On 25 Aug 2015 14:38, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Trying to merge pkgs using qmerge, here is what I did:
using qmerge to install packages is not that polished atm. i keep
meaning to spend more time on it, but haven't gotten around to it.
using qmerge to uninstall packages is bullet proof now i thi
On 04 Sep 2015 12:50, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Cross building perf needs binutils libs libbfd and libiberity but cross ld
> cannot find them:
> # powerpc-g2.19-linux-gnu-ld -lbfd
> powerpc-g2.19-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find -lbfd
>
> This is because libbfd and libiberity are installed in non standa
looks good:
http://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/crossdev.git/commit/?id=70b1b4ec394ab952a5dcf2bbe2c52e9412b4
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue 29 Apr 2014 00:06:34 Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> I am interesting in support exotic arches for gentoo. As for
> sh i want play with it and join sh team, and help. But i even could not
> find place, where i can buy it. I looking for lantank, but there are no
> even in Japan. I don't want to use an
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 15:55:20 Ronny Kramer wrote:
> currently I am about to write my bachelor's thesis about how to setup an
> Microblaze Architecture with Linux support to ease lectures in low level
> coding. I've built an ready to use Linux from Scratch root filesystem
> but i want to use Gentoo as
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 21:49:24 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2014/01/30 20:12:54:
> > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 17:58:46 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > As both ARCH and ELIBC are PROFILE_ONLY vars one cannot
> > > define these in make.co
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 17:58:46 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> As both ARCH and ELIBC are PROFILE_ONLY vars one cannot
> define these in make.conf.
> Move these to etc/portage/profile/make.defaults which is part
> of the profile.
i've been thinking we should stop using the embedded profile enti
i've uploaded my binaries here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/aarch64/
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 18 January 2014 17:23:34 Jason Cooper wrote:
> Why did you leave the tuple aarch64- ?
it's the name binutils/gcc/glibc/etc... uses. don't get a choice there.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
for people wanting to get their hands dirty
first you'll want to build stuff
- make sure you sync first; a lot of work is recent
emerge --sync
- make sure you have latest crossdev
emerge '>=crossdev-20140118'
- create your cross-compiler
crossdev arm64
- update the profile
On Friday 10 January 2014 17:02:17 Jason Cooper wrote:
> Agreed. What platform (if any) are you developing/testing on?
personally i am just cross-compiling / using the reference sim right now
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 09 January 2014 12:03:52 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> originally i was going to reuse ARCH=arm for aarch64 (and that's what the
> code in the tree is doing now). however, after playing with things and
> debating it in my head, i think we should create a new ARCH=aarch64
originally i was going to reuse ARCH=arm for aarch64 (and that's what the code
in the tree is doing now). however, after playing with things and debating it
in my head, i think we should create a new ARCH=aarch64.
reasons:
- aarch64 is not a simple extension over arm at the ISA level like x86_
On Tuesday 10 December 2013 11:33:43 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> env. variables in profile.env are expanded in make.conf so
> one can use ROOT=${SYSROOT}
> ---
> wrappers/emerge-wrapper | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/wrappers/emerge-wrapper b/wrappers/emerge-wrapper
>
On Tuesday 10 December 2013 11:33:42 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> This is where make.profile belongs in current portage
thanks, i've merged this
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 10:35:01 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 02:42 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 12/18/2013 06:43 AM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> >> 18.12.2013 03:34, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> >>> i've been looking at random mips (le/64bit) bo
i've been looking at random mips (le/64bit) boards for doing development on.
what do people recommend nowadays ?
i'm thinking of grabbing a loongson laptop and something from:
http://www.imgtec.com/mips/developers/development-platforms.asp
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
On Tuesday 22 October 2013 11:19:54 chrisfri...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) using Gentoo Prefix to have a Gentoo install atop of Android. Someone
> else has already done this recently - saw it on G+). This is really the
> route for people who would still like to use their Android system but who
> would
On Tuesday 19 November 2013 08:27:44 billium wrote:
> I've been using crossdev with an STM32F100 for a while and it works
> great ... thanks to all involved.
