-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I gave a sync 2 days ago and my world update had that output:
# emerge -upvD world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies |
!!! Ebuilds for the following packages are either all
!!! masked or don't
On Friday 16 February 2007 02:00:26 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 00:44:16 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2007 01:33:00 b.n. wrote:
> > > >> 2) I still have to upgrade dbus to 1.0.2
> > > >> BEFORE: the dbus upgrade was in the -pv output
> > > >> AFTER:
On Friday 16 February 2007 00:44:16 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 01:33:00 b.n. wrote:
> > >> 2) I still have to upgrade dbus to 1.0.2
> > >> BEFORE: the dbus upgrade was in the -pv output
> > >> AFTER: It seems the dbus upgrade is no more in emerge -pv world.
> > >
> > > T
On Friday 16 February 2007 01:33:00 b.n. wrote:
> >> 2) I still have to upgrade dbus to 1.0.2
> >> BEFORE: the dbus upgrade was in the -pv output
> >> AFTER: It seems the dbus upgrade is no more in emerge -pv world.
> >
> > This seems weird. What's the output of `emerge -pv dbus` with portage
> > 2
On Thursday 15 February 2007 19:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
> When you hit reply the message will contains headers that
> indicate what message it's a reply to. Real mail/news programs
> use that header information to sort messages into threads.
I've just turned threads on in my mail client and I se
Bo Ørsted Andresen ha scritto:
>> 1) I had a lot of sound-related packages that are no more in portage
>> still installed. Okay, I should get rid of them.
>> BEFORE: emerge -pv warned me of all these packages.
>> AFTER: emerge -pv warns me of only one package (djplay)
>
> Due to bug #48195 [1] bei
On Friday 16 February 2007 01:09:30 b.n. wrote:
> > In portage-2.1.2, installation actions do not necessarily pull in build
> > time dependencies that are not strictly required. This behavior is
> > adjustable via the new --with-bdeps option that is documented in the
> > emerge(1) man page. For mo
Etaoin Shrdlu ha scritto:
> My guess is that at least one of your issues has something to do with the
> new portage behavior regarding buid time dependencies. This is the
> relevant message displayed when upgrading:
>
> In portage-2.1.2, installation actions do not necessarily pull in build
>
Grant Edwards ha scritto:
> On 2007-02-15, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I hope so. In the past I was always baffled when my searches
>>> didn't find anything relevent but all the bugs I reported were
>>> duplicates. [Actually, I think there was one what wasn't, but
>>> the experience wa
On Thursday 15 February 2007 23:21:02 b.n. wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently upgraded Portage (and a couple of other unrelated packages).
> After the upgrade, I noticed that "emerge -pv world" before and after
> give two very different results. In particular:
>
> 1) I had a lot of sound-related packages th
On Thursday 15 February 2007 23:21, b.n. wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently upgraded Portage (and a couple of other unrelated
> packages). After the upgrade, I noticed that "emerge -pv world" before
> and after give two very different results. In particular:
>
> 1) I had a lot of sound-related packages tha
On 2007-02-15, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I hope so. In the past I was always baffled when my searches
>> didn't find anything relevent but all the bugs I reported were
>> duplicates. [Actually, I think there was one what wasn't, but
>> the experience was enough to make me swear off repo
> I hope so. In the past I was always baffled when my searches
> didn't find anything relevent but all the bugs I reported were
> duplicates. [Actually, I think there was one what wasn't, but
> the experience was enough to make me swear off reporting bugs.]
I think there is nothing bad in this.
Hi,
I recently upgraded Portage (and a couple of other unrelated packages).
After the upgrade, I noticed that "emerge -pv world" before and after
give two very different results. In particular:
1) I had a lot of sound-related packages that are no more in portage
still installed. Okay, I should get
Grant Edwards ha scritto:
> I'll probably just do a clean reinstall at that point. When I
> switched gcc from 3.2 to 3.3, it would have been a lot less
> work to just re-install from scratch.
My personal experience is that it is no more such a bad hassle. For
upgrading to gcc 4.1.x you have to r
Michael Crute ha scritto:
>> You should use ps, top and free of course! Just realize that they lie...
>
> Seeing this thread reminded me of a blog article I saw on Virtual
> Threads a while back...
> http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html
>
>
> He doe
On Thursday 08 February 2007 21:45, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:34:21 -0800
>
> "Michael Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, list --
> >
> >
> > # df -h
> > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/hda3 20G 12G 7.5G 61% /
> > udev
On 2007-02-15, Peter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:20, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> In the future please create a new thread by choosing new mail rather than
>> replying to another thread and changing the subject...
>
> Sorry... I didn't know there was a differe
On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:32, John Blinka wrote:
> Following a suggestion on this list, here's what I did to correct this
> problem:
>
> Use your favorite text editor to correct the "dependency_libs" line
> in each of these files. Each line starts with something like
> dependency_libs=' /usr
On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:20, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> In the future please create a new thread by choosing new mail rather than
> replying to another thread and changing the subject...
Sorry... I didn't know there was a difference.
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728#c29
M
Peter Lewis wrote:
Hi all,
I've just run revdep-rebuild, after "updating world", and it rebuilt
gcc-4.1.1-r3, due to the following libraries:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgcjawt.la
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgij.la
Once it finished, I ran revdep-rebuild once again, ju
On Thursday 15 February 2007 18:37:22 Peter Lewis wrote:
> I've just run revdep-rebuild, after "updating world", and it rebuilt
> gcc-4.1.1-r3, due to the following libraries:
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgcjawt.la
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgij.la
>
> Once it finished
On Thursday 15 February 2007 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You have to fix some paths in the two mentioned files. I can't remember if
> it's both files or just one of them. But at least in one of the files the
> paths are wrong. Check bugs.gentoo.org to find more.
Will do... Thanks!
Pete.
--
FuziOK wrote:
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
Roman Naumann wrote:
Hi,
does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot
scroll to
the beginning of th
Old bug.
You have to fix some paths in the two mentioned files. I can't remember if it's
both files or just one of them. But at least in one of the files the paths are
wrong. Check bugs.gentoo.org to find more.
I've had 'em too ;)
Kristian Poul Herkild
-Original Message-
From: Peter L
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
Roman Naumann wrote:
Hi,
does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot
scroll to
the beginning of the text quite of
Roman Naumann wrote:
Hi,
does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot scroll to
the beginning of the text quite often, because the history bu
Roman Naumann 写道:
> Hi,
>
> does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
> terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
> I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot scroll to
> the beginning of the text quite often, because the hist
On 2/15/07, Roman Naumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot scroll to
the beginning of the text qui
Hi,
does someone know, how to increase the "history-buffer's size" of the
terminal? (and I mean the pure terminal, without an X-Server)
I mean, if I use some commands producing plenty of output, I cannot scroll to
the beginning of the text quite often, because the history buffer is to
small.
Anot
On 2/15/07, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, brullo nulla wrote:
> > Most likely you only looked at user cpu % and neglected to list the
> > system and niced times as well.
> >
> > p.s. golden rule: ps lies. top lies. free lies.
> > Don't believe the reading
Thanks a lot it was very helpfull :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Hi guys, i have a web server with IP based virtual hosts (3-4) and i
>> want to make a ftp account for every host. I'm thinking to use proftpd
>> and to make the root dir in /var/www so then every user will have home
>>
Hi,
> Hi guys, i have a web server with IP based virtual hosts (3-4) and i
> want to make a ftp account for every host. I'm thinking to use proftpd
> and to make the root dir in /var/www so then every user will have home
> directory to different web account (/var/www/domain1, /var/www/domain2,
> e
33 matches
Mail list logo
