On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Walter Dnes wrote:
> If you want loopback devices to "just work", they should be
> compiled into the kernel, like so...
>
> make menuconfig
> Device Drivers --->
> Block devices --->
> <*> Loopback device support
>
> My guess is that somewhere along the line, th
Ivan Lucian Aron wrote:
> I turned off Preempt Big Kernel Lock earlier today, and haven't had a
> deadlock/crash since.
> Apparently that solved it.. thanks for the help/support
I have an AMD Athlon 64X2 4200+ and Have the "Preempt Big Kernel Lock"
turned on in my 2.6.19 kernel and have experience
On 2/20/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 03:47:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks for responding. I didn't know about that option or the
> difference between how it's used for --depclean. Thanks.
>
> I solved the lm_sensors one before your response came
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 13:43:08 Konstantin Budylov wrote:
> This error appears in my Xorg.0.log at boot time:
> >(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed
> >(/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file:
> > No such file ordirectory)
> >(EE) A
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 03:47:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks for responding. I didn't know about that option or the
> difference between how it's used for --depclean. Thanks.
>
> I solved the lm_sensors one before your response came back.
> Unfortunately --with-bdeps=y doesn't seem to iden
On 2/20/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:04:12 Mark Knecht wrote:
> I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
> machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
> things are cool but then --depclean complains
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:37:44AM +0100, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote
> Well, yes, it may be faster a bit, like 1%, maybe 10%??? But if one distro
> would be unbearable slow, gentoo would be too. It won't just be faster
> 10 times, and yes, that 10% are nice, but not usually worth switching
> your
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:04:12 Mark Knecht wrote:
> I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
> machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
> things are cool but then --depclean complains about needing
> virtual/glibc and using emerge depends sugg
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:35:13PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> Hi all,
>
> Kernel 2.6.20-gentoo
>
> My various /dev/loop/* devices used to always JustWork, until a recent
> update. Unfortunately I can't tell when the breakage happened.
>
> Right now what happens is I don't get these devices au
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:13:36AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> Rconfigure and recompile the kernel:
>
> make menuconfig -> Device Drivers -> Character Devices -> Direct
> Rendering Manager
>
> make it a module. Or, you can just deselect it as the ati drivers
> provide their own drm implementa
Hi,
I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
things are cool but then --depclean complains about needing
virtual/glibc and using emerge depends suggests it really is needed
but eix glibc doesn't show anythin
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Hans-Stefan Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] HP Cluster on Gentoo':
> Hallo,
>
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
> > On Monday 19 February 2007 02:47, Hans-Stefan Bauer wrote:
> >> storm1 hsbauer # /etc/init.d/gfs start
> >> * Starting gfs clus
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
given that it's list aimed at providing help to all users.
Sorry - should read:
given that it's *a* list aimed at providing help to all users.
(I'm hoping for a grammar checker in Thunderbird)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
James wrote:
Besides, Gentoo's greatest strength is
the help the community provides to one another.
+1
I think the friendly, helpful attitude of the list is exactly as it
should be - given that it's list aimed at providing help to all users.
It would be ok to be a bit rougher on a 'gento
On Monday 19 February 2007 02:47:03 Hans-Stefan Bauer wrote:
> * Loading lock_dlm kernel module ...
> FATAL: Error inserting lock_dlm (/fs/gfs_locking/lock_dlm/lock_dlm.ko):
> Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)
> * Failed to load lock_dlm kernel
> module
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0500, Henk Boom wrote:
> Hi, I have just done an emerge -uDNav world, and when I hibernate
> (suspend2) with the 'hibernate' script, it no longer displays the
> progress bar showing how long it will take to finish. I am using
> suspend2-sources-2.6.17-r6,
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:46 +, James wrote:
> Dear Pompous Jerks:
[...]
> Does anyone believe in civility any more?
My apologies. And thanks for setting a standard that we all may follow.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi, I have just done an emerge -uDNav world, and when I hibernate
(suspend2) with the 'hibernate' script, it no longer displays the
progress bar showing how long it will take to finish. I am using
suspend2-sources-2.6.17-r6, and I have not re-compiled my kernel since
the emerge. Its sources are st
James,
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 15:46, James wrote:
> Peter Lewis letterboxes.org> writes:
> > No, I didn't mean it as a criticism anyway. I just find that it helps to
> > assume the best on mailing lists. It all helps for a happy community.
