at 21:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
... When I try to connect to the samba share from my
linux install, I get this:
mich...@camille ~ $ smbclient //carter//home
Enter michael's password:
Domain=[MYGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.6]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAM
My personal workstation is a dual-boot setup with Gentoo and Windows XP.
A long time ago, I set up Samba on another computer on my network to
provide extra hard drive space to our Windows installations. They used
to work, but we haven't used them in some time. I tried to use it today
and it didn'
On 06/14/10 12:19, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>>
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
> >> Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
> >> But my /usr partition is up-to-
On 14 Jun, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
>> Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
>> But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
>> binary build-pkgs.
>> What's the fastest w
Dan Johansson writes:
> After a recent gcc upgrade (4.3.4 -> 4.4.3-r2) on an amd64, pdftk won't
> compile anymore. Although I like the pdtk I'm looking for a replacement as
> pdft is no more maintained (last release November 28, 2006).
> Any suggestions for a good command line tool to manage P
On Montag 14 Juni 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
> Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
> But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
> binary build-pkgs.
> What's the fastest way to restore the portage-relevant
> data on the
Hi,
due to a disk crash I've lost my root partition.
Unfortunately, the backup version is 4 weeks old.
But my /usr partition is up-to-date and I have
binary build-pkgs.
What's the fastest way to restore the portage-relevant
data on the root partition?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut J
On 2010-06-14 9:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality
>> up to date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
> How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality up to
> date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas?
How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5?
--
Neil Bothwick
To most people solutions mea
On 2010-06-13 6:37 PM, David W Noon wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:20:02 +0200, Tanstaafl wrote about Re:
> [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail?:
>
>> On 2010-06-12 5:17 PM, David W Noon wrote:
>>> I wanted the messages to be stored in a single, dedicated
>>> logical volume in my DASD far
On Monday 14 June 2010 10:11:19 Jose Juan Montiel wrote:
> Thanks, now i know this.
We all have to start somewhere - good luck!
--
Rgds
Peter.
Hi,
> but what you need is not to reply to
> anything but to start a new message. Changing titles does not start a
> new thread, nor should it. Ask yourself: what is the difference between a
> /new/ message and a /reply/ to another message?
>
> You should be able just to click on the list address
On Monday 14 June 2010 09:43:05 Jose Juan Montiel wrote:
> i'll use icedove button reply list, and changed title (i tought that
> this create a new message).
I don't know what icedove is, but what you need is not to reply to
anything but to start a new message. Changing titles does not start a
> Please don't hijack threads. Previous discussion & explanation:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg71515.html
>
Sorry i'll use icedove button reply list, and changed title (i tought
that this create a new message).
Sorry. I'll write a new post with resume of answers
Hi, this is a resume post from...
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg102327.html
--
I follow all step of
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86-quickinstall.xml but when i
finally go to install gnome... in the latests package (mailclient or
something similar) fail...
A
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:37:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> >Dovecot will store them where you tell it to. You could have easily
> >stored them all in a single directory like /var/virtual/mail/user, or
> >even used a hashed directory scheme (which might be desirable for very
> >large installations l
20 matches
Mail list logo
