[gentoo-user] Re: MSSQL command line Linux interface

2007-04-09 Thread Michael Mauch
Mauro Faccenda wrote: > I need to do some simple tasks in a MSSQL Server from a Linux that have no X > installed. I know I can tunnel a SSH connection and run any MSSQL in my own > box, but I think it's more practical to have a cli gui for MSSQL, but I > couldn't find one googling for it, so I'

Re: [gentoo-user] MSSQL command line Linux interface

2007-04-09 Thread Elias Probst
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 18:56:34 Mauro Faccenda wrote: > Hi all, > > I need to do some simple tasks in a MSSQL Server from a Linux that have no > X installed. I know I can tunnel a SSH connection and run any MSSQL in my > own box, but I think it's more practical to have a cli gui for MSSQL, but I

Re: [gentoo-user] MSSQL command line Linux interface

2007-04-09 Thread Mick
On Monday 09 April 2007 17:56, Mauro Faccenda wrote: > Hi all, > > I need to do some simple tasks in a MSSQL Server from a Linux that have no > X installed. I know I can tunnel a SSH connection and run any MSSQL in my > own box, but I think it's more practical to have a cli gui for MSSQL, but I > c

[gentoo-user] MSSQL command line Linux interface

2007-04-09 Thread Mauro Faccenda
Hi all, I need to do some simple tasks in a MSSQL Server from a Linux that have no X installed. I know I can tunnel a SSH connection and run any MSSQL in my own box, but I think it's more practical to have a cli gui for MSSQL, but I couldn't find one googling for it, so I'm here asking you. Fo

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Why are gentoo people so in love with colorized output?!?

2007-04-09 Thread Dan Farrell
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:49:20 -0400 Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Hello Dan Farrell, > > > >> Why this is the case, I don't think I'll ever understand. White > >> terminal backgrounds, aside from the invisible color problem, also > >> are hella ugly. > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Why are gentoo people so in love with colorized output?!?

2007-04-09 Thread Dan Farrell
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 19:25:03 -0400 David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:56:21 +0100 > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > Hello Dan Farrell, > > > > > Unfortunately, everything above syl.claws 2.4 is masked testing on > > > x86_64, and I don't want to get my hands dirty on this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

2007-04-09 Thread Francisco Rivas
Hi all :D I think what "-march=your_arch -O2" it's enough, because -O3 it's highest but have some details (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS#-O2_or_-O3.3F). My guess is "-march=your_arch -O2". I was compiled my entire system with those flags and my applications no matter which have a very good functi

[gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

2007-04-09 Thread Alexander Skwar
ยท maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > One suggests using -O3 -pipe, the other, -O2 without > the pipe. The resulting binaries of a -O2 -pipe compile will be the same as those of a -O2 (no pipe) compile. See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Overall-Options.html#index-pipe-81 > How m

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 "

2007-04-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
Hello Andrey Gerasimenko, > Ideally you should measure compile times for large projects like Open > Office and find out what works best on your system. I would start with > 1 thread -O2 and -pipe. That would be an incredible waste of time because the OOo build replaces any -O? CFLAG with -O2. I