On Tuesday 28 April 2009 01:20:56 Michael Higgins wrote:
> I _remember_ doing this just a few days ago, so I'm not doing it again...
> but why is it still throwing a warning? Is this a limitation of portage or
> the ebuild?
>
> --
> WARN: postinst
> /usr/lib/cups exists - You need to re
alex stone gmail.com> writes:
> So with that in mind, i have an interest in turning a very old box i
> have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router.
Ah, I do this all the time.
Use knoppix to boot your target mmx system into a viable linux.
Follow the handbook and get the system so you can
Thank you gentlemen. That gives me something to chase.
The help is appreciated.
Alex.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
>> have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router.
>> I tried a live cd, with the intent of building up a 32bit chroot in my
>> big box, and syncing it into
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:28:26 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Nothing as clever as that. I simply
>
> echo "cat/pkg" >>/etc/portage/sets/temp
>
> and have @temp in /var/lib/portage/world_sets
>
> Each week I look at the set and decide what should be removed or
> transferred to world.
That brought
> have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router.
> I tried a live cd, with the intent of building up a 32bit chroot in my
> big box, and syncing it into the old one. (All 64bit native in the
> studio boxes)
>
> when i inserted the live cd to begin the process, i got an error
> message at boot whic
> Do i need to install an older version of Gentoo in order for this to work?
No, never. You can use the last portage.
> Do i need to flag the boot in some way with options in order to get
> this to install?
I can be wrong, but I believe the livecd is i686, so will not run in
your box (pentium-mm
Hello all, my first post here.
Since installing Gentoo on my working audio box, i've had a good run,
with no problems. (I'm a full time classical composer)
The audio packages are stable and i get to work all day every day
without having to spend time tweaking anything in the OS. (At last)
So with
I _remember_ doing this just a few days ago, so I'm not doing it again... but
why is it still throwing a warning? Is this a limitation of portage or the
ebuild?
--
WARN: postinst
/usr/lib/cups exists - You need to remerge every ebuild that
installed into /usr/lib/cups and /etc/cups
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world
> >> and displays all packages it finds that are dependencies of
> >> something else in world, but I haven't fou
On Monday 27 April 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > This has puzzled me too. Is there a way of passing the equivalent of
> > tar's --exclude at star, rather than a file containing a
> > list of files to be excluded? I have been reading the -F,-FF ... but
> > have failed to underst
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:29:01 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> > Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That
> > way the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output
> > until I decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft
> > from various experim
Mick wrote:
> This has puzzled me too. Is there a way of passing the equivalent of
> tar's --exclude at star, rather than a file containing a list
> of files to be excluded? I have been reading the -F,-FF ... but have failed
> to understand it so far :(
Tar has no --exclude option.
You m
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag 23 April 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > as I wrote above, you got me thinking. If I can extract a multivolume
> > > archive created with star with gnutar I am sold and will try star. I
> > >
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:56:07 Daniel Troeder wrote:
> >
> > I would recommend running nmap in crontab if you want to scan your
> > network (look up ndiff on nmap's website).
> >
>
> Oh cool - I didn't know about "ndiff". Fetching nmap from SVN now... :)
>
> What does "segway" mean? I just foun
Marco wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Eric Martin wrote:
>
>> Marco wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I set up my first firewall on my notebook (not running any services
>>> reachable from outside) using iptables. Since I am new to the topic,
>>> could you please verify if the output
2009/4/27 Alex Bennee :
> I updated compiz today which required me to unmask:
>
> dev-libs/iniparser ~amd64
>
> And it promptly broke with:
>
> 18:44 a...@danny/x86_64 [~] >~/bin/start-compiz.sh
> compiz: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0: undefined
> symbol: in
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:28 -0500, Chris Frederick wrote:
> Now I'm also keeping in mind that you are on a laptop with no remote
> services. If you start allowing services, then that will change things.
> If clients are going to be connection to you for certain services, you
> should be more acco
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for special types of applications that allow
> for data entry, via voice commands or using the touch screen
> on a touch screen enabled laptop.
Don't know how accurate it is, but I found this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org
Anthony Metcalf anferny.me.uk> writes:
> I use http://freedns.afraid.org/ . Doesn't meet your not-free
> stipulation, but I think just about encompasses everything else
Thanks Everyone for the suggestions and information.
