How can i allocate memory to tomcat instance on gentoo
I received my RMAed motherboard back from MSI today, and although it
powered right on, the BIOS wouldn't post unless I disconnected the
CDROM drive and used a different CPU. I had been overclocking an
AMD64 X2 but luckily I had a Sempron to test with.
Does this sound like a case of an overclocked
Anthony Metcalf wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Now the existing system should work with your new hardware and you can
update your CFLAGS and 'emerge -e world' at your leisure.
That's the theory at least anyway :-)
Well, exactly. That is the theory. I want to know the likelihood of
success. I
> I agree that your script is nice and simple, and hence less prone to
> errors. I coded mine in c++ because I use it not only for a machine
> type watchdog, but also a task based watchdog that reboots the machine
> based on certain tasks living or not. Each task has to register with
> the watch
I've just booted kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r4 and I noticed an WARNING: message
about ignoring bad line 159 in /etc/modprobe.conf. This is the infamous
line:
probeall /dev/svga svgalib_helper
Have you noticed anything similar? Why does it happen?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:02:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
If you have the time before the transition, you could set CFLAGS to
something really generic, like -mcpu=i586 and emerge -e system, as well
as recompiling the kernel. Then move the disks over. That way, you'll
k
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:02:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> Well, exactly. That is the theory. I want to know the likelihood of
> success. I know that using mtune=k6-2 means it won't run on anything
> before a k6-2, and most likely not on anything Intel, due to the
> symbols and optimisations u
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can i install 3 instance of Tomcat Server on a single host
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Kaushal
>
http://markmail.org/search/?q=3%20instance%20of%20Tomcat%20Server%20list%3Aorg.apache.tomcat.user/#query:3%20instance%20of%20Tomcat%20Server%20list%3Aorg.apache
Hi,
How can i install 3 instance of Tomcat Server on a single host
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
Alan McKinnon wrote:
OK, so it's 32 bit on an amd64 you'll be doing
Initially yes, I'll look into 64bit as need arises.
I would reconfigure the kernel and include things that you know ought to
be there. Then move the disks over and see if it boots. Rinse, repeat,
till it does.
Wel
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 15:43 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> >
> >> � � But what else? Will mtune=k6-2 make executables that will run on
> >> an Athlon 64? Anyone tried this? Would I get to a point where I could
> >> mak
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> >> � � But what else? Will mtune=k6-2 make executables that will run
> >> on an Athlon 64? Anyone tried this? Would I get to a point where I
> >> could make -e world and ha
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:43:16 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> Later when I upgrade to a phenom, and stick 1GB RAM per core in there,
> then yeah, I will probably recompile into 64bit, but that can be done
> in a chroot, and migrated fairly easily I would expect, so long as the
> system is running
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
� � But what else? Will mtune=k6-2 make executables that will run on
an Athlon 64? Anyone tried this? Would I get to a point where I could
make -e world and have a nice working system?
k6 is 32 bit right?
There's no
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> But what else? Will mtune=k6-2 make executables that will run on
> an Athlon 64? Anyone tried this? Would I get to a point where I could
> make -e world and have a nice working system?
k6 is 32 bit right?
There's no sane upgrade path to amd64
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want
>> just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach.
>>
>> If you, however, want everything but a few package
Hi! In the last few days, Knetworkmanager doesn't show available
connections info anymore, before this problem i can always see info about
available connections just putting the mouse pointer in every entry of
Knetworkmanager. Is pretty useful for me this,.
I am using x86, i have Knerworkmanage
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want
> just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach.
>
> If you, however, want everything but a few packages, then the
> current approach isn't so fine anymo
Hi All,
An interesting theoretical question. I have a K6-2 with a SATA card
sitting in it, with two drives, which are happily soft-mirrored, with
LVM layered on top, and a nice big iSCSI partition that gets shared to
my laptop whenever it's home.
It runs postfix (with all the assoc
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:36:45 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
>> >> should NOT be the way they are right now.
>> >
>> > Such as?
