It appears that the realplayer binary still requires libstdc++.so.5 which
is provided by libstdc++-v3-3.3.4. So despite the fact that this library
may not be needed for recompiled c++ apps, binary ones like this may still
require the old library :(
ldd realplay.bin
...
libstdc++.so.5 => not found
Colleen Beamer wrote:
> Okay, I give. I'm having a problem with configuring xorg.
>
> I *do* have a basic configuration, but can't run some applications in
> full screen mode and I surmise this is because something isn't set
> properly in xorg.conf I ran Xorg -configure and it did give me a basic
Hi Neil,
> > # ls -l /dev/vg /dev/mapper
> > ls: /dev/vg: no such file or directory
> > /dev/mapper:
> > total 0
> > crw-rw 1 root root control
> >
> > # ls -l /dev | grep vg
> > no printout
> >
> > # vgchange -a y
> > -bash: vgchange: command not found
>
> That's because you haven't i
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 10:13 -0700, kashani wrote:
> Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
>
> > Cool -- that makes life very good indeed -- as far as I know the driver
> > configurations are essentially identical so that out to be easy -- the
> > processors are identical
>
> I've got two sets of hardware, one
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:18 +, James wrote:
> Rumen Yotov qrypto.org> writes:
>
>
> > > > I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc,
>
> > Hi James,
> > Did you tried passing some ON/OFF options when booting with
> > install-minimal-2006.1 (i mean "gentoo acpi=off d
Grant wrote:
One thing that comes to mind is that the Tualatin P3-1.26 is a server
cpu and does not work in many desktop boards (I have *heard* that it
requires motherboard/memory ECC). If you've done the checking, and the
board is suitable then cool.
It sounds like you're talking about the Pen
Okay, I give. I'm having a problem with configuring xorg.
I *do* have a basic configuration, but can't run some applications in
full screen mode and I surmise this is because something isn't set
properly in xorg.conf I ran Xorg -configure and it did give me a basic
configuration, but the file is
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Saturday 09 September 2006 05:33, Dale wrote:
>
>> What would be a good way of finding files that were not deleted when
>> something was upgraded/unmerged? I thought depclean was different from
>> what I wanted to say but it got the ball rolling.
>>
>
> Depcl
On Saturday 09 September 2006 05:33, Dale wrote:
> What would be a good way of finding files that were not deleted when
> something was upgraded/unmerged? I thought depclean was different from
> what I wanted to say but it got the ball rolling.
Depclean is to remove packages that are no longer in
One thing that comes to mind is that the Tualatin P3-1.26 is a server
cpu and does not work in many desktop boards (I have *heard* that it
requires motherboard/memory ECC). If you've done the checking, and the
board is suitable then cool.
It sounds like you're talking about the Pentium III-S. A
When installing samba from portage one ends up with a smbusers file in
/etc/samba that contains (in part):
root = administrator admin
Which would seem to indicate that windows user administrator or admin
will be mapped to root on the linux shares.
I wanted to extend that to my win user harry. I
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> I'm working on the list above. So far nothing belongs to anything.
>> Maybe I need a depclean on this thing. It is a 3 year old install if I
>> recall correctly.
>>
>
> This has nothing to do with depclean. Neils suggesting that the md5sums were
> altered by fix
On Saturday 09 September 2006 06:24, b.n. wrote:
> >>> Calculating world dependencies \
> >>> !!! Ebuilds for the following packages are either all
> >>> !!! masked or don't exist:
> >>> net-im/aim
> >
> > You really should do something when you see warnings like this.
> > net-im/aim was masked for
darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Dale:
>
>> Plus some of us like to read them. ;-)
>>
>
> Really...
>
> I do not see a problem if folks post here as long as they understand they
> should CC the OP if they want their responses considered for whatever it is
> the OP is doing...which I might
Unlike many linux users I started with linux and had to learn windows
later. In both cases I was already an `old man'. On my fiftieth
birthday in 1996, I started with Redhat linux somewhere in the 3X
version area.
I stumbled and plunged, plunged and stumbled all the way up to now.
And here 10 yr
quoth the b.n.:
> darren kirby wrote:
> > I do not see a problem if folks post here as long as they understand they
> > should CC the OP if they want their responses considered for whatever it
> > is the OP is doing...which I might add, would be nice to know.
