Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Tim Allingham
Give this a try, haven't got a chance to test atm but should do what your after Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card1" Monitor"Monitor0" DefaultDepth24 SubSection "Display" Modes "1280x1024" Depth

RE: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:00 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Sec

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of > > > > specific persons ;-O > > > > well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes > > them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a > > civil manner usually so

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Davi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Gentoo's Project needs more people to help in develop, > docs and bugs... =) Well, for me, it seemed quite different - new people are unwelcomed, especially if the come with new/different ideas. > IF this (bugs) are, as YOU said, trivial, go on... Help

[gentoo-user] Touch screen

2007-06-06 Thread Rodrigo Forlin
I need your help!! Can someone point me a touch screen monitor that works under console? I've tried a tsharc (from hampshire) but it doesn't work even in X. I develop programs under console using framebuffer so i need also a nice api to make my programs work with touchscreen. I'm trying to use

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Davi
Em Quarta 06 Junho 2007 20:10, Enrico Weigelt escreveu: > * Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate > > > bugs to the responsible persons ? > > > > and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect > > and b) som

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating eix bombs

2007-06-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:41:09PM +0200, Vaeth wrote: > > > I resynced this morning, but nothing has changed. > > Resync once more. The patch was included in the tree today > without a revbump. Thanks you so much Vaeth! festus -- It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to hav

Re: [gentoo-user] alternatives to audacious?

2007-06-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Mestelan
More precisely, I meant : http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet http://www.exaile.org/ Also, Wikipedia is astonishingly knowledgeable about audio players, these days : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_media_players#Audio_players.07UNIQ4f732286383f389d-nowiki-0199-QINU1.07UNIQ4f7322863

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And then ? > > Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ? > > no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective.. It doesn't. Why do you assume it would ? > > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > First: Cosmetic things, i.e. user interface issues, pretty > pictures, and things that effect the overall look and feel. > > If they do not stop the program from functioning, they are > not high priority. It may be agitating to look at, bu

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, since your awesome efforts last time, everyone here already > knows you're the most polite bug reporter, absolutely fair and I'm really tired of your boring personal attacks. Can't you come up with some more interesting ? Maybe a polar wea

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2007, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > so first you went to the wrong bugzilla and made a big fuss. > > Then you went to the gentoo-bugzilla and made even more fuss. > > Yes, I first expected it to be an firefox bug, so I fil

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread felix
Complaining TWICE worked. The problem I complained about shouldn't have happened in the first place; someonex fixed something that wasn't broken and made it broken. Your response is absolutely typical of my problem with the gentoo dev community. You misstate a complaint, overreact to it, and app

Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so first you went to the wrong bugzilla and made a big fuss. > Then you went to the gentoo-bugzilla and made even more fuss. Yes, I first expected it to be an firefox bug, so I filed the bug there. After I found out that the ff source didn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating eix bombs

2007-06-06 Thread Vaeth
> mask.cc:(.text+0x1663): undefined reference to [...] This is a known issue with eix-0.9.8 and gcc-3.* with an easy fix. > I resynced this morning, but nothing has changed. Resync once more. The patch was included in the tree today without a revbump. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] gpm in elinks?

2007-06-06 Thread maxim wexler
Hi group, I'm using elinks(v0.11.12) in framebuffer mode. But I can't get select & paste to work on a web page. When I click on something and try highlighting it the page just scrolls up one line and nothing is saved to a buffer. However, gpm(v1.20.1-r5) works fine in the console. My mouse is a L

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Florian Philipp
Am Mittwoch 06 Juni 2007 20:46 schrieb Aleksey Kunitskiy: > On Wednesday 06 June 2007 21:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > Or, just switch the Device lines. Each device is a single DVI port (at > > least on my NVidia setup). > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating the system fails

2007-06-06 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 20:13, purple wrote: > well,you could unmerge all those crappy blocking packages if they arent in > toolchain group and then update your system with new packages and after > that adding packages you need.. > that procedure worked for me numerous times so i dont see the rea

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating the system fails

2007-06-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 20:54:30 Thierry de Coulon wrote: > I've a somewhat old system (it was installed with 2005.1 at the time) that > I wanted to try updating. > > However, emerge --update --pretend world thows an awfull lot of blocking > packages, mostly x11-something, but including KDE, java

Re: [gentoo-user] Updating the system fails

2007-06-06 Thread purple
well,you could unmerge all those crappy blocking packages if they arent in toolchain group and then update your system with new packages and after that adding packages you need.. that procedure worked for me numerous times so i dont see the reason why it shouldnt do the same for you.. just apply

