> > For you guys with older hardware/drivers, have you tried
> turning on CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS and recompiling the kernel
> to see if its helps? (Kernel hacking -> Enable
> unused/obsolete exported symbols).
> That is a good find. I can't say that it is the problem but
> it was not
> enabled on
Adam Carter wrote:
> For you guys with older hardware/drivers, have you tried turning on
> CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS and recompiling the kernel to see if its helps? (Kernel
> hacking -> Enable unused/obsolete exported symbols).
>
> I use it to support vmware server 1.x and ati flgrx drivers (with 2.6
For you guys with older hardware/drivers, have you tried turning on
CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS and recompiling the kernel to see if its helps? (Kernel
hacking -> Enable unused/obsolete exported symbols).
I use it to support vmware server 1.x and ati flgrx drivers (with 2.6.26 or
later kernels). IIRC
On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:49:54 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Yes, that's it. Strange, I was under the impression that bdeps was "yes"
> by default.
Only when using --depclean.
--
Neil Bothwick
To boldly go where I surely don't belong.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
My mistake, not a bug. I'm glad I asked here before wasting devs'
time with invalid reports. Thanks, guys! :)
--
Best regards,
Daniel
Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:36:56 +0200
> Peter Alfredsen wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300
>> Daniel Iliev wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file
>>> a report with B.G.O?
>>>
>>>
>>> % emerge -
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:36:56 +0200
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300
> Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file
> > a report with B.G.O?
> >
> >
> > % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
> [...]
> > %
Daniel Iliev wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file a
> report with B.G.O?
>
>
> % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
>
> % emerge --depclean -p
>
> [-snip-]
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
> * t
On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:30:47 -0400
Jason Weisberger wrote:
> From what I see, update newuse deep world is NOT pulling it back in.
> That's the bug.
>
Exactly.
--
Best regards,
Daniel
Jason Weisberger schrieb am 18.05.2009 00:30:
> From what I see, update newuse deep world is NOT pulling it back in. That's
> the bug.
Okay i should read more carefully. Tried the --with-bdeps option?
--
Daniel Pielmeier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300
Daniel Iliev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file a
> report with B.G.O?
>
>
> % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
[...]
> % emerge --update --newuse --deep world
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> >>> Auto-cl
>From what I see, update newuse deep world is NOT pulling it back in. That's
the bug.
On May 17, 2009 6:26 PM, "Daniel Pielmeier"
wrote:
Daniel Iliev schrieb am 18.05.2009 00:16:
> Hi, > > > Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I
file a > report with B
What is the p
Daniel Iliev schrieb am 18.05.2009 00:16:
> Hi,
>
>
> Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file a
> report with B.G.O?
>
>
> % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
>
> % emerge --depclean -p
>
> [-snip-]
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> * Dependencies could not be comp
Hi,
Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file a
report with B.G.O?
% emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
% emerge --depclean -p
[-snip-]
Calculating dependencies... done!
* Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
* the following required packages not being ins
On Sonntag 17 Mai 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:33:22 pk wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the
> > > top a user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a
> > > USB device that the app can u
Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> Dale,
>As far as I can tell I'm not having any problems. This machine was
> using a 2.6.28 kernel up until yesterday when I updated to 2.6.29-r4.
> The point I'm trying to make is that this old driver and all the
> kernels I have used up to now have all worked.
>
>I n
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>>>
Dale ha scritto:
> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> friend
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>>
>>> Dale ha scritto:
>>>
I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and
bn wrote:
> Dale ha scritto:
>
>
>> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
>> compile with anything newer that I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:18:14 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>
>
>> 'make oldconfig' is the usual recommendation, but there's no help:
>> it's just a list of "Do you want to ... ?" which you can't save easily.
>>
>
> Of course there;s help. Most options give a choice of y/n
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>> Dale ha scritto:
>> > I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>> > friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>> > upgraded my kernel to
Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
>> Dale ha scritto:
>>> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
>>> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
>>> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. S
On Sunday 17 May 2009 19:10:05 bn wrote:
> Dale ha scritto:
> > I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> > friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
> > upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
> > compil
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:18:14 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> 'make oldconfig' is the usual recommendation, but there's no help:
> it's just a list of "Do you want to ... ?" which you can't save easily.
Of course there;s help. Most options give a choice of y/n/m/?. Guess what
happens when you press?
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:13:27 +0200, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> As you can see, there are post_ and pre_ phases for all phase functions
> which can be used to do fancy stuff like this.
Neat!
> I prefer /etc/portage/bashrc for this, since these hacks are usually
> only needed for a short time, so h
Dale ha scritto:
> I hope someone wins the debate soon and gets this to work and be "user
> friendly". I'm about to make a fresh backup and try this again. I have
> upgraded my kernel to a really new version, 2.6.25. Sorry, nvidia won't
> compile with anything newer that I have tried.