>>
>> Finer control, without cluttering the world fil
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:36:45 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
> >> should NOT be the way they are right now.
> >
> > Such as?
>
> Finer control, without cluttering the world file.
What could be finer than picking which packa
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:42:51 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > NEVER unmerge a system package without building a binary package
> > first.
>
> Tut, tut. Neil, where's the fun in that?
The fun is in learning the rule in the first place. It's like making
backups, no one does it because someone else
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> >> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
> >> should NOT be the way they are right now.
> >
> > Such as?
>
> Finer
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
should NOT be the way they are right now.
Such as?
Finer control, without clutter
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
I have :-)
I've also removed (forcibly) all versions of gcc, portage, and glibc
individually and all together. quickpkg is a nice thing to know
about :-)
I got that covered. I found this little tid bit of info. OP may want
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> > I think you need to fix your world before before doing any
> > --depclean steps.
>
> Seems like :)
Probably not now that we have the full picture though
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mai
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:08:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc
> > and it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse
> > than removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . .
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
> >> That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
> >> needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
> >> had anything serious removed by using this in ages
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
>> should NOT be the way they are right now.
>
> Such as?
Finer control, without cluttering the world file.
> Hint: unclut
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:20:21 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Which majorly sucks, as there are good reasons why the packages
> should NOT be the way they are right now.
Such as?
Hint: uncluttering the world file is not a reason for changing the
ebuilds, lthough it is a good reason for a more fr
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:01:31 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> > But that's exactly what it's for "merge this to pull in all
> > non-developer, split kde-base/* packages".
>
> Not all -meta packages behave like that - eg. the gst-plugins-meta
> package only pulls in, what's wanted (per USE flags
Anthony Metcalf wrote:
Dale wrote:
It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and
it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than
removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional.
Sort of fun to fix.
Dale
:-) :-)
Tell me about
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:08:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
> It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and it
> is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than
> removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. Sort
> of fun to fix.
NEVER unmerge
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> > Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages.
>> > What
>>
>> For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6.
>
> Yes, I see now. --depclean is removing old SLOTS and the origina
Dale wrote:
It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and
it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than
removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional.
Sort of fun to fix.
Dale
:-) :-)
Tell me about it!
Hint: Don't then un
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
had anything serious removed by using this in ages but strange things
can happen. You need to be carefu
Michael Schmarck wrote:
KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What
For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6.
is the output of for example:
emerge -avP gcc
?
$ emerge -avP gcc
superuser access is required... a
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> > Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages.
> > What
>
> For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6.
Yes, I see now. --depclean is removing old SLOTS and the original output
is either very unverbose, or has been trim
Hello.
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> >> > emerge --depclean
>> >>
>> >> thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed.
KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What
For gcc: Yes. It's about time to dump gcc-3.4.6.
> is the output of for example:
> emerge -avP gcc
> ?
$ emerge -avP gcc
superuser access is required... adding --pretend to options.
Calculat
Maybe he does have multiple versions installed of those packages. What
is the output of for example:
emerge -avP gcc
?
KH
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmar
Hi,
I use following approach:
emerge --sync
emerge -DuavN world
dispatch-conf
emerge --depclean -pv
revdep-rebuild
glsa-check -t all
Whenever there is something changed on the way, I will start with the
world command again. Sometimes depclean will remove something world will
emerge again. I wa
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> >> > emerge --depclean
> >>
> >> thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed. Quite a
> >> lot.
> >
> > If you've removed kde-meta, I'
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> Well, I disagree. I want to install almost all of the KDE stuff,
>> but eg. not the PPP things, as I've got not use for that on that
>> system. But I still would like my world file *NOT* to be cluttered
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Well, I disagree. I want to install almost all of the KDE stuff,
> but eg. not the PPP things, as I've got not use for that on that
> system. But I still would like my world file *NOT* to be cluttered
> with a gazillion of kde packages.
>
> The cu
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:30:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
>> that I don't need (like kppp). It would be nice, if the kde-meta
>> ebuild would be more like the gst-plugins-meta package
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> > emerge --depclean
>>
>> thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed. Quite a
>> lot.