> I'm now want to use newlib. The tuple I use is arm-none-eabi.
correct
> Is there
> anything I should put in the Makefile of the project o
On Sunday 24 November 2013 11:43:37 Marc Joliet wrote:
> The only real questions I have is if the MinGW page on the Gentoo Wiki [0]
> is in conflict with the following recommendation from the cross-compiler
> handbook [1]:
>
> "However, there are some scenarios, albeit fewer as time goes on, w
On Friday 31 May 2013 14:11:01 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> strip --strip-unneeded
doesn't removed symbols that are exported in a shared lib
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 29 April 2013 11:10:33 wireless wrote:
> On 04/27/13 20:26, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 26 April 2013 16:45:45 wireless wrote:
> >> On 04/26/13 16:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> depending on your exact needs, i might recommend a Samsung Ar
On Thursday 02 May 2013 16:27:04 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Note the KEYWORDS, installing pkgs using crossdev directly doesn't care
> about KEYWORDS
> but installing the same as binary pkgs respects KEYWORDS, a bit asymmetric
> but not a big deal
that's not really accurate. crossdev sets up keywor
On Saturday 27 April 2013 20:26:58 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2013 16:45:45 wireless wrote:
> > Note, the dev board I mentioned has SATA ports build in so you
> > can put all sorts of different HD on the dev system. Still
> > have an A15 SOC in a laptop packa
On Friday 26 April 2013 16:45:45 wireless wrote:
> On 04/26/13 16:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > depending on your exact needs, i might recommend a Samsung Arm
> > Chromebook:
> > http://dev.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-
> > dev
On Tuesday 09 April 2013 11:49:48 wireless wrote:
> I've been looking for an Arm (A15) dev board; hopefully
> to get embedded gentoo installed and working on an A15.
>
> Here is what I found:
>
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/26/samsung-launches-arndale-community-board
> /
>
> Has anyone got e
On Monday 25 March 2013 03:01:51 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to reduce glibc code size.
> It can be a way to make system smaller and minimize the impact
> of attack vectors in glibc, as in return-to-libc attack.
>
> Lets say I'm deleting the program 'mkdir', and mkdir uses a function
On Thursday 17 January 2013 05:43:09 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I just killed some processes and arrived to bare system 64MB.
> Now just sshd, bash and agetty are showing in ps aux as real processes.
> The other are kernel processes.
> The kernel is pretty lean. Should I expect 64MB as the initial system
>
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 15:46:11 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I have created a small Gentoo system. It is based on glibc.
> When it starts, I see use of 84MB and free is 33MB.
> Using 'free -m' command.
> How can I debug this issue, in order to lower the memory footprint?
run `ps aux`. find & kill all
On Friday 02 November 2012 00:19:58 Pablo Pölcher wrote:
> The CHOST I was trying to (and could finally) build for is
> «armv7m-none-eabi» (by running crossdev -t armv7m-none-eabi -s4 --ex-gdb).
> The main problem I encountered is that I couldn't get a stage1 gcc built.
> The build log would always
On Thursday 18 October 2012 18:56:20 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> The only problem with autotools and using a stage1 compiler, is that
> the macro AC_PROG_CC in configure.ac always dies because the compiler
> tries to link main to a fully-fledged executable can't find the crt
> files yet.
>
> Is th
currently, we have the system:
- if chost matches *-softfloat-*, you get softfloat
- if chost matches *-hardfloat-*, you get hardfloat
- for everything else, you get the gcc default
with the standardization work going on with armv7+ and hardfp, i've made the
following chan
On Saturday 14 April 2012 14:56:42 wireless wrote:
> How does open street map data get created and are there existing
> open source embedded boards one can buy, install in a car and help
> extend/enhance the data collected? Or, roll your own?
probably better to ask in their forums
-mike
signatu
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 12:33:02 Ed W wrote:
> Hi, I'm hitting an error when trying to unpack archives with the
> recently unmasked tar-1.26. Basically any symlinks in the archive
> trigger an "unknown file" error. This prevents me using emerge -k
> amongst other things
>
> I only see this
On Monday 19 March 2012 15:32:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i plan on deprecating the gcc-config logic to only copying to
> /lib if it detects that /usr is split.