>
> I don't want to sound unpolite, but
On Saturday 09 September 2006 04:25, Dale wrote:
> Yea, I know about aim being gone. My wife uses this once in a blue moon
> and she !HAS! to have aim.
Well, if you don't care about that it is no longer supported you can always
download the ebuild from cvs [1] or copy it from /var/db/pkg/net-im/
darren kirby wrote:
I do not see a problem if folks post here as long as they understand they
should CC the OP if they want their responses considered for whatever it is
the OP is doing...which I might add, would be nice to know.
I don't want to sound unpolite, but the OP could more easily fo
On 9/8/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So basically if these files don't belong to anything, I can safely
delete them?
Yep.
On the roach report, me sort of chicken to edit those files. Will it be
OK to let it stay like this and let the bug get fixed? It's been doing
this a while and I d
On 9/8/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I did my emerge --sync andthen did a emerge -uvDp world. This is what I
got:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world
Add --tree to see what is pulling in the new packages.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # equery depends xplsprinters
> [ Searching for
On Saturday 09 September 2006 03:53, Dale wrote:
> I did my emerge --sync andthen did a emerge -uvDp world. This is what I
> got:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world
Add --tree to this command in order to see what is pulling it in.
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in o
quoth the Dale:
> b.n. wrote:
> >> All responses off list please.
> >>
> >> Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to
> >> them. :-)
> >
> > It's even more common sense not to ask for off-list answers to a
> > on-list post...
> >
> > m.
>
> Plus some of us like to read
Hi
I did my emerge --sync andthen did a emerge -uvDp world. This is what I
got:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies \
> !!! Ebuilds for the following packages are either all
> !!! masked or don't
b.n. wrote:
>>
>> All responses off list please.
>>
>> Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to
>> them. :-)
>
> It's even more common sense not to ask for off-list answers to a
> on-list post...
>
> m.
Plus some of us like to read them. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gen
Zac Slade volumehost.net> writes:
> Well what's the workload? Random reads, sequential reads, random writes,
> sequential writes? All these are important to selecting the best method of
> getting optimal I/O. There is no one perfect filesystem/raid level for
> everything.
Hello Zac,
A li
All responses off list please.
Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to
them. :-)
It's even more common sense not to ask for off-list answers to a on-list
post...
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/7/06, Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All responses off list please. Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to them. :-)-- David Granthttp://www.davidgrant.ca
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:43, James wrote:
> If I want maximum/optimized IO performance
> from these drives what is the best file system
> to use and drive configuration. (1/2) the swap space
> on each drive? Raid level? Other methods? EVMS(which
> I know nothing about)?
Well what's the worklo
-Original Message-
From: Colleen Beamer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why you use Gentoo
Chris White wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something
Hello,
I'm setting up a web server on a pII 400 MHz
system with a dual channel adaptec (ultra) scsi
controller. (2) ST-39173W Ultra SCSI Wide drives.
If I want maximum/optimized IO performance
from these drives what is the best file system
to use and drive configuration. (1/2) the swap space
on e
Michael Crute wrote:
Methinks there is just a bit of FUD swirling around. I can't speak to
GCC 4.1 (may do it this afternoon) but the last time I did a GCC
upgrade (following the documentation) I had absolutely no problems
whatsoever. If you are really worried tar up your system as a backup
bef
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 06:33:40PM -0500, Colleen Beamer wrote:
>
> I'm not, but I *could* be a grandmother, so I guess I'm not the average
>
Well, I *couldn't* be a grandmother, because I am a grandfather who has
pretty much no clue what average is.
festus
--
In all the millions of years dinos
Grant wrote:
I'm going to try a Tualatin P3-1.26 in my i810E motherboard. I did a
ton of research and I think my motherboard will support it. It comes
down to whether or not it's a revision B board. lspci -v just says
(rev 3). eBay has it for $31 shipped and guaranteed not DOA.
My main con
Chris White wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
> actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, you
> can put "community" or something if that's all you want. All responses off
> list please. Thanks.
[user]
I'm not, b
I can't figure out how to fix this one - NOT for lack of trying,
however.
