-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> Stroller wrote:
>> On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
...
I think I tried this &/or genkernel & when I looked at /boot I found
they'd littered the place with clutter.
I hope you won't be offended, but the amount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reQuiem23 wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services
> in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
> pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted,
On 2 Feb 2009, at 04:32, Grant wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
"netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
Is that correct?
This thread has gotten confusing. If you mean the Acer Aspire One
netbook (of which the A110 is a sub-mod
Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 05:53:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
> Why would one need an initramfs?
That question has already been answered in this thread.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
El Lun, 2 de Febrero de 2009, 7:12, Grant escribió:
>> But that's the lesser of your problems. If you really meant
>> to install a 64 bits Gentoo, and your make.conf has that CHOST line, that
>> means that you chose the wrong stage3 file, and maybe also the wrong
>> livecd. You need a 64 bits livec
Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 06:14:17 schrieb Stroller:
> Hence I'd be worrying about
> incompatibilities when chrooting in, if I used a non-Gentoo one.
When you're chrooted, you _are_ in a Gentoo system. It doesn't matter what
system you used to unpack that stage tarball before.
I use GRML for
I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
"netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
Is that correct?
>>>
>>> If it's an Intel-compatible (x86) and Gentoo is 32-bit, then yes,
>>> that's correct.
>>
>> OK, does
Grant wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
"netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
Is that correct?
If it's an Intel-compatible (x86) and Gentoo is 32-bit, then yes, that's
correct.
OK, does i686 indicate 64-bit?
No. 64-bit is "x8
El Lun, 2 de Febrero de 2009, 6:54, Grant escribió:
>>> I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
>>> "netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
>>>
>>>
>>> CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
>>>
>>>
>>> Is that correct?
>>>
>>
>> If it's an Intel-compatible (x86) and Gentoo is 32-bit,
>> I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
>> "netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
>>
>> CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
> If it's an Intel-compatible (x86) and Gentoo is 32-bit, then yes, that's
> correct.
OK, does i686 indicate 64-bit?
- Grant
On 2 Feb 2009, at 04:50, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Stroller wrote:
For more funroll-loopiness I contemplate using ext4 for the new
system I'm about to install.
Anyone know of any LiveCDs that would support this?
Yep, SystemRescueCD supports it:
http://www.sysresccd.org
It's even Gentoo-ba
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Montag 02 Februar 2009, Miernik wrote:
>
>> After running 'emerge -uD world' I have many things messed-up, besides
>> the unability of firefox to do DNS resolve for most (but not all) URLs.
>> ssh also can't DNS resolve some hosts (but ping can on the same hosts)
On Montag 02 Februar 2009, Miernik wrote:
> After running 'emerge -uD world' I have many things messed-up, besides
> the unability of firefox to do DNS resolve for most (but not all) URLs.
> ssh also can't DNS resolve some hosts (but ping can on the same hosts).
>
> All my manpages look like this:
After running 'emerge -uD world' I have many things messed-up, besides
the unability of firefox to do DNS resolve for most (but not all) URLs.
ssh also can't DNS resolve some hosts (but ping can on the same hosts).
All my manpages look like this:
ESC[1mNAMEESC[0m
ls - list directory conten
Stroller wrote:
>
> On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I think I tried this &/or genkernel & when I looked at /boot I found
>>> they'd littered the place with clutter.
>>>
>>> I hope you won't be offended, but the amount of junk files this added
>>> made me want to barf.
>>>
>>> I hav
Stroller wrote:
> For more funroll-loopiness I contemplate using ext4 for the new system
> I'm about to install.
>
> Anyone know of any LiveCDs that would support this?
>
> I _think_ it should be just a case of untarring the stage 3, chrooting
> in, updating everything to latest & reboot. As long a
Stroller wrote:
For more funroll-loopiness I contemplate using ext4 for the new system
I'm about to install.
Anyone know of any LiveCDs that would support this?
Yep, SystemRescueCD supports it:
http://www.sysresccd.org
It's even Gentoo-based, what a deal! ;)
I _think_ it should be just
On 2009-02-01, Geralt wrote:
> Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel?
Not me. I do use the debian install utilities.
> Ib'm using it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much
> easier :-)
Why would one need an initramfs?
--
Grant
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Dale wrote:
>
>>> Can you recommend a non-biased news source online?
>>>
>>> - Grant
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/ Fair and Balanced.
>>
>
> *rofl*
>
> Joke of the day ;-o
>
>
> cu
>
Nope, not a joke at all. Thinking CNN is fair and ba
Grant wrote:
I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
"netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
Is that correct?
