Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs I
> don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I tend
> to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an LVM partition for
> everything else.
What if you
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Thufir:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs I
> > don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I
> > tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> Hello Allan Gottlieb,
>
> > > On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> > > LVM partition for everything else.
> >
> > Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but thought that a
> > motivation was to be able to mo
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs I
> don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I tend
> to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an LVM partition for
> everything else.
Would
At Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:33:27 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Allan Gottlieb,
>
>> > On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
>> > LVM partition for everything else.
>>
>> Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but thought that a
>> motivat
Hello Allan Gottlieb,
> > On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> > LVM partition for everything else.
>
> Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but thought that a
> motivation was to be able to move space from one partition to another.
One physical partiti
[Sorry for the previous post just quoting neil--finger slip]
At Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> LVM partition for everything else.
Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but tho
At Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:03:47 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
>> > It's not an error really. You are not meant to mount /boot every
>> > time you boot - only when you want to change anything in it.
>>
>> There's nothing wr
Mick writes:
> Thanks Alex, I was trying your script, but just like Etaoin's script it
> does not go beyond level 1 in the directory. All the subdirectories and
> files within them stay in Capital Case.
>
> How can I change it to recursively look into the directory?
That's strange. I tried that
On Sunday 08 July 2007 22:57, Clara García wrote:
> Hello, I have a Huawei USB E220 modem wich works fine almost all the time.
> But sometimes when I connect, it seems to work OK (led turns continous blue
> and wvdial shows exactly the same as when the modem connects well, no
> errors) but there is
Hello, I have a Huawei USB E220 modem wich works fine almost all the time. But
sometimes when I connect, it seems to work OK (led turns continous blue and
wvdial shows exactly the same as when the modem connects well, no errors) but
there is no connection to the internet, I can't use anything re
On Monday 02 July 2007 22:47, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Mich writes:
> > I backed up my wife's WinXP fs using K3B and I used default settings
> > which unfortunately converted all file names to CAPITALS and shortened
> > them to 8 characters maximum, just like DOS would do. Is there a clever
> > way
On 7/8/07, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
The main camps we seem to be divided into are:
1. we don't want unskilled users
and:
2. we do want unskilled users
[...]
Yes, that's the situation.
I've used gentoo before, and went back to fedora, and am considering
coming back. I've never
On 7/8/07, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
You're welcome. How did you get the second NIC recognised? By removing the
module and then installing again?
Nope. Simply entering those command got things working. I copied
pasted to show how the network started off unavailable then, after
e
On 7/8/07, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is if you focus on usability for newbies, you'll focus
> less on features and customization, or you'll have to find a way to
> hide this customizability because customization confuses newbies, and
> spending time dancing around the lesser
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:32:04 +0200
Eduard Bachmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2007 schrieb Dan Farrell:
> > On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:08:11 +0200
> >
> > Eduard Bachmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to run a webserver on my PC. Since I am using a NAT-router
> > > for
The problem is if you focus on usability for newbies, you'll focus
less on features and customization, or you'll have to find a way to
hide this customizability because customization confuses newbies, and
spending time dancing around the lesser populace is time wasted on
doing practical stuff ( Wh
If gentoo became an *easy* distro like sickbayon or ubuntu.. I would
stop using it. Seriously.. user friendly distros is not what I am
looking for.. I am looking for a distro to have one fun and learn.
>>> I second this sentiment. Since starting to use Gentoo in 2004, all
>>> othe
Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2007 schrieb Dan Farrell:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:08:11 +0200
>
> Eduard Bachmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to run a webserver on my PC. Since I am using a NAT-router for
> > internet connection I need the server to have the same ip everytime.
> > That's why I tried
Hemmann, Volker Armin ha scritto:
On Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007, Alessandro del Gallo wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin ha scritto:
On Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007, Alessandro del Gallo wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin ha scritto:
when you su to portage and do an export, is QTDIR set too?
elwood ~ # su - porta
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:35:05 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/07/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mick gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >
> > > The wiki says not to use the FUSE module in the kernel, but to
> > > emerge it as a separate module. I don't think it says anything
> > > ab
> I did 'emerge sys-kernel/linux-headers'. It says it would be advised
> that you re-merge your system libc.