I'm slowly trying to become more terminal-friendly and less
GUI-dependent. I also keep hearing how Emacs is so cool and powerful
and useful and blah. So I decided to try and learn it and see for
myself.
Installed it o
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:12:44 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 9/8/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I could be entirely wrong on this, but I upgraded from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 and
>> did not re-emerge system or world.
>>
>> Actually, with all due respect, it is unnecessary to recompile anything
>>
BTW, if you want to share your responses on-list, great, but you might
want to be sure to CC Chris as well, as he requested responses
off-list, indicating he may not read -user.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/8/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I could be entirely wrong on this, but I upgraded from 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 and
did not re-emerge system or world.
Actually, with all due respect, it is unnecessary to recompile anything
other than the programs which depend on libstdc++.
Yeah, I thought th
[user]I use and stay with Gentoo because it is the distro that I started with. I was used to windows before I used Gentoo, let alone linux. Once I got out of the windows way of thinking, then Gentoo and linux just kind of feel a bit natural. I've stayed with Gentoo because I haven't seen a good
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 16:14:53 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat.la)
> > broken /usr/lib/libqavm.la (requires /usr/lib/libaviplayavcodec.la)
> > broken /usr/lib/libqbanking.la (requires /usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
> > broken /usr/lib/libqba
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:36:57 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Why can't the ebuild be left on my
> machine in some location so that the machine remains unaltered until I
> decide it's worth dealing with?
The ebuild is on your machine, in /var/db/pkg/category/package-version/
Copy it to your overlay an
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:22:51 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
of course, I also did glibc!
--
Peter
+
Do not reply to this email, it is a spam trap and not monitored.
I can be reached via this list, or via
jabber: pete4abw at jabber.org
ICQ: 73676357
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 00:22:51 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Grant wrote:
>> > Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
>> > whole system?
>> No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
>> rest with
On 9/8/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Checking dynamic linking consistency...
> broken /usr/lib/aqbanking/plugins/0/bankinfo/de.la (requires
> /usr/lib/libaqbanking.la)
Since you don't have aqbanking installed anymore, just delete these
files, and probably the entire /usr/lib/qabanking
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Friday 08 September 2006 15:00, Dale wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
>> run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
>> before the gcc upgrade.
>>
>
> It is bug #125728 [1]? Otherwise if it continue
· Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm going from memory here, but when I had this error I recall to have solved
> it by rsynching and then remerging portage. YMMV.
Hi!
Thanks for helping!
To solve this issue, I removed the portage tree and ran
emerge-webrsync followed by a normal sync and all was
On 9/8/06, Shawn Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got portage updated, but when I went to run emerge -uD world I got the
following output:
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "sys-kernel/livecd-kernel".
(dependency required by "media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.11-r1" [ebuild])
Looks like your v
On 9/8/06, Shawn Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was trying to install PHP and a couple other packages when I got the
following error:
* Checking for required PHP feature(s) ...
* Discovered missing USE flag: unicode
*
* dev-lang/php-5.1.4-r6 needs to be re-installed with all of th
On 9/8/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/8/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sort of have a problem with this. Maybe the info is in the change
> logs?
Yes, you really should read the ChangeLog if you want anwers to such
questions. Looks like 4.1.21 was stabilized to
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a system that I apparently built using the wrong stage 3
Make.conf has chost as i386 but it's a Pentium 4 box
Im just about to start the emerge eav system
Should I wait and /or fix something b4 I proceed?
You'll need to resolve
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
>
>
> Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
> (Could take a couple
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:59, Grant wrote:
> My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100 memory as
> well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that speed now. I'll
> have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the Tualatin CPU,
In that case, you should buy as much 133MHz
> My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100
> memory as well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that
> speed now. I'll have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the
> Tualatin CPU, and I wonder how that will affect the PC-100
> memory. Would it be better to buy good Kings
On 9/8/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sort of have a problem with this. Maybe the info is in the change
logs?