If it's an Intel-compatible (x86) and Gentoo is 32-bit, then yes, that's
correct.
On 2 Feb 2009, at 04:33, Stroller wrote:
... As long as I use 2.6.28 when I install I don't think there
should be anything that is incompatible with ext4??
I should have added: I plan to use ext3 for my boot partition.
Cheers,
Stroller.
For more funroll-loopiness I contemplate using ext4 for the new system
I'm about to install.
Anyone know of any LiveCDs that would support this?
I _think_ it should be just a case of untarring the stage 3, chrooting
in, updating everything to latest & reboot. As long as I use 2.6.28
when I
I'm installing Gentoo on an Acer Aspire 110. It's one of the
"netbook" laptops. /etc/make.conf says:
CHOST="i486-pc-linux-gnu"
Is that correct?
- Grant
On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
...
I think I tried this &/or genkernel & when I looked at /boot I found
they'd littered the place with clutter.
I hope you won't be offended, but the amount of junk files this added
made me want to barf.
I have avoided any such "complications" since, consi
* Dale wrote:
> >
> > Can you recommend a non-biased news source online?
> >
> > - Grant
> >
> >
> >
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/ Fair and Balanced.
*rofl*
Joke of the day ;-o
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT serv
Stroller wrote:
>
> On 2 Feb 2009, at 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>> Basically I build the kernel using make && make modules_install and
>>> then copy the kernel by hand using
>>>
>>> cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gen
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:23:56 +
Stroller wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2009, at 01:17, Tom wrote:
> >> Basically I build the kernel using make && make modules_install and
> >> then copy the kernel by hand
> >
> > Good god. So I'm not alone in being a dumbass :)
>
> What they said.
I'm another one.
I gue
On 2 Feb 2009, at 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Basically I build the kernel using make && make modules_install and
then copy the kernel by hand using
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gentoo-r8
or whatever the kernel is. I
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Now the build succeeds.
Nevertheless, starting sonic-visualisers complains:
sonic-visualiser: error while loading shared libraries: libvamp-hostsdk.so.2:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I cannot find libvamp-hostsdk.
Neither emergeing lib
>Basically I build the kernel using make && make modules_install and
>then copy the kernel by hand
Good god. So I'm not alone in being a dumbass :)
And I was getting really worried that I had made a fool of myself by
posting earlier and admitting my 'stupidity' ;)
Coming from debian, with all tha
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Basically I build the kernel using make && make modules_install and
> then copy the kernel by hand using
>
> cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gentoo-r8
>
> or whatever the kernel is. I add that to grub.conf and I'm done. wor
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH wrote:
>>>
>>>
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Does anyone know where I can get a copy of the 2006.0 minimal LiveCD
>> iso? According to this:
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
>>
>> "If you want to use the minimal CD on a smaller key or boot a > system, you need to follow the procedure described in this document
>> with a 2006
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Dale wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH wrote:
>>
>>> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
>>>
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImag
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:23:11 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Note that you can put slotted packages in the world file. For example
> if all you have in there is "kde-base/kdelibs" and you remove it,
> depclean will remove both KDE3 and well as KDE4 libs. Simply put
> "kde-base/kdelibs:3.5"
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I do not seem to be able to run star with the correct options despite some
> experimenting ... and was hoping you could correct my errors.
Try the command lines from the example section in the man page ;-)
> The fs is shown to be 1.1G large:
>
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH wrote:
>
>> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
>>
>>> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzIma
>> I am running amd64 using 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 and in arch there still is x86
>> an x86_64. Am I doing anything wrong or did I just missanderstand you?
>>
>> kh
>>
>
> cd in there and look around. x86_64 only has a boot directory and when
> you look at the bzImage file in it you find it's a lin
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
>> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
>>> has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
>>> did this happ
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
>> has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
>> did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386?
>>
>
> yes. Th
Daniel D Jones wrote:
I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm getting
the following:
<=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4 ("<=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4" is blocking
kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0)
Is there an issue with 3.5 and 4.2 being installed together? Is the above
block
Grant wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can get a copy of the 2006.0 minimal LiveCD
> iso? According to this:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
>
> "If you want to use the minimal CD on a smaller key or boot a system, you need to follow the procedure described in this document
> with a
as i see the bug has been declared fixed so must be safe to use the
latest livecd
I have an old 2006.0 cd. I can make an ISO image if you have a place for me to
upload it to.
From: Grant [mailto:emailgr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sun 2/1/2009 4:09 PM
To: Gentoo mailing list
Subject: [gentoo-user] Where can I download 2006.0 minimal LiveCD?