>
> Dear Pompous Jerks:
Are you including me in tha
On 2007-02-20, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neither the ati-drivers version nor kernel has changed.
Bzzt, wrong!
The ati-drivers package was updated from 8.27.10-r1 to 8.32.5.
Rolling it back to 8.27.10-r1 made xv work again. The lock up
occurred with xorg-xserver versions 1.1.1
After an update a coule days ago, any attempt to use the XV
extension (xine, mplayer, etc.) locks up the X server hard
(100% CPU usage). Until the update a couple days ago XV had
worked with no problems for about 14 months on this machine.
I've rolled xorg-server back to 1.1.1-r1, but that didn't
Hallo,
Hans-Werner Hilse schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:33:32 +0100 Hans-Stefan Bauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Merging sys-cluster/dlm-kernel-1.03.00 to /
--- /cluster/
>>> /cluster/dlm.ko
Hm. What does "uname -r" say on your system?
What's /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/sour
Peter Lewis letterboxes.org> writes:
> No, I didn't mean it as a criticism anyway. I just find that it helps to
> assume the best on mailing lists. It all helps for a happy community.
Dear Pompous Jerks:
The arrogance of these responses is astounding. Does anyone believe
in civility any more?
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:33:32 +0100 Hans-Stefan Bauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Merging sys-cluster/dlm-kernel-1.03.00 to /
> --- /cluster/
> >>> /cluster/dlm.ko
Hm. What does "uname -r" say on your system?
What's /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/source linked to? Valid kernel location?
-hw
Peter Ruskin wrote:
> No, it doesn't look familiar - I had no problems at all
I wonder... Could you please check your kernel configuration?
/usr/src/linux-2.6.20-gentoo # grep CONFIG_SECURITY .config
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM=y
CONFIG_SECU
On 2007-02-20, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 19:36:35 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> * You need to set cblas to atlas or reference. Do:
>> *eselect cblas set
>> * where is atlas, threaded-atlas or reference
>>
>>!!! ERROR: dev-python/nump
Hallo,
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
On Monday 19 February 2007 02:47, Hans-Stefan Bauer wrote:
storm1 hsbauer # /etc/init.d/gfs start
* Starting gfs cluster:
* Loading lock_dlm kernel module ...
FATAL: Error inserting lock_dlm (/fs/gfs_locking/lock_dlm/lock_dlm.ko):
Unknown symbol in mo
On 19 Feb 2007, at 23:15, Mick wrote:
...
You don't state which model of Belkin you tried, but I can assure you
that they do a "set" (USB, cardbus, PCI) of 802.11g cards that are
excellently supported by the rt2500 drivers. These are excellent, are
OSS & you can get them with `emerge rt2500`.
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 22:09 +1100, Ric de France wrote:
Hossa.
> It's just that I'm having a hard time from figuring out which USE
> flags (if any) to remove to get rid of evolution...
>
> Any suggestions?
You could use gnome-base/gnome-light, which is basically (quote from the
ebuild):
"# Thi
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 11:44, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:27:09 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Hm. It sounded like he was lazy to do a research work. I have to
> > confess it didn't even cross my head that OP just wanted a
> > recommendation on available router distros. In
Bo Ørsted Andresen írta:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 22:40:32 Gyuszk wrote:
>
>> As this email is clear text, I cannot mark, but from the USE flags, it
>> is obvious that Portage now considers all my USE flag demands, although
>> emerge -pvN world don't. That is what I don't understand.
>>
>> I put evolution in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided.
>>
>> Then portage assumes, that it is installed ba hand and therefor it's not
>> installed installed automatically.
>>
>> Unfortunatly, you still have to install eveolution-data-server and
>> evolution-webcal, because it's a hard-depende
On Monday 19 February 2007 19:36:35 Grant Edwards wrote:
> * You need to set cblas to atlas or reference. Do:
> *eselect cblas set
> * where is atlas, threaded-atlas or reference
>
>!!! ERROR: dev-python/numpy-1.0.1-r1 failed.
>Call stack:
> ebuild.sh, line 1614: Ca
> I changed /etc/conf.d/keymap to:
>
> KEYMAP="es"
>
> and rebooted but the keymap behavior doesn't seem to have
> changed.