gcc-config-1.6 does this now
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 19 March 2012 14:09:00 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2012/03/19 01:51:53:
> > On Sunday 18 March 2012 14:53:44 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > What bugs me is that one can generally use /usr/$CTARGET as your root
> > > fs on your favourit
On Sunday 18 March 2012 14:53:44 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> What bugs me is that one can generally use /usr/$CTARGET as your root fs on
> your favourite embedded target. Doing so will loose libgcc_s.so as there
> isn't one installed. Having to install gcc into /usr/$CTARGET just to get
> libgcc_s is
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 05:32:35 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2012/03/13 23:47:27:
> > On Tuesday 13 March 2012 08:43:16 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Ed W wrote on 2012/03/13 13:07:37:
> > > > On 10/03/2012 20:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 08:43:16 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Ed W wrote on 2012/03/13 13:07:37:
> > On 10/03/2012 20:58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Friday 09 March 2012 10:58:10 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > >> A "qfile /lib/libgcc_s.so.1" does not list
On Saturday 10 March 2012 16:32:31 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2012/03/10 21:58:54:
> > On Friday 09 March 2012 10:58:10 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > A "qfile /lib/libgcc_s.so.1" does not list any package,
> > > should it not belong t
On Friday 09 March 2012 10:58:10 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> A "qfile /lib/libgcc_s.so.1" does not list any package,
> should it not belong to sys-devel/gcc ?
gcc-config installs it from /usr/lib/gcc/. to /lib
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 01 March 2012 14:05:36 Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ed W wrote:
> > My understanding is that for a GPL licence one should provide a
> > copy of these patches in the "code dump", not just an http link?
> > Is that your understanding?
>
> I think your understanding is incomplete, and I recommend
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 09:46:57 Ed W wrote:
> In particular I guess simply capturing the ebuilds is not sufficient and
> it's necessary to capture and distribute all the source and patch files
> used to create a build. The emerge tool doesn't obviously give a way to
> capture this stuff.
f
On Saturday 04 February 2012 18:22:24 René Berber wrote:
> Minor bug in crossdev
bugs should be filed in bugs.gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 08 January 2012 12:59:16 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I'll need to crash proof a Gentoo system from electricity cutoffs.
> I have a system with 8GB of flash drive.
> I created a small system ~100mb as the target system.
> I thought of creating 5 200mb paratitions of raid1. So 5 will be mirrored.
>
On Monday 02 January 2012 04:09:10 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I'm now struggling connecting eclipse to debugging remote the target.
> If someone have some insight for me, I'll be happy to hear it.
http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=debuggers
http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=toolchain
FEATURES=installsources would probably get what you need by normalizing all
source trees into /usr/src/debug/.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 16:06, David Relson wrote:
> The msp430 toolchain generated is working very nicely for me and has
> been building msp430 executables for several days.
>
> With kernel config updates (to include CONFIG_USB_SERIAL,
> CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_TI, and CONFIG_USB_ACM), demo programs ar
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 14:38:20 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> someone has sent me a patch to crossdev to add msp4300 support. i'll let
> you know when i push a release with it.
crossdev-20111221 should work. if it doesn't, file a bug.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 16:24:54 René Berber wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 8:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > file a bug please
>
> Sure, no problem.
>
> Should I make it a report on emerge or the cross-emerge?
assign it to base-system@g.o and cc prefix@g.o and i'll t
someone has sent me a patch to crossdev to add msp4300 support. i'll let you
know when i push a release with it.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 03:31:37 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I am trying to create a binary package of my cross env, inkluding the
> sysroot so I can install it on all dev. machines without needing to
> rebuild everything. This is what I got so far:
>TARGET="powerpc-tmp_softfloat-linux-gnu"
>
file a bug please
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 19 December 2011 12:09:34 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I seem to recall that qlist and qfile worked on crossdev installed
> x-gcc's but now I cannot make it work.
> # > qfile /usr/powerpc-tmp_softfloat-linux-gnu/
> cross-powerpc-tmp_softfloat-linux-gnu/glibc
> (/usr/powerpc-tmp_softfloat-lin
On Friday 25 November 2011 08:05:56 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2011/11/25 07:35:45:
> > On Thursday 24 November 2011 08:13:02 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > I want to build cross powerpc gcc which supports both soft and hard
> > > float and a it
On Thursday 24 November 2011 08:13:02 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I want to build cross powerpc gcc which supports both soft and hard float
> and a its supporting libs(glibc etc.) using crossdev.