[gentoo-user] Updating the system fails

2007-06-06 Thread Thierry de Coulon
Hello, I've a somewhat old system (it was installed with 2005.1 at the time) that I wanted to try updating. However, emerge --update --pretend world thows an awfull lot of blocking packages, mostly x11-something, but including KDE, java and others. There is no question of unmasking all these p

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Aleksey Kunitskiy
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 21:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Or, just switch the Device lines. Each device is a single DVI port (at > least on my NVidia setup). Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card1" Monitor"Monitor0" DefaultDepth24

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 15:10, John J. Foster wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:35:18AM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > That helps some, but in net-firewall I'm finding a lot of unstable > > packages, and no really good idea which ones will be the best for a > > personal firewall, let alone

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup': > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:42:59 +0300 > Aleksey Kunitskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Section "Screen" > > Identifier "Screen0" > > Device "C

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Aleksey Kunitskiy
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 19:54, Dan Farrell wrote: > Try switching the LeftOf to RightOf. Is that what you meant? Or did > you want to plug the monitors into each others' plugs? In which case > >Section "Screen" > > Identifier "Screen0" > > Device "Card0" > > Monitor"Monitor

Re: [gentoo-user] postfix - how to test

2007-06-06 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:13:09 -0500 Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > running: > > > > > > nc localhost smtp > > > > > > allows me to send mail so I guess I'm good > > > > Hm, better test if it allows other people to do the same -- if it can > > be reached via the internet or pot

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Dale
Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > On 6/5/07, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Kevin O'Gorman wrote: >> > I had firestarter-1.0.3 emerged for quite some time. I hadn't really >> > used it, but I'm a bit surprised now to find that it's interfering >> > with normal emerges because it's got a big red "M" smac

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Dan Farrell
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:42:59 +0300 Aleksey Kunitskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "Layout 1" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > Screen 1 "Screen1" LeftOf "Screen0" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > InputDevice "Mo

[gentoo-user] Changing primary monitor on dual-monitor X.org setup

2007-06-06 Thread Aleksey Kunitskiy
Hi Gentoo community, I'm new to dual-monitor setups and I have one question to you: I have Geforce 7950GT graphics card with two independent DVI-I outputs and two monitors connected to each DVI out. I configured X.org to use two screens separate on these two monitors. Question: How can I interch

[gentoo-user] Updating eix bombs

2007-06-06 Thread John J. Foster
Yesterday morning while updating world I got the following errors during the emerge of app-portage/eix: i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -O2 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -o update-eix update-eix.o varsreader.o global.o setmask.o database/libdatabase.a portage/libportage.a portage/conf/libporta

Re: [gentoo-user] postfix - how to test

2007-06-06 Thread Dan Farrell
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:14:14 +0200 Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:19:26 +0200 Johannes Skov Frandsen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > running: > > > > nc localhost smtp > > > > allows me to send mail so I guess I'm good > > Hm, better test if i

Re: [gentoo-user] Install Using another System

2007-06-06 Thread Dan Farrell
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:55:35 -0400 Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dan Farrell wrote: > > Sounds like a fun project. Have you considered trying to get it to > > run without a har drive at all? I bet a server could provide NFS > > man

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups blockers . . .

2007-06-06 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 15:49, Naga wrote: > On Wednesday 06 June 2007 16:25:51 Mick wrote: > > # emerge -C net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds-20070501 > > > > --- Couldn't find 'net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds-20070501' to unmerge. > > Is this the version you have? That's the version that I had be

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups blockers . . .

2007-06-06 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 15:41, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > On Wednesday 06 June 2007 16:25:51 Mick wrote: > > # emerge -uDv world > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > ... done! > > [ebuild U ] net-print/cups-1.2.10-r1 [1.2.9] USE="X dbus jpeg ldap > > nls pam png

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups blockers . . .

2007-06-06 Thread Naga
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 16:25:51 Mick wrote: > # emerge -C net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds-20070501 > > --- Couldn't find 'net-print/foomatic-filters-ppds-20070501' to unmerge. Is this the version you have? -- Naga -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Cups blockers . . .

2007-06-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 16:25:51 Mick wrote: > # emerge -uDv world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > ... done! > [ebuild U ] net-print/cups-1.2.10-r1 [1.2.9] USE="X dbus jpeg ldap nls > pam png ppds ssl tiff -php -samba -slp" 0 kB > [ebuild U ] media-gfx/xsane-0

[gentoo-user] Cups blockers . . .

