[gentoo-user] nautilus keeps reloading

Hi list :) I've been running gnome 2.22 since it made unstable, and today I just upgraded to the 2.22.1 minor release. However, since that (or some other) upgrade, every time I right left or middle click on a file on my desktop or in a folder, nautilus dies and starts again (closing all open wind

Re: [gentoo-user] blocking package can't be found

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 19:51 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Dale wrote: > > Uwe Thiem wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > emerge --update world tells me: > > > [blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking > > > dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2) > > > > > > emerge --unmerge gtk-doc-

Re: [gentoo-user] python - *** glibc detected ***

On Donnerstag, 10. April 2008, Nicolai Beuermann wrote: > Hello list, > a few days ago my creative urge forced me to learn python. As a first step > I wanted to control ecasound by script. > What a pity that it doesn't work. > > kernel: > It's a 64bit applepro with Linux 2.6.22-sabayon #16 SMP PRE

[gentoo-user] python - *** glibc detected ***

Hello list, a few days ago my creative urge forced me to learn python. As a first step I wanted to control ecasound by script. What a pity that it doesn't work. kernel: It's a 64bit applepro with Linux 2.6.22-sabayon #16 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 27 19:33:05 CET 2007 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

I just use bind - setup to lookup from my ISP's nameservers and cache only. The main reason for this was my ISP's ones are very slow (sometime 0.5 s to resolve!) - turning on the cache made an enormous difference to the perceived performance. Cheers Mark Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, I'm fed

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

Mark Knecht pisze: On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Marzan, Richard non Unisys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -Original Message- > From: Mark Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Those of us on the Gentoo-amd64 list welcome you to come join us. > > - Mark > --

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Marzan, Richard non Unisys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Those of us on the Gentoo-amd64 list welcome you to come join us. > > > > - Mark > > -- > > > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.or

[gentoo-user] Re: local caching DNS?

Uwe Thiem wrote: On Wednesday 09 April 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? conside

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash

Roman Zilka pisze: Hello, I don't have any specific idea, but try recompiling Firefox without any CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set. Using another Flash implementation (Gnash/Adobe) might solve the problem too (or introduce new problems:). Also try cleaning up your Firefox profile (in terms of add-ons, most i

Re: [gentoo-user] blocking package can't be found

On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Dale wrote: > Uwe Thiem wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > emerge --update world tells me: > > [blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking > > dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2) > > > > emerge --unmerge gtk-doc-am tells me: > > --- Couldn't find 'gtk-doc-am' to unmerge. > > > > So

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: local caching DNS?

On Wednesday 09 April 2008, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: > Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > > or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? > > cons

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

> -Original Message- > From: Mark Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 12:26 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze! > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Gyuszk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Iain Buchanan wr

[gentoo-user] Re: local caching DNS?

Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? consider maradns - It is a recu

Re: [gentoo-user] blocking package can't be found

Uwe Thiem wrote: Hi folks, emerge --update world tells me: [blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2) emerge --unmerge gtk-doc-am tells me: --- Couldn't find 'gtk-doc-am' to unmerge. So let's be more specific: emerge --unmerge =dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10 tells me

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:01:33 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > I use dnsmasq, can be used as a LAN cache too (by simply allowing > > requests from a given interface). Took me about 30 minutes to > > configure. I asked dhcp to save to resolv.conf.2 and made resolv.conf > > to request from localhost.

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Andrew Gaydenko wrote: Hi! === On Wednesday 09 April 2008, you wrote: === ... Does not seem to matter here much, since I suspend, not turn off. But anyway, most DNS names should be cached only few hours, half a day or so (well, there are some that have week long timeouts, but not many).

[gentoo-user] blocking package can't be found

Hi folks, emerge --update world tells me: [blocks B ] dev-util/gtk-doc-am (is blocking dev-util/gtk-doc-1.8-r2) emerge --unmerge gtk-doc-am tells me: --- Couldn't find 'gtk-doc-am' to unmerge. So let's be more specific: emerge --unmerge =dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10 tells me: --- Couldn't find

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

vorner wrote > I use dnsmasq, can be used as a LAN cache too (by simply allowing > requests from a given interface). Took me about 30 minutes to configure. > I asked dhcp to save to resolv.conf.2 and made resolv.conf to request > from localhost. OK this works fine, thanks. However, udhcpd cannt b

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash

Hello, I don't have any specific idea, but try recompiling Firefox without any CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set. Using another Flash implementation (Gnash/Adobe) might solve the problem too (or introduce new problems:). Also try cleaning up your Firefox profile (in terms of add-ons, most importantly). -rz >

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

> > I received my RMAed motherboard back from MSI today, and although it > > powered right on, the BIOS wouldn't post unless I disconnected the > > CDROM drive and used a different CPU. I had been overclocking an > > AMD64 X2 but luckily I had a Sempron to test with. > > > > Does this sound

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Ralf Stephan ha scritto: Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? Regards, ralf what about dnscache of djbdns tools? took 2 minutes

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Hi! === On Wednesday 09 April 2008, you wrote: === ... > > Does not seem to matter here much, since I suspend, not turn off. But > anyway, most DNS names should be cached only few hours, half a day or > so (well, there are some that have week long timeouts, but not many). Not sure I have n

[gentoo-user] firefox crash when playing flash

Hi all, My firefox crashed sometimes when the page contained flash file. -- emerge -pv mozilla-firefox These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.13 USE="ipv6 -bindist -debu

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

On Wed, 09 Apr 2008, Ralf Stephan wrote: > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? I'm using the DNS of my router (D-Link DSL-500G). Works

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Hello On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:45:18PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > > > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > > > or caching DNS

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

=== On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: === > Hello > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > > or caching D

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:13:40 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote: > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? net-dns/dnsmasq -- Neil Bothwick Deja

Re: [gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Hello On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote: > I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my > browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache > or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? I use dnsmasq, can be used as

[gentoo-user] local caching DNS?

Hello, I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend? Regards, ralf -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Overclocked CPU killed motherboard and CD?

On Mittwoch, 9. April 2008, Grant wrote: > I received my RMAed motherboard back from MSI today, and although it > powered right on, the BIOS wouldn't post unless I disconnected the > CDROM drive and used a different CPU. I had been overclocking an > AMD64 X2 but luckily I had a Sempron to test wit

Re: [gentoo-user] mtune=k6-2 and a *small* upgrade

Shawn Haggett wrote: There's two points that come to mind. 1) mtune is a request for the compiler to make the code more suited to the given processor, but without breaking compatibility. march is telling the compiler, do everything you can to make this code fastest on this processor. From