Hi Max,
I'll say a few things about the T3400 and nVidia graphics support
since that's what I have personal experience with-
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:33 AM, iprmaster wrote:
> 2. Dell Precision Workstation T 3400: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E8200
> (2.66GHz, 4MB Cache, 1066MHz FSB)375W,4GB (4 x
»Q« wrote:
> In <49657ecd.7060...@gmail.com>,
> Hung Dang wrote:
>
>
>> References:
>> <58965d8a0901071528u464c7aa7w8cd5bcfab7530...@mail.gmail.com>
>> <496544cc.5050...@xs4all.nl> <49656893.2040...@podgeweb.com>
>>
>
>
>> Hi all,
>> I have a strange problem that the resolv.conf file
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> I actually did an emerge -ef world already just to ensure everything
> is here. I'm considering the emerge -C nss, remove any links left over
> by hand, and then emerging evolution again and letting it pull it in
> and build it in one step.
>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:21 PM, James Ausmus wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*"?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
>> >> >> /usr/lib/nss
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Paul Hartman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>>
Paul Hartman wrote on 08/01/09 00:28:
> Hi,
>
> Nor
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus
> wrote:
>
> >> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*"?
> >> >> >
> >> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
> >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
> >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus wrote:
>> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*"?
>> >> >
>> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
>> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
>> >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12
>> >> lightning ~ #
>> >
>> > Aha! And which of the versioned
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:47:15PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
> > that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
>
> revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>>> Paul Hartman wrote on 08/01/09 00:28:
Hi,
Normally I'm using SSH with regular password login, and I've read
a
You could use iptables to block all traffic headed to port 80 with
exceptions for the domains you need.
--
kyle.ba...@gmail.com
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:33:27 +0100
iprmaster wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am going to buy a new desktop PC and, because of some reasons I
> cannot explain here in details, I have to choose among these
> configurations (ordered by increasing price ;-) ):
>
> 1. FSC ESPRIMO P5625 E80+ uBTX: MCP78B
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 A
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> /usr/lib/gcc
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
>> >> warning: li
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> >> warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11,
> >> not found (
Hi,
Just another workaround for this problem. The ones presented in that thread
didn't work for me.
I used the "open with terminal option" in konqueror to get around this emacs
probelm but didn't like the fact that there was always a extra terminal
window hanging around so I use dcop to hide that
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus wrote:
>>
>>
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
>> warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11,
>> not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
>> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undef
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 03:15, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> Qian Qiao wrote:
>
>>
>> Such information is in the header of every message you get from the list.
>>
>
> Thank you for that. I normally do not view headers detailed and had
> overlooked it as an option.
>
Many list softwares add those informati
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus
> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild want
> >>> to do different things. revdep-rebuild
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Dale wrote:
> Daryl Styrk wrote:
>>
>
> Did you fall and you can't get up or what? :-p
ROFL!
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
>
Qian Qiao wrote:
>
> Such information is in the header of every message you get from the list.
>
Thank you for that. I normally do not view headers detailed and had
overlooked it as an option.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 03:05, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> Tence T. George wrote:
>> errr...what's seems to be the problem?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>
> Sorry I was looking for the list mailman.. I deleted the initial
> "Welcome to the list" containing the usual
Tence T. George wrote:
> errr...what's seems to be the problem?
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote:
>
>>
>
Sorry I was looking for the list mailman.. I deleted the initial
"Welcome to the list" containing the usual (sometimes) commands for
manipulating the subscriptions.
Daryl Styrk wrote:
>
Did you fall and you can't get up or what? :-p
Dale
:-) :-)
errr...what's seems to be the problem?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild want
>>> to do different things. revdep-rebuild is rebuilding nss which may or
>>> may not fail. @preserved-rebuild
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus wrote:
>>
>> Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild want
>> to do different things. revdep-rebuild is rebuilding nss which may or
>> may not fail. @preserved-rebuild wanted to rebuild eveolution which
>> did fail.
>
> I would
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> Paul Hartman wrote on 08/01/09 00:28:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Normally I'm using SSH with regular password login, and I've read
>>> about generating a keypair and having a password-less connection
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> >> I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
> >> @preserved-rebuild aren't necessarily to be followed, o
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't
>> rebuilding since the emerge step fails.
>
> It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer libraries.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
>> @preserved-rebuild aren't necessarily to be followed, or at least not
>> worried about if they fail as whatever program
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't
> rebuilding since the emerge step fails.
It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer libraries.
> What to do? Just sit and wait until someone updates somethi
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
> @preserved-rebuild aren't necessarily to be followed, or at least not
> worried about if they fail as whatever program needs the libraries
> still has the old versions?
They sho
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
>> that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
>
> revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
> breaka
On Donnerstag 08 Januar 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
> > that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
>
> revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
> breakage
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
> "Mark Knecht" writes:
>
>> Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
>> that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
>
> It allows the affected packages to continue working until the rebuild is
> done. With the 'old' revdep-reb
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
> that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
breakage in the first place.
--
Neil Bothwick
Use the Force, Luke,
"Mark Knecht" writes:
> Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
> that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
It allows the affected packages to continue working until the rebuild is
done. With the 'old' revdep-rebuild, a program using a library whose
version was incremented by
I've had this come up a few times over the last few weeks. Every time
I've done the command the emerge has failed somewhere along the way.
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
Granted, I have no way of knowing whether revdep-rebuild
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote on 08/01/09 00:28:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Normally I'm using SSH with regular password login, and I've read
>> about generating a keypair and having a password-less connection that
>> way. Is there a way to require both the key AND a pas
In <49657ecd.7060...@gmail.com>,
Hung Dang wrote:
> References:
> <58965d8a0901071528u464c7aa7w8cd5bcfab7530...@mail.gmail.com>
> <496544cc.5050...@xs4all.nl> <49656893.2040...@podgeweb.com>
> Hi all,
> I have a strange problem that the resolv.conf file is reset to the
> default file every tim
Hi, thank all you guys!
I give up rsh and trying using ssh now. I stiil find some problem and
have started a new thread.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Matt Harrison
wrote:
> Chuanwen Wu wrote:
>>
>> I guess maybe rsh does not allow to login as root.
>
> Probably not, RSH was abandoned years ag
Hi,
I am trying to use iozone to test my cluster with ssh but not rsh, but
I still can't running iozone on multiple nodes.
I have two nodes node73 and node74 in my LAN. And each node is able to
execute commands on another one without being challenged for a
password with user "dnfs":
d...@node73 ~
Matt Harrison wrote:
> Chuanwen Wu wrote:
>> I guess maybe rsh does not allow to login as root.
>
> Probably not, RSH was abandoned years ago and I'm surprised there are
> any applications still around that haven't moved to ssh.
>
> Exposing the root user to an already unsafe transmission is asking
On Wednesday January 7 2009 22:11:56 Dave Jones wrote:
>
> Entering a passphrase encrypts the private part of the key, which you keep
> only on the server. You only need the public part of the key on the client.
Try it the other way: private on the client. Public on the server.
The private part
On Thursday 08 January 2009 04:51:27 Matt Harrison wrote:
> RSH was abandoned years ago and I'm surprised there are any applications
> still around that haven't moved to ssh.
$ equery l rsh
[ Searching for package 'rsh' in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] net-misc/netkit-
Hi everyone,
If you don't want dhcpcd to overwrite your resolv.conf
then tell it not to configure the DNS.
The configuration can be made through your /etc/conf.d/net file :
config_eth0=( "dhcp" )
dhcp_eth0="nodns nontp nonis"
That's the "nodns" which take care of not touching your resolv.conf
49 matches
Mail list logo