2007-06-06 Thread Mick
Hi guys, Did you get this: === # emerge -uDv world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: ... done! [ebuild U ] net-print/cups-1.2.10-r1 [1.2.9] USE="X dbus jpeg ldap nls pam png ppds ssl tiff -php -samba -slp" 0 kB [ebuild U ] media-gfx/x

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Dave Jones
Jorge Almeida wrote on 06/06/07 15:59: >> That helps some, but in net-firewall I'm finding a lot of unstable >> packages, and no really good idea which ones will be the best for a >> personal firewall, let alone which ones are best supported upstream so >> this doesn't happen to me again. So I'm i

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread John J. Foster
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:35:18AM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > That helps some, but in net-firewall I'm finding a lot of unstable > packages, and no really good idea which ones will be the best for a > personal firewall, let alone which ones are best supported upstream so > this doesn't h

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Ken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > On 6/5/07, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > That helps some, but in net-firewall I'm finding a lot of unstable > packages, and no really good idea which ones will be the best for a > personal firewa

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: That helps some, but in net-firewall I'm finding a lot of unstable packages, and no really good idea which ones will be the best for a personal firewall, let alone which ones are best supported upstream so this doesn't happen to me again. So I'm intere

Re: [gentoo-user] Revdep won't rebuild gphoto2-2.1.5

2007-06-06 Thread Roman Zimmermann
Am Mittwoch 06 Juni 2007 15:24 schrieb Kevin O'Gorman: > I've got gphoto2-2.2.0 emerged, but revdep-rebuild keeps trying and > failing to emerge > gphoto2-2.1.5. I don't know why it even tries. > > equery depends ghpoto2 > shows nothing, and gphoto2 does not appear in my world file > (libgphoto2

Re: [gentoo-user] Revdep won't rebuild gphoto2-2.1.5

2007-06-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > I've got gphoto2-2.2.0 emerged, but revdep-rebuild keeps trying and > failing to emerge > gphoto2-2.1.5. I don't know why it even tries. > > equery depends ghpoto2 > shows nothing, and gphoto2 does not appear in my world file > (libgphoto2 does,

Re: [gentoo-user] Revdep won't rebuild gphoto2-2.1.5

2007-06-06 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2007 schrieb ext Kevin O'Gorman: > I've got gphoto2-2.2.0 emerged, but revdep-rebuild keeps trying and > failing to emerge > gphoto2-2.1.5. I don't know why it even tries. Hmm, usually revdep-rebuild re-installs the exact same version as is installed, unless -X is used. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On 6/5/07, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > I had firestarter-1.0.3 emerged for quite some time. I hadn't really > used it, but I'm a bit surprised now to find that it's interfering > with normal emerges because it's got a big red "M" smacked on it. > > I suppose that mean

[gentoo-user] Revdep won't rebuild gphoto2-2.1.5

2007-06-06 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
I've got gphoto2-2.2.0 emerged, but revdep-rebuild keeps trying and failing to emerge gphoto2-2.1.5. I don't know why it even tries. equery depends ghpoto2 shows nothing, and gphoto2 does not appear in my world file (libgphoto2 does, however). What should I do to debug this? I'm not that inte

Re: [gentoo-user] postfix - how to test

2007-06-06 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:19:26 +0200 Johannes Skov Frandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > running: > > nc localhost smtp > > allows me to send mail so I guess I'm good Hm, better test if it allows other people to do the same -- if it can be reached via the internet or potentially harmful oth

Re: [gentoo-user] postfix - how to test

2007-06-06 Thread Johannes Skov Frandsen
Dan Farrell wrote: > > Postfix on my boxes logs to /var/log/mail.err and /var/log/mail.log. > > Why not attach your main.cf to the next message, and I'll take a look > at it? > I found the mentioned folders and it appears the same is the case on my machine. This configuration seems to work (a

Re: [gentoo-user] Wha' hoppen to firestarter?

2007-06-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > I had firestarter-1.0.3 emerged for quite some time. I hadn't really > used it, but I'm a bit surprised now to find that it's interfering > with normal emerges because it's got a big red "M" smacked on it. > > I suppose that means there's a proble

[gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180935 > > Again the old philosophy "what I don't understand is invalid". > > Obviously my contributions are unwelcomed, so I closed the bug. Yep, Jakub often has a quite jerky "tone". So do a lot of the Gentoo d