On Montag 20 Juli 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> >
> >> myth12 mythtv # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep EE
> >> Current Operating System: Linux myth12 2.6.29-gentoo-r5 #4 PREEMPT Fri
> >> J
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> myth12 mythtv # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep EE
>> Current Operating System: Linux myth12 2.6.29-gentoo-r5 #4 PREEMPT Fri
>> Jun 26 09:51:45 PDT 2009 i686
>> (WW) warning, (EE) e
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> myth12 mythtv # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep EE
> Current Operating System: Linux myth12 2.6.29-gentoo-r5 #4 PREEMPT Fri
> Jun 26 09:51:45 PDT 2009 i686
> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
> (II) Loading ext
I didn't. Am I better off to change the default to something else? (1?)
Or how do I turn it on with the kernel?
I'll go look for some docs.
Thanks!
- Mark
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Volker Armin
Hemmann wrote:
> On Montag 20 Juli 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_D
On Montag 20 Juli 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
> CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT=0
with that option you have to turn it on on the kernel command line. Something
you didn't.
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> That help?
>>
>> Dale
>>
>
> Well the files we have in common have the same permisions/ownership
>
> but you have a few more than me..
>
>
>
> I rebuilt 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r1' oneshot, but
> it did not help fix the problem
>
>
> I'm
Hi,
I'm back trying to see if I can get these old Asus Pundit-R
machines to do anything at all with the newer kernel and the ATI Open
Source drivers. I've got fluxbox emerged and I'm trying to start
xluxbox using the xstart .xinitrc method. (Hope that's right?)
Anyway, when I run startx I se
Philip Webb ca.inter.net> writes:
> NB I have 2 more files than you + their locks.
> This is OO 3.1.0 (compiled from source) + 'qt-3.3.8b-r1'.
Yes, I noticed the 2 extra files. I have the same versions
of OO and qt as you. It works for root, but not james.
It all worked fine until I tried
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> That help?
>
> Dale
Well the files we have in common have the same permisions/ownership
but you have a few more than me..
I rebuilt 'x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b-r1' oneshot, but
it did not help fix the problem
I'm stumped
James
walt gmail.com> writes:
> There is also another possibility: root and you are just different
> users, and the problem may lie in your ~/.oo3/ directory. To test
> this idea just rename ~/.oo3 to something else and let OO make a new
> one. If that test fails then you start looking at permissi
On 07/19/2009 04:16 PM, James wrote:
Roy Wright wright.org> writes:
Also are you building OO from source or running the binary version?
Well, it's definately a permission problem, because as root
I can run OO flawlessly..?
There is also another possibility: root and you are just d
090719 James wrote:
> Roy Wright wright.org> writes:
>> Also are you building OO from source or running the binary version?
> Well, it's definately a permission problem,
> because as root I can run OO flawlessly.
> Here are the parent dir permissions:
> ls -l /usr/qt/3/etc/
> total 0
> drwx
James wrote:
> Roy Wright wright.org> writes:
>
>
>
>
>> Also are you building OO from source or running the binary version?
>>
>
>
> Well, it's definately a permission problem, because as root
> I can run OO flawlessly..?
>
>
>
> Here are the parent dir permissions:
>
> ls -l /usr/qt/
Roy Wright wright.org> writes:
> Also are you building OO from source or running the binary version?
Well, it's definately a permission problem, because as root
I can run OO flawlessly..?
Here are the parent dir permissions:
ls -l /usr/qt/3/etc/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 160 Jul
Roy Wright wright.org> writes:
> I'm wondering about the lock (notice the old date). Maybe move it to
> somewhere safe and try OO again.
I move '.qt_plugins_3.3rc.lock' to
'.qt_plugins_3.3rc.lock.dec30-2008'
Again it fails with this message:
terminate called after throwing an instance o
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 07:46 -0700, Grant wrote:
> I'm trying to decide between an AMD Barcelona or an Intel Harpertown
> quad-core CPU for a web/database server. The Intel would have a 5%
> lower clock speed. I've read that Harpertown outperforms Barcelona
> (by 20%?), but that the quad-core impl
I'm trying to decide between an AMD Barcelona or an Intel Harpertown
quad-core CPU for a web/database server. The Intel would have a 5%
lower clock speed. I've read that Harpertown outperforms Barcelona
(by 20%?), but that the quad-core implementation isn't as good on the
Harpertown. It's surpri
17 matches
Mail list logo