Does an
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Grant wrote:
> Does anyone know where I can get a copy of the 2006.0 minimal LiveCD
> iso? According to this:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
>
> "If you want to use the minimal CD on a smaller key or boot a system, you need to follow the procedure describ
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of the 2006.0 minimal LiveCD
iso? According to this:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/liveusb.xml
"If you want to use the minimal CD on a smaller key or boot a
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
since kde-4.2 seems be to unblocked now, I'd like to try it.
But there are 408 (!) blocked packages.
emerge --unmerge kde-meta
didn't do anything.
You need an "emerge -a --depclean" after unmerging all -meta packages.
But usually this won't work either since most p
Grant wrote:
One of my systems needed Real Time Clock -> PC-style 'CMOS' enabled in
the kernel to prevent a Hardware Clock error at startup and to make
the 'hwclock' command work. Another of my systems doesn't have Real
Time Clock kernel support enabled at all, and yet 'hwclock' works
fine. Doe
Marc Arens-3 wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:10:30 -0800 (PST)
> reQuiem23 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
>> >
>> > reQuiem23 schrieb:
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
>> >> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with
>> >> removable media.
>> >> It was not an upgrad
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:10:30 -0800 (PST)
reQuiem23 wrote:
>
>
>
> Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
> >
> > reQuiem23 schrieb:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with
> >> removable media.
> >> It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a C
Hi All,
I do not seem to be able to run star with the correct options despite some
experimenting ... and was hoping you could correct my errors.
I seem to have done this successfully in the past, but I am getting
inappropriate results this time round. This is the fs I am trying to back
up:
==
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:31:27 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'm a little confused here... what exactly is in .version? Say if I
> wanted to identify the kernel as belonging to a specific machine.
> HOST is vm23. Now if I wanted to have an incrementing version string
> that included that host name
puyhon-updater solved my problem.
Cheers,
Arnau
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:41:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> emerge -C kde
> >> emerge --depclean -a
> >> emerge -av kde-meta
> >>
> >
> > That's what I was afraid of. Sigh. Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Could he just emerge -C kde then re-emerge whatever he wanted without
> having to reinstall a
Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:49:03 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote:
>>
>>> 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE
>>> package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10
On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Geralt wrote:
Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm
using
it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easier :-)
who needs an initramfs?
My laptop won't boot without
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:38:48 -0500, ABCD wrote:
>
>> To be precise, the config option CONFIG_LOCALVERSION appends a string to
>> the end of the kernel version, which installkernel uses to place the
>> kernel image.
>
> You can get the same effect by creating a file called
On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:49:03 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE
> > package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10?
> > (Without, that is, manually unbl
reQuiem23 wrote:
>
> Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
>
>> reQuiem23 schrieb:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable
>>> media.
>>> It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
>>> stick, the system recognizes it (as
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Uh, someone's confused here. It may very well be me but I'm not following you
> at all. The other post concerned startkde blocking kdelibs.
Yes. I'm sorry. You're using monolithic KDE. I don't remember if
startkde was part of kdebase. Mayb
On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:17:59 Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel D Jones
wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones
> >>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am t
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE
> package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10?
> (Without, that is, manually unblocking lots and lots of packages.) Can
> I simply install the
El Dom, 1 de Febrero de 2009, 18:27, Tom escribió:
> Does this then create a bzImage-versionstring file, and make install
> copies this to /boot/kernel-versionstring (and system.map and .config
> respectably)?
Yes.
> Also how exactly do you then need to build the kernel.
> Does a simple 'make' s
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:34:10 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > I can set the version, either in the kernel config with
> > CONFIG_LOCALVERSION
> > or by using a file
> > localversion
> > containing a version string?
>
> I am using the first way, don't know the second.
It works just the sam
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Tom wrote:
> >who needs an initramfs?
>
> Not me ;)
>
> But seeing this discussion, I've finally realised that I'm a dumbass.
> For ages now I've been manually copying the kernel, the system.map and
> the config around my filesystem. I've always wondered how on earth
> p
Arttu V. [09-02-01 17:49]:
> Mr Cramer, you replied in private email, but your blacklist bounced/dropped
> my
> consequent reply. Replying on-list:
>
> On Saturday 31 January 2009 18:07:02 you wrote:
> > But emerge tolds me:
> >
> > emerge -pv rasqual
> >
> > These are the packages that would b
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Geralt wrote:
> >> Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm using
> >> it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easie
>who needs an initramfs?
Not me ;)
But seeing this discussion, I've finally realised that I'm a dumbass.
