[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 at 13:14, Ben Munat wrote:
yeah... lowered my sa_tag2_level_deflt to 4.51... see most spam
labeled at around 2 or 3... :-(
Did you also set $sa_kill_level_deflt to something higher? It is set
equal to $sa_tag2_level_deflt by default, which means tha
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 at 13:14, Ben Munat wrote:
yeah... lowered my sa_tag2_level_deflt to 4.51... see most spam labeled at
around 2 or 3... :-(
Did you also set $sa_kill_level_deflt to something higher? It is set
equal to $sa_tag2_level_deflt by default, which means that no matter
what you set s
Alex Efros schrieb:
> [..]
>
> If you remote-mount root (using network boot?), /usr and everything else ;-)
> than that's really can make life much easier, but this setup has nothing
> with current topic. I'm asking about configuration where you may boot with
> root but without /usr - that's why /
> Does anyone have any idea how to debug or fix this?
>
> - Grant
Apache and loaded module versions would be good info. Additionally I'd
start using cacti/snmp to watch system resources for tracking memory and
load. IIRC you've got at least mod_perl in there and that's the most
likely culprit in
yeah... lowered my sa_tag2_level_deflt to 4.51... see most spam labeled
at around 2 or 3... :-(
b
Craig Webster wrote:
On 8 Dec 2006, at 22:57, Ben Munat wrote:
I wasn't getting the spam headers until I set
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -100
Now I see the headers, though nothing ever seems to scor
On 8 Dec 2006, at 22:57, Ben Munat wrote:
I wasn't getting the spam headers until I set
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -100
Now I see the headers, though nothing ever seems to score a high
enough spam score to get marked as spam... And I imported my spam
db from my old server and have been training
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 at 15:15, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
At some point, my amavisd setup decided to stop checking mail for
spam. I don't get spam headers or anything in the logs indicating
it's checking for spam. It still checks for viruses using clamav
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2006 22:59, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Any suggestions for what values to check? I looked at everything in the
SpamAssassin section of amavisd.conf, but nothing stood out at me.
Did you check @local_domains_maps ?
That was what bit me last time
On Friday 08 December 2006 22:59, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Any suggestions for what values to check? I looked at everything in the
> SpamAssassin section of amavisd.conf, but nothing stood out at me.
Did you check @local_domains_maps ?
That was what bit me last time.
--
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 at 15:15, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
At some point, my amavisd setup decided to stop checking mail for
spam. I don't get spam headers or anything in the logs indicating it's
checking for spam. It still checks for viruses using clamav, however.
Also, amavi
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 at 15:15, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
At some point, my amavisd setup decided to stop checking mail for spam. I
don't get spam headers or anything in the logs indicating it's checking for
spam. It still checks for viruses using clamav, however. Also, amavisd's
configurability for S
I have been fighting on an off with amavisd-new for my mail setup at work. I use
postfix and virtual domains. I've got amavisd-new setup as described in the
Gentoo Mail Filtering Gateway Guide (or something like that), except for the
mysql config for amavisd.
At some point, my amavisd setup de
Grant wrote:
Does anyone have any idea how to debug or fix this?
- Grant
Apache and loaded module versions would be good info. Additionally I'd
start using cacti/snmp to watch system resources for tracking memory and
load. IIRC you've got at least mod_perl in there and that's the most
likel
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Alex Efros wrote:
> > - You can mount it read-only so it can't be modified
>
> Local /usr also can be mounted read-only.
And then re-mounted r/w if the box is rooted. You can enforce read-only
access on the file server independantly of the application server. In
hind-sight,
Hello,
I've been dealing with apache2 segfaults on my Gentoo system for years
now. I noticed a recent message on this list about apache segfaults
so I thought I'd give this a try.
My segfaults definitely seem to coincide with increases in traffic.
They look like this:
[Fri Dec 08 09:45:02 2006
I had this too, I fixed it but nscd continues to die periodically!
Leandro
2006/12/8, A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Peter Abrahamsen wrote:
> It'd be awesome if someone figured out why this happens. Can we make
> it dump core somehow?
I think a few times I ran it in the
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Peter Abrahamsen wrote:
> It'd be awesome if someone figured out why this happens. Can we make
> it dump core somehow?
I think a few times I ran it in the foreground in debug mode and saw an
obscure DB error of some kind right before it quit.
Ill try it again and see what the
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 02:08:29PM +, Ronan Mullally wrote:
> There are several very good reasons for using a remote-mounted /usr:
>
> - You can mount it read-only so it can't be modified
Local /usr also can be mounted read-only.
> - You can easily 're-task' a server by changing what
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Alex Efros wrote:
> AFAIK "remote /usr" idea was born many years ago, when hard drive sizes
> was too small. Nowadays this has no sense anymore.
>
> And from management/administration view sharing /usr between many
> servers isn't significantly help because most complexity in
>
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:12:51AM +0100, Christian Bricart wrote:
> > Can anybody in _this_ maillist confirm importance of "remote /usr" support?
> quoting from http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEUSRHIERARCHY
AFAIK "remote /usr" idea was born many years ago, when hard drive size
20 matches
Mail list logo