I've got to build up several machines and get the DNS
registered.
Si
James wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for special types of applications that allow
for data entry, via voice commands or using the touch screen
on a touch screen enabled laptop.
KDE4 is my preferred desktop, but any application that
will run on kde4 and gentoo is of interest. Is there
anything l
Grant wrote:
X-forwarding used to work for me but I haven't used it in a while and now I get:
Warning: untrusted X11 forwarding setup failed: xauth key data not generated
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
Xlib: connection to "localhost:10.0" refused by se
I updated compiz today which required me to unmask:
dev-libs/iniparser ~amd64
And it promptly broke with:
18:44 a...@danny/x86_64 [~] >~/bin/start-compiz.sh
compiz: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0: undefined
symbol: iniparser_new
However revdep-rebuild see
Hi group,
Having upgraded from the 2.6.23 kernel to the 2.6.28 and enabling the rt2x00
driver I get the following message at boot
...
* UDEV: Your system has a problem assigning persistent
* names to these network interfaces: wlan0-rename
* Checking persistent rules:
* Found no duplicate n
Ok,
1. Motherboard Raid is often "Fake Raid"
2. In Gentoo the Software Raid fucntions for Linux are probably faster than
your motherboard's
3. Having had and seen issues with mother board raid I'd suggest using the
mdtools. Since there is a FAR LARGER support base; that way if somthing goes
awry y
On Monday 27 April 2009 14:18:39 Yahya Mohammad wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I
> bought supports the so-called "Fake" RAID, which offloads most of the
> processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this
> as opposed to
> It has survived several crashes/power outages. For my RAID5 (four
> 500gb drives) it took about 90 minutes for the raid to verify after
> such incidents. I know there are benefits to hardware RAID but for low
> cost/low importance (it's my home PC) the software RAID is good enough
> for me.
Soft
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Simon wrote:
> I would recommend software raid. Because it's made by some great
> folks in the linux community and it is a project in development (so
> you can get lots of support and updates, though it is very stable and
> is used in many prod systems).
I'm usin
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:39:55 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That way
> the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output until I
> decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft from various
> experiments, alt
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, James wrote:
> Paul Hartman gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Paul Hartman
>> gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM, James tampabay.rr.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I'm looking for suggestions to use for D
I would recommend software raid. Because it's made by some great
folks in the linux community and it is a project in development (so
you can get lots of support and updates, though it is very stable and
is used in many prod systems).
Also the tool 'mdadm' combined with the output of /proc/mdstat
On Montag 27 April 2009, Andrei Susnea wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote:
> >> I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I
> >> bought supports the so-called "Fake" RAID, which offloads most of the
> >> processing to t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote:
I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I
bought supports the so-called "Fake" RAID, which offloads most of the
processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this
as o
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote:
> I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I
> bought supports the so-called "Fake" RAID, which offloads most of the
> processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this
> as opposed to pure sof
Hi list,
I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I
bought supports the so-called "Fake" RAID, which offloads most of the
processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this
as opposed to pure software RAID?
Hi, thanks!
> It seems a bit strange that checkroot gave no output, just failure -
> as if it's execution didn't even started, and, since it's one of the
> first initscripts to start, prehaps there's a problem with bash
> interpreter or access to init.d path.
>
> Since you've mounted filesystem an
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:59:42 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> eix dev-lang/python
>
> I see that it's highlighting version ~2.5.4-r2, which is what I have
> installed. If the 2.5.4-r2 version is "masked by keyword", why's it
> installed on my system? :)
It's not keyword-masked according to eix
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:12:39 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> However, revdep-rebuild still insists ati-drivers-8.552 is needed. The
> following message seems to be at the heart of the problem:
>
> broken /usr/lib64/libAMDXvBA.so.1.0 (requires libstdc++.so.5)
Are these the binary or open source d
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Simon wrote:
> hi there,
> i'm looking for suggestions and guidance. I have a vps host with
> gentoo on it, i dont think the vps is stable enough to ensure a good
> quality of service, but it could just need an upgrade, no big deal. I
> need a phone and
38 matches
Mail list logo