looks interesting ...
I think many ISP's use DNS to manage/direct traffic internally so will
this bypass or break parts of their network for the google DNS user?
off the top of my head, the explanations I have seen give a reasonable
approach to security of your footprints as you travel the Intern
I just found out that google is offering its DNS servers to the public
for free. as usual.
I know that anyone can use any DNS server that's exposed to the internet,
also for free, so what's the big deal about google?
Well, they say that their DNS servers are more resistant to cache poisoning
and
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:46:18 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> One of the major deficiencies of Gentoo is
> >> that it doesn't provide such a file automatically.
> > emerge -p @system
> > emerge -p @world
>
> root:501 ~> emerge -p @system
> !!! '@system' is not a valid package atom.
> !
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 00:46:18 Philip Webb wrote:
091207 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:49:44 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
I know that from my home-made list of pkgs which I have installed,
where they are marked with 'W' & system pkgs with 'S'
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users,
is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
It shows this here:
[M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1)
Isn't that masked and k
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 00:41:57 Grant Edwards wrote:
> Quoting from the page on Python 2.7 (released today):
>
> Python 2.7 is scheduled to be the last major version in the
> 2.x series before it moves into 5 years of bugfix-only mode.
>
> So there's at least 5 years of life left in the
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 00:46:18 Philip Webb wrote:
> 091207 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:49:44 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> >> I know that from my home-made list of pkgs which I have installed,
> >> where they are marked with 'W' & system pkgs with 'S'.
> >> Yes, I do have to
091207 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:49:44 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>> I know that from my home-made list of pkgs which I have installed,
>> where they are marked with 'W' & system pkgs with 'S'.
>> Yes, I do have to keep it upto-date as I do emerges.
>> One of the major deficiencie
On 2009-12-07, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 07 December 2009 22:24:14 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> My most recent update displayed the following messages from
>> Python 2.6.4 and Python 2.4.6:
>>
>> "It is highly recommended to additionally install Python 3,"
>>
>> Why is it highly recommended?
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:10:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The only benefit, which is questionable, is that python-3 is where its
> at development-wise, and maybe perhaps the 2* series will become
> unmaintained (shades of KDE-3). But I suspect that day is still far off.
Also, as things are able t
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users,
> > is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
> It shows this here:
>
> [M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1)
>
> Isn't that masked and keyworded? I'm x86 he
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> I update my server quite frequently without any problem, but
> today after running "emerge -uDN world" I got these messages:
>
> -
> !!! existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9
> * - /lib64/libuuid.so
> *
On Monday 07 December 2009 22:24:14 Grant Edwards wrote:
> My most recent update displayed the following messages from
> Python 2.6.4 and Python 2.4.6:
>
> "It is highly recommended to additionally install Python 3,"
>
> Why is it highly recommended? I use a lot of modules that
> aren't suppor
On 12/07/2009 03:24 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
You *might* want to look into OSS4 if your card is supported by it :P
It will require a rebuild of many packages though ("oss -alsa" in
make.conf) and it requires using non-portage packages from an overlay
and rebuilding your
My most recent update displayed the following messages from
Python 2.6.4 and Python 2.4.6:
"It is highly recommended to additionally install Python 3,"
Why is it highly recommended? I use a lot of modules that
aren't support by Python 3, and AFAICT few of the system
applications will even work
On Monday 07 December 2009 20:10:31 Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> I update my server quite frequently without any problem, but
> today after running "emerge -uDN world" I got these messages:
>
> -
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9
>
> * - /lib64/libuui
Hi,
I update my server quite frequently without any problem, but
today after running "emerge -uDN world" I got these messages:
-
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9
* - /lib64/libuuid.so
* used by /bin/mount (sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1)
* use
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
is a hint at least.
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is
that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the defa
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
> And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
> is a hint at least.
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is
that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
--
Neil Bothwick
Ag
Dale a écrit :
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>>
>> If it were
>> buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-)
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>
> And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
> is a hint at least.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Thanks all for your answers. Anyway, is the
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
> So it seems to be related to xorg-server here.
>
> I will do some more tests to filter things out a bit closer.
> This will maybe allow me to file a meaningful bug.
For the records: 1.7.2 has been dropped because of that Video ABI stuff,
1.7.3 is stable for me sin
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> You *might* want to look into OSS4 if your card is supported by it :P
> It will require a rebuild of many packages though ("oss -alsa" in
> make.conf) and it requires using non-portage packages from an overlay
> and rebuilding your kernel with sound support completely d
Albert Hopkins wrote:
If it were
buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-)
-a
And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
is a hint at least.
Dale
:-) :-)
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:11 +0100, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Sorry but instead of python 2.7 (which does not exists), i was talking
> about
> python 3 support in portage. Is it safe to remove earlier version of
> python to
> only keep version 3 ?
No. When you installed python3 it pretty much tells
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:28 +0100, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I eard [sic] some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python
> 2.7, so i
> masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
> is is portage now compatible with this version of pyt
On Monday 07 December 2009 13:11:52 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Xavier Parizet a écrit :
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python
> > 2.7, so i masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would
> > like to know now is is portage now compati
Xavier Parizet wrote:
Xavier Parizet a écrit :
Hi list,
I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7, so i
masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:15:29 -0600, Dale wrote:
Good catch Volker. I didn't notice that part. He needs to become
very familiar with the -1 option but even that is not good in every
case. If it is a package that needs to be in world, then that option
shouldn't be used e
Xavier Parizet a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7,
> so i
> masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
> is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where
> can
> i foll
* Xavier Parizet (Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:28:07 +0100)
>
> I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7,
> so i
> masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
> is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:00:00 -0800, Drew wrote:
> Isn't the memory hole above 3GB present even in the 64bit systems?
> Something about the MMIO reservations for the PCI bus taking up the
> top gig of the first four Gigs?
That's the case with some hardware, like my Asus motherboard. It was
fixed by
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:49:44 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> I know that from my home-made list of pkgs which I have installed,
> where they are marked with 'W' & system pkgs with 'S'.
> Yes, I do have to keep it upto-date as I do emerges.
> One of the major deficiencies of Gentoo is
> that it doesn't
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:15:29 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> Good catch Volker. I didn't notice that part. He needs to become
> >> very familiar with the -1 option but even that is not good in every
> >> case. If it is a package that needs to be in world, then that option
> >> shouldn't be used either o
On Monday 07 December 2009 11:28:07 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7,
> so i masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to
> know now is is portage now compatible with this version of python ?
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:53:41 +0900, daid kahl wrote:
> On that note, I'd like to ask a question I was going to post or email
> about. Can I comment the world file. More interestingly, is there a
> way to pass portage a comment to stick in world above the package?
> This would be really damn usefu
yes i use / on LVM.
i just cannot understand why the busybox in the initramfs that
genkernel generates works fine, while mine reports error.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 07 December 2009 03:00:29 Xi Shen wrote:
>> yes, i installed busybox into the initramfs i
Hi list,
I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7, so i
masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where can
i follow the status of this compatibility ? I loo
37 matches
Mail list logo
