On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 04:42 +, Stroller wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2009, at 22:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 22:15 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:31 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is it there, or isn't it? I don't know if it matters, bu
On 18 Feb 2009, at 22:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 22:15 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:31 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
Is it there, or isn't it? I don't know if it matters, but when I
was
trying to fix the X problem, I built and booted with a
>> Here is a method for sharing a scanner over a network with
>> sane-backends and inetd:
>>
>> http://www.linux.com/articles/57798
>>
>> My prospective printer/scanner (HP c4599) is not listed in the SANE
>> compatible devices:
>>
>> http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-HEWLETT-PACKARD
>>
>
> It looks like the dependencies are wrong,have you filed a bug?
Not yet, do you mean in bugzilla?
--
wcw
Beau Henderson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Beau Henderson
> mailto:b...@thehenderson.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Alan McKinnon
> mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:38:39 Beau Henderson wrote:
>
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:55:29 +0900, daid kahl wrote:
> > Use a 2.6.28 kernel and enable ATH5K for wireless and ATL2 for wired.
> This may not be as good a suggestion as the former, so I don't post it
> in contradiction, but just as extra information. My method works with
> kernels at least as ol
2009/2/19 Neil Bothwick
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:06:13 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
>
> > I would love to hear from someone who managed a gentoo install on a 4G
> > SSHD with the onboard Atheros wifi chipset;also the ethernet would be
> > nice, it uses the L1e Gigabit chip, another Atheros pr
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Beau Henderson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:38:39 Beau Henderson wrote:
>> > I've tried manually altering the governor to performance but its the
>> same
>> > story.
>> >
>> > The system do
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:38:39 Beau Henderson wrote:
> > I've tried manually altering the governor to performance but its the same
> > story.
> >
> > The system doesn't appear sluggish, I'm really more concerned that
> > something is c
On Thursday 19 February 2009 01:38:39 Beau Henderson wrote:
> I've tried manually altering the governor to performance but its the same
> story.
>
> The system doesn't appear sluggish, I'm really more concerned that
> something is causing the load and this might lead to shorter battery life
> and a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Beau Henderson
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, James wrote:
> >>
> >> podgeweb.com> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >> > > I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is
> causin
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Beau Henderson wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my new
> Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in use. Right after
> boot up it settles at 1.00 when I do nothing. I'm not seeing anything ou
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Beau Henderson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, James wrote:
>>
>> podgeweb.com> writes:
>>
>>
>> > > I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing
>> > > my
>> > > new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, James wrote:
> podgeweb.com> writes:
>
>
> > > I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing
> my
> > > new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in use.
> Right
> > > after boot up it settles at 1.00 when I do nothing.
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 22:15 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:31 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> > Is it there, or isn't it? I don't know if it matters, but when I was
> > trying to fix the X problem, I built and booted with a new kernel:
>
> Did you try going back to th
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:06:13 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
> I would love to hear from someone who managed a gentoo install on a 4G
> SSHD with the onboard Atheros wifi chipset;also the ethernet would be
> nice, it uses the L1e Gigabit chip, another Atheros product.
Use a 2.6.28 kernel and ena
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:31 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Is it there, or isn't it? I don't know if it matters, but when I was
> trying to fix the X problem, I built and booted with a new kernel:
Did you try going back to the old kernel?
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 36: Alone to
Hi group,.too is considerably tougher. Xandros must die! But it has support for
the wifi, so the linux drivers must be out there. I don't want to start
dragging around more unnecessary stuff to get on line at my favo(u)rite cafe.
I would love to hear from someone who managed a gentoo install
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:34 -0500, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:30 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > I've had a lot of problems with X today. I finally got X back up, but
> > when I went to check MythTV, it didn't work. I started tracking down
> > the problem. I went into my
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:30 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I've had a lot of problems with X today. I finally got X back up, but
> when I went to check MythTV, it didn't work. I started tracking down
> the problem. I went into mythtv-setup and it said that it couldn't find
> any video inputs,
I've had a lot of problems with X today. I finally got X back up, but
when I went to check MythTV, it didn't work. I started tracking down
the problem. I went into mythtv-setup and it said that it couldn't find
any video inputs, so I examined /dev/v4l/video0. What I found was
really confusing:
hi,
i'm having here a gentoo ~x86 server running on 2.6.29-rc4. It has a nfs
server for booting diskless clients.
In dmesg I see random crashes of nfsd, which cause the clients to hang
until i reboot the server. Restarting /etc/init.d/nfs hangs at "Starting
NFS daemon...".
using nfs-utils-1.1.4-r
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:46:30 -0200, Alejandro wrote:
> Are you installing wicd from portage?
Yes, and it works fine. But that could be because that unspecified
dependencies were pulled in by something else.
--
Neil Bothwick
"I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away"
sig
2009/2/18 Neil Bothwick
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:24:15 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
>
> > > Do you have pygobject installed?
> >
> > I have updated pygobject to 2.14.2, then updated dbus-python to
> > 0.82.4, now the problem is fixed :)
>
> It looks like the dependencies are wrong,have you filed a b
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:24:15 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
> > Do you have pygobject installed?
>
> I have updated pygobject to 2.14.2, then updated dbus-python to
> 0.82.4, now the problem is fixed :)
It looks like the dependencies are wrong,have you filed a bug?
--
Neil Bothwick
Yes, I am an
podgeweb.com> writes:
> > I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my
> > new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in use. Right
> > after boot up it settles at 1.00 when I do nothing. I'm not seeing anything
> > out of ordinary in dmesg ( asside
daid kahl пишет:
> Also, you should avoid using oldconfig except for really minor
kernel
> upgrades. I know this is mentioned in documentation elsewhere, but
> just a useful reminder.
>
> ~daid
This has been discussed on this list before. Running make oldconfig
w
Hi, thanks for your tips!
> Do you have pygobject installed?
I have updated pygobject to 2.14.2, then updated dbus-python to
0.82.4, now the problem is fixed :)
--
wcw
2009/2/18 Matt Harrison
> Shawn Haggett wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:24:45 Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Beau Henderson
>>>
>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> G'day,
I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my
new
Shawn Haggett wrote:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:24:45 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Beau Henderson
wrote:
G'day,
I was wondering if anyone might have any idea's as to what is causing my
new Toshiba A300 Satelite to idle at a load of 1.00 when not in us
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:59:38 +0900, daid kahl wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the kernels used for LiveCDs are absolutely huge because
> they just assume you have basically every piece of hardware available,
> and thus take much longer to boot (comparing a LiveCD on my machine to
> my kernel, maybe 4 to
>
> I'm inclined to sumbit to the expertise of others when choosing kernel
> compilation options, and so I generally boot a recent liveCD and take a copy
> of the kernel .config from there (`zcat /proc/config.gz`)
>
> System Rescue CD uses a kernel of about the same vintage as the one you're
> tryi
> > Also, you should avoid using oldconfig except for really minor kernel
> > upgrades. I know this is mentioned in documentation elsewhere, but
> > just a useful reminder.
> >
> > ~daid
>
> This has been discussed on this list before. Running make oldconfig
> works fine. I, and a lot of others,
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:11 +0100
Arnau Bria wrote:
Hi,
> * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr
> * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild
> * Generated new 4_pkgs.rr
> * Assigning packages to ebuilds
> * Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr
> * Evaluating package order
> * Generated new 5_order
34 matches
Mail list logo