The keymap where? The keymap on the console should be es after the
above change. To change it in X too, use Option "XkbLayout" "es" in
xorg.conf, or set it with 'setxkbmap
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 03:23 -0600, Dale wrote:
> That I can understand. I sometimes want someone to tell me something
> good to use so I can get a unbiased opinion.
Yeah except a) opinions *are* biased and b) one's opinion was never
asked and c) I've observed that asking a bunch of strangers for
Hi ;)
This error appears in my Xorg.0.log at boot time:
>(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed
>(/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file:
> No such file ordirectory)
>(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
And It seems that 3D ren
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Sean wrote:
> Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> Any suggestions?
> >
> > I put evolution in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided.
> >
> > Then portage assumes, that it is installed ba hand and therefor
> > it's not installed installed automatically.
> >
> > Unfortunatly, you sti
Sven Köhler wrote:
Any suggestions?
I put evolution in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided.
Then portage assumes, that it is installed ba hand and therefor it's not
installed installed automatically.
Unfortunatly, you still have to install eveolution-data-server and
evolution-webcal, becaus
> Any suggestions?
I put evolution in /etc/portage/profile/package.provided.
Then portage assumes, that it is installed ba hand and therefor it's not
installed installed automatically.
Unfortunatly, you still have to install eveolution-data-server and
evolution-webcal, because it's a hard-depend
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:27:09 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Hm. It sounded like he was lazy to do a research work. I have to
> confess it didn't even cross my head that OP just wanted a
> recommendation on available router distros. In that case, I feel very
> sorry.
Don't be too hard on yourself,
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Ric de France wrote:
> Hi list(s),
>
> I was looking through the dynamic USE flag page (
> http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml ), and noticed there were
> some flags that brought in evolution support... but after realising I
> don't used evolution (as I am happy wit
Peter Lewis wrote:
> Or maybe they actually wanted a recommendation from someone rather than
> just picking something off the shelf based on how good its website was.
Hm. It sounded like he was lazy to do a research work. I have to confess it
didn't even cross my head that OP just wanted a recomm
Hi list(s),
I was looking through the dynamic USE flag page (
http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml ), and noticed there were some
flags that brought in evolution support... but after realising I don't
used evolution (as I am happy with thunderbird), I was wondering how
to remove evolution from
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:42:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 1. It's an orphan, left over from an unmerge that wasn't fully
> successful. if you don't need them, delete them.
> 2. A package was installed, and it created it's own binaries for it's
> own use. Portage didn't put them there so doesn't
Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:48, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:46 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>>
>>> Mikie wrote:
>>>
Anyone out there know where I could DL an iso file with a simple
>>> route
>>>
>>>
only l
Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:05:26AM -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> I have to disagree with this. I used to use Mandrake and Gentoo is a
>> *LOT* faster than Mandrake. I turned off a lot of unused services and
>> Mandrake was still pretty slow. This is especia
Grant wrote:
My girlfriend is from Spain as is her laptop and many of the keys I
press don't coincide with the characters printed on the screen. I
changed /etc/conf.d/keymap to:
KEYMAP="es"
and rebooted but the keymap behavior doesn't seem to have changed.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
-
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:05:26AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> I have to disagree with this. I used to use Mandrake and Gentoo is a
> *LOT* faster than Mandrake. I turned off a lot of unused services and
> Mandrake was still pretty slow. This is especially true if you
> customize all the flags
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:48, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 19:46 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> > Mikie wrote:
> > > Anyone out there know where I could DL an iso file with a simple
> >
> > route
> >
> > > only linux?
> >
> > Is _really_ that hard to use Google?
>
> Maybe they
On Tuesday 20 February 2007, Dale wrote:
> > Use the Live CD if you want to get a working machine quickly. If
> > watching gcc output scroll off the screen turns you on (it does for
> > most of us around here) then use the minimal by all means.
> >
>
> This is true. Gentoo updates pretty fas
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, but that's never a good reason for using Gentoo. If a binary
> distro compiles every option under the sun then the software will still
> work, but the binaries might be a bit big. Compiling on your machine
> gives no discernable performance benefit for the avera
51 matches
Mail list logo