>
> If you've removed kde-meta, I'm not surprised.
It's not (mainly) kde packages that show u
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Thanks.
I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
that I don't need (like kppp). It would be nice, if the kde-meta
ebuild would be more like the gst-plugins-meta package, in that
it sould allow the user to specify what he wants to get installed
and
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Dale wrote:
> That will tell you packages that are installed and !may! not be
> needed by other packages. Note all the warnings here? I have not
> had anything serious removed by using this in ages but strange things
> can happen. You need to be careful with this. Remov
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> >> Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
> >> got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
> >> because th
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other option is to use the kde*meta ebuilds, which do directly
> > depend on the sub-ordinate packages. This is what I do and I don't
> > get the effect you observed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I think I remov
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:30:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
> that I don't need (like kppp). It would be nice, if the kde-meta
> ebuild would be more like the gst-plugins-meta package, in that
> it sould allow the user to specify wh
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (a
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:39:11 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> > emerge --depclean
>
> thanks. 200 some packages, which would be removed. Quite a
> lot.
If you've removed kde-meta, I'm not surprised.
> After removing stuff, a revdep-rebuild should be done, shouldn't
> it?
It won't hurt, alth
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Igor Mikushkin wrote:
> I'm just wondering why this package (sun-jdk-1.4.2.17) came into
> dependencies?
equery depends -a sun-jdk
I guess you have virtual/jdk:1.4 in world which picked up the latest 1.4
jdk
>
> Sorry, I have no assess to my gentoo machine now
> and I
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
>> got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
>> because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
>> like
Michael Schmarck wrote:
<>
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a dependency of
kde-meta and kd
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
> got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
> because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
> like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a dep
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other option is to use the kde*meta ebuilds, which do directly
> depend on the sub-ordinate packages. This is what I do and I don't get
> the effect you observed.
Thanks.
I think I removed kde-meta, because it installs too much stuff,
that I don't n
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Connected question: How do I quickly find all the packages that
got installed as a dependency, but which are no longer needed,
because the dependent package got removed (as an example, I'd
like to find kde-i18n, because that used to be a dependency of
kde-meta and kde-m
Anthony Metcalf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Schmarck wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>>
>>
>> How do I make emerge update all the installed packages, if
>> there's an update available?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
>>
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> First question, was it installed directly, or as a dependency f
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> In "prose": I have kde-i18n-3.5.8 installed. In tree, there's
> an update available (kde-i18n-3.5.9).
>
> Why was that updatedable package not picked up, when I ran
> emerge -DuvatN world? I also tried "emerge -Duvat world" -
> same effect.
kde-i
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:51:29 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
>
>> In "prose": I have kde-i18n-3.5.8 installed. In tree, there's
>> an update available (kde-i18n-3.5.9).
>>
>> Why was that updatedable package not picked up, when I ran
>> emerge -DuvatN wo
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:51:29 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
> In "prose": I have kde-i18n-3.5.8 installed. In tree, there's
> an update available (kde-i18n-3.5.9).
>
> Why was that updatedable package not picked up, when I ran
> emerge -DuvatN world? I also tried "emerge -Duvat world" -
> same
Michael Schmarck wrote:
Hello.
How do I make emerge update all the installed packages, if
there's an update available?
Thanks,
Michael
Hi,
First question, was it installed directly, or as a dependency for
something else? If directly, does it appear in the world file?
(/var/lib/por
Hello.
Maybe someone can explain this:
$ sudo emerge -DuvatN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
Nothing to merge; would you like to auto-clean packages? [Yes/No]
$ emerge -vp
I'm just wondering why this package (sun-jdk-1.4.2.17) came into dependencies?
Sorry, I have no assess to my gentoo machine now
and I can't find out the package where it came from.
Sun-jdk-1.6.x.x is already installed and
I think eclipse can run with 1.6 as well.
Why do I need two sun-jdk's?
--
67 matches
Mail list logo
