Sylvain Alain wrote:
There a lot of threads on this list about new features, but there is no
summary of all the changes that will occur.
For the most part, the only things that have changed are the "openness" of the
release process (like the public meeting, the beta, and a few other things) an
Hi, I would like to know, if there is any documentation about the new 2008.0
profile and also for the new minimal CD and the Universal CD.
There a lot of threads on this list about new features, but there is no summary
of all the changes that will occur.
Thanks :)
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Peter Weber wrote:
>>> Anyone gave this any thought? There are still a LOT of dial-up users
>>> out here. People seem to forget that, especially the website with all
>>> the huge pages. My Space comes to mind on that.
>>>
>>
>> Even users with hig
Hi.
Peter Weber wrote:
Anyone gave this any thought? There are still a LOT of dial-up users
out here. People seem to forget that, especially the website with all
the huge pages. My Space comes to mind on that.
Even users with high-speed connections want to stay independent and
free, re
Alex Howells:
> Anyone advising you to deploy
> XFS in a production environment without
> UPS on 'critical' data is a fool.
Who, me? Not like I haven't asked for 'em. Or advised that strawman
case.
I don't know about "fool," but sometimes even a fool gets lucky...I knew
squat about XFS, it was
Alex Howells wrote:
> On 05/02/2008, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you plan to use XFS, make sure your UPS is working. In my
>> experience, it does not like power failures at all. Maybe things have
>> changed since tho.
>>
>>
>
> It uses very aggressive caching to get decent spe
On 05/02/2008, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you plan to use XFS, make sure your UPS is working. In my
> experience, it does not like power failures at all. Maybe things have
> changed since tho.
>
It uses very aggressive caching to get decent speed. Take a decent
database box with 32GB
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> run ~arch with XFS on a desktop system that doesn't have a UPS
>>
>> Guilty as charged. Running Debian unstable on XFS for years, through
>> dozens of storm blackouts, and zero data loss. Ext3 lost plenty of data
>> before we gave up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
run ~arch with XFS on a desktop system that doesn't have a UPS
Guilty as charged. Running Debian unstable on XFS for years, through
dozens of storm blackouts, and zero data loss. Ext3 lost plenty of data
before we gave up on it. Have no intention of using ext4, eithe
Hi all :P
10 matches
Mail list logo
