On Monday 19 January 2009 06:32:00 Grant Edwards wrote:
> > This has now been fixed, the engine is now in a package called
> > xulrunner which firefox builds against. Other apps also need
> > xulrunner, but if you keep "USE=firefox" intact those apps
> > will pull in all of firefox-2 just to get ge
On Sunday 18 January 2009 23:57:24 Wojtek Dalętka wrote:
> I would like to write my first post here just to inform you that I also
> had this problem with avahi and pygtk.
> Avahi failed to emerge and I had to remove pygtk from my use flags, than
> it compiled OK.
>
> I was just interested if remo
In ,
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> But, I stand by my assertion that give just the message very many
> people are going to figure out that it means you need to replace the
> "firefox" use flag with the "xulrunner" use flag so that apps will
> build against firefox
On 2009-01-18, Willie Wong wrote:
> You have way too much faith in the education system provided by
> English speaking countries.
+1 QOTW
> Of course, you can bloody-well argue, by way of Henry Higgins,
> that "in America they haven't spoken [English] for years." :)
Rather more OT:
I once hea
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> Now I'm confused. I thought xulrunner was the user-interface
> engine rather than the rendering engine.
>
>
Somewhat on topic here. I use Seamonkey for my browser. Should I use
xulrunner too? It is disabled right now but do I need to turn it on?
Just curious.
Dale
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-19, Dale wrote:
>
>
>>> Try looking through (most recent, I believe - Jan 10) 'Trouble with
>>> portage' thread, started by econti with answers from AllenJB.
>>>
>> I would add in xulrunner if you can search the body of the message
>> instead of just the
On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
compile, if after installing firefox 3.0 you get some
blockers, please add 'xulrunner' to your USE-flags.
Does anybody have idea what the above sentence is trying to sa
On 2009-01-19, Dale wrote:
>> Try looking through (most recent, I believe - Jan 10) 'Trouble with
>> portage' thread, started by econti with answers from AllenJB.
>
> I would add in xulrunner if you can search the body of the message
> instead of just the subject line. I keep mine local and Seam
On 2009-01-18, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:36 + (UTC)
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Do we get any clues as to what to search for? I searched back a
>> few weeks looking for subject lines containing "firefox" and
>> didn't find anything relevent.
>
> Try looking through (mo
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:36 + (UTC)
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>
>> Do we get any clues as to what to search for? I searched back a
>> few weeks looking for subject lines containing "firefox" and
>> didn't find anything relevent.
>>
>
> Try looking through (most
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 20:10:36 Willie Wong wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:49:10PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon
>>
> squawked:
>
>>> If I read that message out loud, it sounds suspiciously like a babelfish
>>> translation from Japanese to English.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Christopher Walters
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the
>> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to
>> read this?
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the
> blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to
> read this?
>
>Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at
>
Hi,
I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the
blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to
read this?
Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at
the same or is only about qt and possibly the USE flags I've got?
I tried remo
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:43:19 +
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 00:25:49 »Q« wrote:
>
> > I also have a 1280x800 screen and uvesafb works for me without
> > distortion with this kernel video option in grub.conf:
> >
> > video=uvesafb:1280x800-32,mtrr:3,ywrap
>
> Do you hav
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2009 06:38:15 Richard Watson wrote:
I'm sorry about the delay in closing this. I finally figured out if I
remove "-pipe" from my /etc/make.conf CFLAGS that all my compile errors go
away. Looking at the reference on the subject this option tells GCC not t
On Sunday 18 January 2009 20:12:28 Grant wrote:
> >> I have some users on a system and some services. How can I make sure
> >> only certain users can log into certain services? Do I need to
> >> explicitly define which users can log into each service? Are there
> >> different types of users so t
On Sunday 18 January 2009 20:10:36 Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:49:10PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon
squawked:
> > If I read that message out loud, it sounds suspiciously like a babelfish
> > translation from Japanese to English. Whatever it is, the author of the
> > messa
>> I have some users on a system and some services. How can I make sure
>> only certain users can log into certain services? Do I need to
>> explicitly define which users can log into each service? Are there
>> different types of users so that some can only log into certain
>> services?
>>
>> Fo
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:49:10PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked:
> If I read that message out loud, it sounds suspiciously like a babelfish
> translation from Japanese to English. Whatever it is, the author of the
> message is certainly not a native English speaker.
You have way t
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 08:39:58PM -0200, Penguin Lover Fernando Antunes
squawked:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Fernando Antunes wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> > I looking for a way to see/monitor messages sent to the tty when a running
> > X programs.
> > I tryed xconsole, but it only works with /dev/
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:44:40 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:02:10 Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> I just build firefox and noticed the following warning in the
> >> ebuild output, and I'm a bit baffled by the grammar:
> >>
> >> All
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:03:36 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Do we get any clues as to what to search for? I searched back a
> few weeks looking for subject lines containing "firefox" and
> didn't find anything relevent.
Try looking through (most recent, I believe - Jan 10) 'Trouble with
port
David Relson writes:
> How about an external tool? I use sed to fill in LOCALVERSION, e.g.
>
> V=$( date "+%m%d.%H%M" )
> cp -p .config .config.old
> sed s/LOCALVERSION.*/LOCALVERSION=\"$V\"/ < .config.old > .config
>
> make vmlinux modules modules_install
Ahaa ... that looks just like
On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
>> compile, if after installing firefox 3.0 you get some
>> blockers, please add 'xulrunner' to your USE-flags.
>>
>> Does anybody have idea what the above sentence is trying to say?
>
> It'
On 2009-01-18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:02:10 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I just build firefox and noticed the following warning in the
>> ebuild output, and I'm a bit baffled by the grammar:
>>
>> All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
>> compile, if
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:02:10 Grant Edwards wrote:
> I just build firefox and noticed the following warning in the
> ebuild output, and I'm a bit baffled by the grammar:
>
> All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
> compile, if after installing firefox 3.0 you get some
>
I just build firefox and noticed the following warning in the
ebuild output, and I'm a bit baffled by the grammar:
All the packages built against mozilla-firefox won't
compile, if after installing firefox 3.0 you get some
blockers, please add 'xulrunner' to your USE-flags.
Does an
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:45:04 -0600
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Robert Bridge writes:
>
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:36:42 -0600
> > rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
> >> What I asked was if there is some tricky syntax I could use on that
> >> kernel setting that would do: linux-2.6.26-gentoo-$HOST-N
> >> Wher
> On Sunday 18 January 2009 10:37:56 Dale wrote:
> > Most Canon cameras that I have read about are p2p or something. It
> > should just work but maybe there is something specific about your model
> > or they are changing the camera part.
>
> ~2-3 months ago all did work.
>
> > I'm just glad I like
On Saturday 17 January 2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
> But, now that you mention it, something in /dev was wrong
> because the first time I booted Gentoo off hda2, the "issue"
> message that's displayed before the login prompt gave
> instructions on how to fix /dev. I never figured out what
> exactl
On Sunday 18 January 2009 00:25:49 »Q« wrote:
> I also have a 1280x800 screen and uvesafb works for me without
> distortion with this kernel video option in grub.conf:
>
> video=uvesafb:1280x800-32,mtrr:3,ywrap
Do you have that resolution available in your BIOS? I read somewhere that
uvesafb ca
32 matches
Mail list logo