For ages now I've been manually copying the kernel, the system.map and
the config around my filesystem. I've always wondered how on earth
people manage who do a lot of kernel testing without
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones
> wrote:
>> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm
>> > getting the following:
>>
>> You'll need kd
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Geralt wrote:
>> Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm using
>> it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easier :-)
>
> who needs an initramfs?
>
>
Me of course ;-)
I hav
Florian Philipp-4 wrote:
>
> reQuiem23 schrieb:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable
>> media.
>> It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
>> stick, the system recognizes it (as you can see in the output of tail
On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:40:29 Norberto Bensa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones
wrote:
> > I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm
> > getting the following:
>
> You'll need kde-3.5.10 (or kdebase-startkde at least)
>
> Look in the archive
2009/2/1 Philip Webb :
> http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/dn16497-international-wildbird-competition/2
>
That is a proof that Gentoo is beautiful enough to win prizes with it :).
--
Currently developing a browsergame...
http://www.p-game.de
Trade - Expand - Fight
Follow me at twitter!
http:/
Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2009 17:26:23 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> who needs an initramfs?
Those with an encrypted root fs?
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Geralt wrote:
>> Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm using
>> it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easier :-)
>
> who needs an initramfs?
>
Me of course! I have root
Mr Cramer, you replied in private email, but your blacklist bounced/dropped my
consequent reply. Replying on-list:
On Saturday 31 January 2009 18:07:02 you wrote:
> But emerge tolds me:
>
> emerge -pv rasqual
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies.
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Geralt wrote:
> Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm using
> it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easier :-)
who needs an initramfs?
Nobody here using the genkernel package to build his kernel? I'm using
it all the time, makes initramfs creation so much easier :-)
reQuiem23 schrieb:
Hello all,
I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable media.
It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
stick, the system recognizes it (as you can see in the output of tail
/var/log/messages), but nautilus doesn't show a
>> One of my systems needed Real Time Clock -> PC-style 'CMOS' enabled in
>> the kernel to prevent a Hardware Clock error at startup and to make
>> the 'hwclock' command work. Another of my systems doesn't have Real
>> Time Clock kernel support enabled at all, and yet 'hwclock' works
>> fine. Doe
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:38:03 +, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> As a second question, can anyone point me to an informative reference
> on ~arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3&chap=3
--
Neil Bothwick
Law of Mechanical Repair: After your hands become coated with
gre
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:38:22 +0100 (CET), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> since kde-4.2 seems be to unblocked now, I'd like to try it.
> But there are 408 (!) blocked packages.
>
> emerge --unmerge kde-meta
> didn't do anything.
>
> So, what's a feasible way to upgrade?
Use automunmask, as already men
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:38:48 -0500, ABCD wrote:
> To be precise, the config option CONFIG_LOCALVERSION appends a string to
> the end of the kernel version, which installkernel uses to place the
> kernel image.
You can get the same effect by creating a file called localversion
containing the strin
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm getting
> the following:
>
You'll need kde-3.5.10 (or kdebase-startkde at least)
Look in the archives, a similar question was posted a few days ago.
I have KDE 3.5 and 4.1 installed and am trying to upgrade to 4.2. I'm getting
the following:
<=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4 ("<=kde-base/kdebase-3.5.9-r4" is blocking
kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0)
Is there an issue with 3.5 and 4.2 being installed together? Is the above
block a known issue that's bei
Hello all,
I emerged Gnome 2.24 and am now experiencing problems with removable media.
It was not an upgrade, but a new install. Whenever i insert a CD or USB
stick, the system recognizes it (as you can see in the output of tail
/var/log/messages), but nautilus doesn't show a desktop icon or even
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Grant wrote:
> Has anyone put
> something like that together?
Yes.
> Can I make use of the combined
> bandwidth and not just the redundancy?
Hm. If I understand you correctly, then no. You can't.
But you can -for example- use one link or the other based on sou
hi all,
i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services
in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the
pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so why
is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same?
Hi,
since kde-4.2 seems be to unblocked now, I'd like to try it.
But there are 408 (!) blocked packages.
emerge --unmerge kde-meta
didn't do anything.
So, what's a feasible way to upgrade?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen U
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:09:12 -0700 (MST), Dmitry Makovey wrote:
> Now my question is: how safe is it to do a workaround, and create local
> version of kde-base/kdelibs-4.2.0-r1 ebuild (say, -r2) which removes
> the block and just stick with 3.5.9 on 3.5 side ? I really don't feel
> like unmasking
90 matches
Mail list logo