Yes, you really should read the ChangeLog if you want anwers to such
questions. Looks like 4.1.21 was stabilized to solve a security bug
[1] [2].
up with 4.1.20 I thin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> Of Richard Fish
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
>
> On 9/8/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grant wrote:
> My main concern is the memory. My motherboad supports PC100
> memory as well as a 133fsb although it's not running at that
> speed now. I'll have to crank it up to 133fsb to support the
> Tualatin CPU, and I wonder how that will affect the PC-100
> memory. Would it be better to bu
On 9/8/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've followed the GCC upgrade guide before without problems, but now
I'm scared. Is all the trouble because of how Gentoo works or how GCC
works? What is the trouble like? Packages that won't compile, or
different things breaking in the system?
The
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
> Dale schrieb:
>
>> Marc Blumentritt wrote:
>> I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
>> run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
>> before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
>> su
On Friday 08 September 2006 15:00, Dale wrote:
> I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
> run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
> before the gcc upgrade.
It is bug #125728 [1]? Otherwise if it continues consider posting the output
of:
# revdep-re
Dale schrieb:
> Marc Blumentritt wrote:
> I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
> run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
> before the gcc upgrade. If you run it, you may want to post to make
> sure it is making sense. After three
Hey All,
I was trying to install PHP and a couple other packages when I got the following error:
* Checking for required PHP feature(s) ...
* Discovered missing USE flag: unicode
*
* dev-lang/php-5.1.4-r6 needs to be re-installed with all of the following
* USE flags enabled:
*
* pcre se
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:52, kashani wrote:
> Dan Johansson wrote:
> > After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with
> > SSL. Here is the error message from the startup:
> > Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
> > Cannot load /usr/lib/
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:07, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> > > The guide that I followed is:
> > >
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
> > >
> > > Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > > This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like the problem comes from the samba-3-gentoo-0.3.14.tar.bz2
> archive, which contains an entry for "./" dated from 2005-10-06. This
> causes the work directory to have that date when the archive is
> extracted, and confuses ebuild a bit because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
>
>
> Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
> (Could ta
> -Original Message-
> From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
>
> On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> > The gui
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> The guide that I followed is:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
>
> Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
> This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
> indicated -
Mark Knecht wrote:
lightning ~ # eix -I mysql
* dev-db/mysql
Available versions: !3.23.58-r1 4.0.25-r2 4.0.27 [M]4.1.21
[M]5.0.24-r1 [M]5.1.7_beta
Installed: 4.1.20
Homepage:http://www.mysql.com/
Description: A fast, multi-threaded, multi-user SQL
d
Hi!
All of a sudden, I get the following error when I run emerge:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc $ Gestoppt sudo emerge -C media-gfx/feh
Performing Global Updates: /Gentoo/Portage/tree/profiles/updates/2Q-2006
(Could take a couple of minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
.='update pass' *='
> -Original Message-
> From: kashani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:14 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Using a Stage 4 on similar hardware
>
> Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
>
> > Cool -- that makes life very good indeed -- as
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:29, Dan Johansson wrote:
> After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with
> SSL.
Did you follow those steps?
[portage] ebuild log for dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8c
WARN: postinst
You must re-compile all packages that are linked against
Open
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Cool -- that makes life very good indeed -- as far as I know the driver
configurations are essentially identical so that out to be easy -- the
processors are identical
I've got two sets of hardware, one has LSI scsi cards and e1000. The
other has SATA and tg3 network
Bo:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
The instructions specify to use Revdep-rebuild -- and I quote
If you upgrade from gcc 3.3 to 3.4, you have two possibilities on how to
upgrade your system.
Hi,
Portage wants to downgrade MySQL on my PC. This appears to be due
to a revision being removed from portage:
lightning ~ # emerge -pvDuN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
[ebuild UD] dev-db/mysql-4.0.27 [4.1.20] USE="b
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:12, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> Most of my problems came in the stage of the revdep-rebuild things
> simply wouldn't build. I finally solved it by un-installing as many of
> the offending packages as I could, multiple emerge --sync and about 10
> attempts at revdep-re
> -Original Message-
> From: kashani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:03 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Using a Stage 4 on similar hardware
>
> Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
> > How much hardware leeway is safe to accept when
Dan Johansson wrote:
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with SSL.
Here is the error message from the startup:
Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so into
server: /usr/lib/apache2/modules
User
I was attracted to Gentoo because it was different, and I'm attracted to
things like that.
Coming from a background of Slackware and Redhat, I fell in love with the ease
of portage
But I strongly believe one of the biggest strengths of Gentoo is this list. I
have learned more from reading
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with SSL.