> Portage now builds - should I rebuild the libc nevertheless?
In my experience it's best to do exactly what portage says.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:28:23 -0400
Daniel D Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using Kmail for some time but am running into a couple of
> issues. I'm not sure if they're actually Kmail issues and if they're
> actually outside the Kmail program.
>
You do use IMAP right? POP would downlo
Kent Fredric gmail.com> writes:
> qt4 is in a different structure to qt3,
> for the actual programming part, i do believe its all set up for you.
> qmake -project
> qmake
> make
> thats all i had to do to build my first QT app :)
Hello Kent,
OK,
This looks easy...
I'll give it a whirl and
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:03:47 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
> > It's not an error really. You are not meant to mount /boot every
> > time you boot - only when you want to change anything in it.
>
> There's nothing wrong with having it mounted, only generally there's no
> reason to access it after bo
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2007, 16:00 -0400 schrieb Henk Boom:
> On 06/07/07, Marc Joliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, it doesn't exactly integrate with KDE, and 3 windows
> > (audacious, streamtuner, and an xterm for streamripper) are a tad
> > irritating, but hey, that's what virtual des
On 06/07/07, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> The wiki says not to use the FUSE module in the kernel, but to emerge it as a
> separate module. I don't think it says anything about not including the
> normal ntfs driver (I'm sure I have it built in mine).
I do not h
On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:55, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > Second, Kmail doesn't seem very adept at handling folders with lots of
> > messages.
>
> yes it does.
>
> > I have one folder which has about 40k messages in it. It's the
> > archives of a mailing list I run and I expect it to grow m
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 08:10:22 -0500, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > I'd like some help with comcorder capture in my Gentoo.
> > I already have my firewire working, but I need some soft (graphic,
> > please), with the tools to do it.
>
> I use dvgrab. It's not graphical, but it doesn't need to be.
B
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 09:53 -0300, Marco Antônio da Veiga wrote:
> I'd like some help with comcorder capture in my Gentoo.
> I already have my firewire working, but I need some soft (graphic,
> please), with the tools to do it.
I use dvgrab. It's not graphical, but it doesn't need to be.
--
Albe
I want to run a webserver on my PC. Since I am using a NAT-router for internet
connection I need the server to have the same ip everytime. That's why I
tried to use static routes.
The problem is that I get timeouts for about 25-75% of the time. DHCP works
without any problems (but I get differe
On Sunday 08 July 2007 09:32, Thufir wrote:
> I'm on the live cd, the IP address resolved :)
>
> livecd ~ # dhcpcd eth0 up
> Error, timed out waiting for a valid DHCP server response
> livecd ~ #
> livecd ~ # dhcpcd eth1 up
> livecd ~ #
> livecd ~ # ping 192.168.2.1
> PING 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1
Hi everyone,
I'd like some help with comcorder capture in my Gentoo.
I already have my firewire working, but I need some soft (graphic,
please), with the tools to do it.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 7/8/07, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:57, sain yan wrote:
> >Because you didn`t mount /boot?
>
> Yes! I find the erro in /etc/fstab
>
> /dev/sda7/boot ext3*noauto,*notime,noexec 0 0
It's not an error really. You are not meant to
only generally there's no reason to access it after boot
yes!!
==
I'm sorry for my poor english!!!
2007/7/7, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 16:16:26 +0200, Martin S wrote:
> What was missed, was - if the Live CD is so important, why not just
> nick it from Sabayon where it actually "works".
As does the 2007.0 live CD, at least it did for me, which the previous
efforts
I'm on the live cd, the IP address resolved :)
livecd ~ #
livecd ~ # cat /etc/gentoo-release
Gentoo Base System release 1.12.9
livecd ~ #
livecd ~ # whoami
root
livecd ~ #
livecd ~ # ping 192.168.2.1
connect: Network is unreachable
livecd ~ #
livecd ~ # ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
37 matches
Mail list logo
