On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 15:25 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2007-12-31, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On (30/12/07 16:18) Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2007-12-28, Qian Qiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Would there be any reason to keep the older gcc 3.46? I'm
> >> >> n
On Dec 31, 2007 5:23 PM, Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using compiz-fusion on this list? I'm putting together a system
> I'll be using to demo linux. compiz-fusion appears to be the "eye-candy"
> that would make a demo shine. I see that its in portage (masked) any
> gotchas I sho
On 01/01/2008, Canek Peláez Valdés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2007 11:23 AM, Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone using compiz-fusion on this list? I'm putting together a system
> > I'll be using to demo linux. compiz-fusion appears to be the "eye-candy"
> > that would ma
On Monday 31 December 2007, Grant wrote:
> I'm running a hardened multilib profile and medium gr_security in the
> kernel. I get the following:
That warning is because those packages are binary blobs and depend on
the libstdc++ from gcc-4*. You'll have to wait till hardened gets GCC 4
or till t
Happy new year!
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 11:16 -0800, BRM wrote:
[snip]
> The system is set to boot off of /dev/hdb2 (ext2) and use /dev/hdb1 as
> the root. I believe the boot device is hd1,1 in grub terminology.
yep!
> The system has 3 hard drives: hda, hdb, and sda; as well as a dvd drive
> (hdc
I have an AMD64 system which I just installed the AMD64 Gentoo Image
onto, following AMD64 HowTo. However, I am having trouble getting grub
to find my kernel. I'm only using grub because of the warning about
LILO (which I much prefer due to the device naming convention it uses)
- I was using LILO u
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2007 11:23 AM, Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone using compiz-fusion on this list? I'm putting together a system
>> I'll be using to demo linux. compiz-fusion appears to be the "eye-candy"
>> that would make a demo shine. I see that its in por
On Dec 31, 2007 11:23 AM, Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone using compiz-fusion on this list? I'm putting together a system
> I'll be using to demo linux. compiz-fusion appears to be the "eye-candy"
> that would make a demo shine. I see that its in portage (masked) any
> gotchas I sh
Anyone using compiz-fusion on this list? I'm putting together a system
I'll be using to demo linux. compiz-fusion appears to be the "eye-candy"
that would make a demo shine. I see that its in portage (masked) any
gotchas I should be aware of before proceeding?
Ted Ozolins (VE7TVO)
Cranbrook,
Hello folks,
the Nouveau project works on free/opensource drivers for the
NVidia graphics chips.
As NVidia continously refuses support to opensource community
and keeps necessary specs secret, we are forced reverse engineer
their binary-only drivers. This is an very complex and time-
consumi
Hi folks,
I'd just want to let you know there's an petition to NV on
opening their driver code (or at least specs) to the free world:
* http://www.petitiononline.com/nvfoss/
Please sign the petition and spread around this link.
cu
--
On 2007-12-31, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (30/12/07 16:18) Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2007-12-28, Qian Qiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Would there be any reason to keep the older gcc 3.46? I'm
>> >> not familiar enough with Gentoo "under-the-hood" to decide.
>> >
>> >
I'm running a hardened multilib profile and medium gr_security in the
kernel. I get the following:
$ wengophone
./qtwengophone:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/32/libstdc++.so.6: version
`GLIBCXX_3.4.5' not found (required by ./qtwengophone)
./qtwengophone:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Hello
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 10:47:42PM +0100, Fred Kastl wrote:
>> i get this message 2 -3 times within a second. This floods my logfile.
>>
>> Dec 30 16:54:46 server kernel: scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead
>> device
>> Dec 30 16:54:47 server kernel: scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead
On Friday 28 December 2007 22:58:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
> out of its crib.
>
> I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
> Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored
> the post
On Monday 24 December 2007 18:31:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm attempting to remove X from a former desktop machine now going to
> see action as a semi-DMZ.
>
> What is the best way to go about removing X and all its files.
>
> Removing the basic x11-base/xorg-x11 is easy enough but there appea
Hello
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 10:47:42PM +0100, Fred Kastl wrote:
> i get this message 2 -3 times within a second. This floods my logfile.
>
> Dec 30 16:54:46 server kernel: scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
> Dec 30 16:54:47 server kernel: scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
> Dec
On Thursday 27 December 2007 23:15:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where can I see a condensed overview of what needs to be set in the
> kernel for maximum flexibility using iptables and snort?
In case you're still looking for an answer, you may find it in shorewall - I
use it for all my iptables
On Dec 29, 2:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
> out of its crib.
What package you are talking about? If you did not modified anything
unusual on your system, fill in bug report on that package... Do not
forgive emerge --info.
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2007 schrieb Thufir:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:16:26 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Are the device files (links) present in /dev (ll /dev/cdr*)?
>
> arrakis ~ #
> arrakis ~ # ll /dev/cdr*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Dec 30 23:11 /dev/cdrom -> hdc
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 D
20 matches
Mail list logo