Here is the error message from the startup:
Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/apache2/modules.d/40_mod_ssl.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so into
server: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_ssl.so: undefined
Rumen Yotov qrypto.org> writes:
> > > I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc,
> Hi James,
> Did you tried passing some ON/OFF options when booting with
> install-minimal-2006.1 (i mean "gentoo acpi=off doscsi etc.)
> HTH.Rumen
Hi Rumen,
I used gentoo-nofb for the k
I'm agree absolutely, I have switched to 4.1.1 already :-) Probably, it is
not a bad idea to add a note about this trap somewhere in the official guide.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 20:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to $DEI
[Rafael Barrera Oro] [User]
I entered the Linux world using SUSE, in time, it began to have
humongous circular dependencies problems which drove me crazy. When i
discover Gentoo, i found the portage system to be just what i was
waiting for, an outstanding feature.
Also:
Love the "G" that lo
Mark Shields gmail.com> writes:
> I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc,
so I can
make an ISO from the disc (I think it's a minimal install cd) and get
it to you
somehow.
-em
Yes, I think this is the best solution. That way it'll have profile
2006.1
gcc4.1+ and l
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to $DEITY, my mailer picked the tagline!
> It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
> not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
> this portage error.
Yes, I specified that it's
What change did you have to make to CHOST? 386 to 686? or something more
complicated?
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
For me, the problem was that I had to change CHOST...then I'll re-install
from scratch.
But I don't say Gentoo is bad, I say, I am bad at Gentoo !
On 9/8/06, Tim
Good one, Jean-Marc!
I hope my experience is better than yours. I'm in the middle of this process
on a live system, been building since Monday (it's an old 600MHz box)
If you can read this email, my system is still running
Michael
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
I would call th
For me, the problem was that I had to change CHOST...then I'll re-install from scratch.
But I don't say Gentoo is bad, I say, I am bad at Gentoo !
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-> From: Grant [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> Sent: Friday, September
It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
this portage error.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 18:59, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> For me t
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:25 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
>
> > I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a
server to
> > st
[user]
Portage
Streamlined installation -- U nstall what U want, exactly what U want
...
Did I mention Portage :).
ShawnOn 9/8/06, Mikko Ruuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Iain Buchanan wrote:> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:40 -0400, Statux wrote:> > [snip]> >> > > All responses o
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
eselect-compiler is now hard-masked, so that shouldn't be a problem any
more.
To add some balance, I've upgraded four machines, on three different
architectures, to
For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
After unmerging the package,
/etc/env.d/05compiler
file was not deleted. As a result, enviroment variables were invalid.
After deleting the file (and 'env-update' and 'source /etc/profile')
switching to 4.1.1 was seamless (
On 9/8/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
> start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
> off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
> upgrade. Ive done one so far an
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far and it took me 5 days and nearly cost me
my laptop -- a
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How much hardware leeway is safe to accept when using a source 4 tarball
for an installation?
For example, I have 2 basic models of server one is a gateway pancake
server - p4 3.0 ghz HT, about 512m of memory and 500Gb sata drives
The othe
On 9/8/06, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did some quick searches and couldn't find any ISOs for that disc, so I can make an ISO from the disc (I think it's a minimal install cd) and get it to you somehow.
I didn't look hard enough: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=install-x86-minim
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 21:40 -0400, Statux wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > All responses off list please. Thanks.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Just pointing that one out as 2 people have missed it already :)
>
> what about everyone else who might be interested
On 9/6/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the best install CD to use to get this k6-200MHz machine installed? It will not be running X so maybe an older minimal CD is more friendly to oldamd K6? maybe the x86 2006.1 liveCD is not the best choice?
Suggestions are most welcome.JamesI have so
I would call this discussion "Re-installing the system with gcc-4.1
That's what I'm doing now after more than one week of struggle ! ;-)
On 9/8/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:>>> [Timothy A. Holmes]>> I am leaving my office in a moment to put the
2006.1 disk in a serv
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
>
> I would run revdep-rebuild after the rebuild of
> world, just to be sure.
>
< snip>
> Cheers
> Marc
>
>
>
I did that too. I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the g
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