>
> searched a while on the net but I can't make out if crossdev supports this
> and how to do it so:
>
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 04:55:52 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2011/11/13 19:06:17:
> > On Saturday 12 November 2011 18:39:33 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > I guess crossdev should run binutils-config automatically?
> >
> > nah ... binutils
On Saturday 12 November 2011 18:39:33 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I guess crossdev should run binutils-config automatically?
nah ... binutils eclass itself should be doing this already in toolchain-
binutils_pkg_postinst
> BTW, somewhat offtopic but why isn't libtool-2.4.2 unstable yet?
no real re
On Friday 11 November 2011 10:47:02 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote on 2011/11/11 15:46:44:
> > On Friday 11 November 2011 03:26:22 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > I installed binutils
> > > and now I got a the correct libbfd.so and libiberty.a under
On Friday 11 November 2011 03:26:22 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I installed binutils
> and now I got a the correct libbfd.so and libiberty.a under
> /usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/usr/lib/binutils/powerpc-softfloat-linux-
> gnu/2.16.1/ There is no symlink under
> /usr/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu/
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 10:37:18 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Tried to build oprofile
> ./configure --host powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu
> LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib/binutils/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gnu
> -L/usr/local/src/FS/fsall/basicfs/usr/lib"
> CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/lib/binutils/powerpc-softfloat-linux-gn
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 10:49:23 YouTube Support wrote:
> You are receiving this automated reply because you have sent mail to
> an invalid email address. If you are trying to contact YouTube,
> please visit the YouTube Help Center at:
> http://www.google.com/support/youtube
>
> If you're un
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 05:27:32 Ed W wrote:
> > you aren't the first person to find this behavior undesirable, and when i
> > implemented it, it was more of "let's save space on things i don't think
> > anyone will use". but if people are using it, then installing these
> > things probably mak
On Friday 14 October 2011 06:11:40 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Thursday 13 October 2011 19:30:14 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> >> 2011/10/14 Mike Frysinger:
> >> > On Thursday 13 October 2011 15:15:40 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> >> >&g
On Thursday 13 October 2011 19:30:14 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Thursday 13 October 2011 15:15:40 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> >> Hello. I have my arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi system which uses glibc and
> >> busybox. Recently I realised that ico
On Saturday 10 September 2011 12:01:10 Thomas Drueke wrote:
> I haven't found a log showing the outcome of the compilation making the
> available information
> restricted somehow.
it's farily simple code. if your gcc can't build this:
int foo(int *i) {
static __thread int j = 0;
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 02:40:05 Andrew Udvare wrote:
> Most sources come from http://opensource.apple.com just like the
> sys-devel/binutils-apple and sys-devel/gcc-apple packages. The version
> of cctools in the project is patched heavily (mainly due to missing
> headers, which we can dist
On Thursday 13 October 2011 15:15:40 Sergey Mironov wrote:
> Hello. I have my arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi system which uses glibc and
> busybox. Recently I realised that iconv program doesn't exist in the
> tree. I've compared host's and target's glibc file lists and found
> that arm's version doesn'
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 03:10:53 Hanno Böck wrote:
> I'm one of the few people running Gentoo on a Toshiba AC100.
>
> Since the update to baselayout2, I'm experiencing that /sys doesn't get
> mounted on boot. When I mount /sys and restart udev afterwards,
> everything is fine again.
>
> A
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 18:14:48 John Poole wrote:
> the $400 fee that keeps me from considering attendance.
ive always been saddened by all these open source conf's that charge (high or
any) fees. we need more (any?) free ones to make it easy for anyone to come
and contribute :(.
-mike
s
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 14:15:34 Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Following on from the founding of the cross-distro ARM mailing list,
> I'd like to propose an ARM summit at this year's Linux Plumbers
> conference [1]. I'm hoping for a slot on Thursday evening, but this
> remains to be confirmed at this
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 05:59:47 Christopher Harvey wrote:
> I'm looking for a mentor so I can become a gentoo developer.
has anyone followed up yet ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 23:57, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:36, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> Of course you need to hack the init configuration, as baselayout won't
>>> work with busybox&#x
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:36, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Of course you need to hack the init configuration, as baselayout won't
> work with busybox's init
i'm not sure i follow. there's no reason that i know of that you cant
configure busybox's init to work fine with openrc. openrc itself
doesnt req
On Friday, May 27, 2011 11:47:58 Christopher Harvey wrote:
> I've been using the -emerge wrapper, and installed some
> packages that worked out great. Now I want to try a different set of
> packages. Is there a way to start over with a clean /usr/
> directory without asking crossdev to re-insta
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 17:22:23 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> So I started to add autotools to openssl, was harder than I figured and I
> didn't get too far. Anyhow I thought I post what I got so far for other to
> either work on or comment on.