Uh? las
090517 bn wrote:
> What are the caveats and pitfalls I should be aware of
> when upgrading to latest kernel? I resume this thread
> because I read of things like "/dev/sr0 has disappeared"
>> & "You need to enable this to make CONFIG_PATA_JMICRON visible.
>> ... THAT's what happened to it !! T
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 16:46 +0100, bn wrote:
> So, what kind of traps like that should I expect?
I expect things like that to have potentially changed with every point
release of the 2.6 kernel, since the numbering scheme is practically
useless now. Every 2.6.XX release has the potential for majo
bn ha scritto:
> 2) What are the caveats and pitfalls I should be aware of when upgrading
> to latest kernel? I confess that reading CHANGELOGs didn't help me too
> much, quite confusing.
I resume this thread because I read ofthings like that ("/dev/sr0 has
disappeared" thread):
"> You need to ena
On Sunday 17 May 2009 14:15:31 pk wrote:
> > But you have that in the current setup. Hal (for better or worse) is the
> > daemon. dbus is simply a message transport and can be omitted from the
> > conceptual diagram
>
> Why is dbus needed? Why can't the user space apps talk to the user space
> daem
>> >>> There are still a lot of DVD-Video media that don't use CSS.
>> >>
>> >> I have certainly cloned region-protected DVDs on a number of
>> >> occasions
>> >> using `dd`. These disks have given no read errors, and the subsequent
>> >> encrypted .iso image has produced perfectly fine rips.
>> >
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> - only Linux has udev. Other OSes may not need, want or be willing to touch
> udev with a bargepole.
Yes, udev is linux only. Replace udev with whatever is available on
other platforms in that diagram. I just used linux as an example...
Sorry for not making it clear.
> Bu
Mick schrieb:
Last time this happened to me (more than once), it was because I had selected
something in the kernel that I shouldn't have. I had to retrace my steps,
removed the offending module and then it compiled and installed fine.
I think you are right. Yesterday I had some time to look
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Mick wrote:
> Thanks Graham,
>
> On Saturday 16 May 2009, Graham Murray wrote:
> > Here are some samples.
> >
> > /etc/racoon/racoon.conf
> >
> > /etc/racoon/psk.txt
> >
> > /etc/ipsec.conf
>
> Do I need a /etc/setkey.conf file? How do I create it?
>
> When I run '/etc/init.
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:42:20 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
I think you can redefine ebuild functions
in /etc/portage/env/cat/pkg, so you could out a custom src_unpack()
in there. It should work if the ebuild has no src_unoack, so you
could do something like
src_unpack() {
On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:42:20 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I think you can redefine ebuild functions
> in /etc/portage/env/cat/pkg, so you could out a custom src_unpack()
> in there. It should work if the ebuild has no src_unoack, so you
> could do something like
>
> src_unpack() {
> unpack
On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:33:22 pk wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > As I see it, at the bottom of the stack you have a kernel and at the top
> > a user space app (the X server will do for an example). Plug in a USB
> > device that the app can use, and the kernel needs to make a node in /dev
> > for
On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:44:19 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Does anyone think that a mechanism of applying patches to a package
> without the need to modify the ebuild of that package would be a useful
> feature? There are cases of useful patches that are not accepted by
> the maintainers of
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> What if we could just specify patches to be applied in, say,
> /etc/portage/packages.patch with something like:
>
> media-video/smplayer j-random-hack.patch
>
> and portage would apply that patch automatically? That way, the
> hassle of updating the ebuild of a pack
On Sun, 17 May 2009 10:20:33 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> What if we could just specify patches to be applied in, say,
> >> /etc/portage/packages.patch with something like:
> >>
> >> media-video/smplayer j-random-hack.patch
...
> >> Can someone think of a way to set up something like thi
Am Sonntag, 17. Mai 2009 09:18:52 schrieb Philip Webb:
> > However, I can't even find it in menuconfig.
> >
> >> # CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is not set
> >
> > As written before: No SG, no write (to CD).
>
> No, I didn't have it in 2.6.25 & have just blanked a CD without it.
> The kernel help recommends 'N
Saphirus Sage wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Does anyone think that a mechanism of applying patches to a package
without the need to modify the ebuild of that package would be a
useful feature? There are cases of useful patches that are not
accepted by the maintainers of the ebuild (because th
090516 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 11:55:18 schrieb Philip Webb:
>> I have got 2.6.25 to work again after enabling 'evdev'
> evdev is completely unrelated to CD writing.
Yes, I know that: it was necessary in order to resurrect 2.6.25
after the big change in Xorg recently: I me
43 matches
Mail list logo