i started such a project about 3 years ago, but ultimat
On Thursday, May 19, 2011 13:39:29 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, where does the symlink for
>
> sys-include -> usr/include
>
> come from?
the C library ebuild takes care of it. consult glibc/uClibc as examples.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Friday, May 13, 2011 23:02:08 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> root@localhost ~ # find /var/db/pkg -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2
if you installed portage-utils, you could use `qlist`. and if you used binary
packages, you could use `qmerge` to manage things. should be simpler than
python + emerge ...
-
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 07:13:09 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> I'm suggesting having:
> FEATURES="noheaders" ~ INSTALL_MASK="*.h" or ="/usr/include"
> FEATURES="nola" ~ INSTALL_MASK="*.la"
> ...
>
> What is your take on this?
stick to INSTALL_MASK
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 11:42:38 Sergey Gusarov wrote:
> Look at
> myconf="${myconf} -no-xkb -no-fontconfig -no-xrender -no-xrandr
> -no-xfixes -no-xcursor -no-xinerama -no-xshape -no-sm -no-opengl
> -no-nas-sound -no-dbus -iconv -no-cups -no-nis -no-gif -no-libpng
>
On Sunday, April 10, 2011 09:43:09 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Hrrmm... gnuconfig has alreaded added linux-android* upstream for
> their system types in config.sub but using 'android' as a descriptor
> for the libc really wouldn't make sense if it wasn't an Android
> system.
if that's the way upst
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Christopher Friedt wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 22:39:48 Christopher Friedt wrote:
>> put together an ebuild for bionic, add support to crossdev to mark *-bionic
>> targets to
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:52:06 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> TLS works on certain hardware (e.g. with hardware supported tls, like
> armv7a), but not on all architectures, like in GNU [1], [2]. It's
> probably better to blanket-disable this for now via a portage profile
> variable.
any arch c
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 22:39:48 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> BSD userland politics aside, I wonder what the typical steps would be
> to 'port' gentoo over to a bionic-based libc. Something like the
> following?
>
> 1) manually build a bionic cross-toolchain
> 2) do some basic verification with
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 09:45:50 wireless wrote:
> Now we only find
> http://www.rtems.com/
>
> Yet google is funding RTEMS for summer of code...
> (Strange world, huh?)
not really. make a good/relevant open source project and you can apply to
google's SOC.
-mike
signature.asc
Descri
On Sunday, April 03, 2011 09:25:52 Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > >> seems like catalyst feedback sho
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 05:47, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Joe Sapp wrote:
>>> I've got a board with no RTC so there are some problems during boot.
>>> Currently there's a hack in the udev
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Joe Sapp wrote:
> I've got a board with no RTC so there are some problems during boot.
> Currently there's a hack in the udev init script to get the time from the
> network (via ntp or rdate), but I'm wondering if somebody else has solved
> this in a better way. A
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> seems like catalyst feedback should go to the catalyst/release list.
>> not sure posting here will change anything.
>
> Yes, it is, but my interest in catalyst i
seems like catalyst feedback should go to the catalyst/release list.
not sure posting here will change anything.
-mike
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Sergey Mironov wrote:
> Hi. I'm planning to build 3 ARM filesystem trees. Since they differs
> only in softfloat and mach flags in their /etc/make.conf, I don't want
> to maintain 3 equal cross-build environments. Thats why I'm thinking
> about building only one and
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Martin Gysel wrote:
> now if I chroot into the sysroot on the second using qemu I get some
> access violations from the sandbox:
i doubt qemu handles ptrace and sandbox correctly. probably saner to
just disable sandbox when chrooting via qemu.
-mike
On Sunday, March 20, 2011 02:57:54 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday, March 19, 2011 17:21:49 Jan Kobler wrote:
> > checking whether x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -pipe -freorder-blocks -O2
> > -fno-strict-aliasing supports -mabi=ibmlongdouble... no
> > configure: error: this c
On Saturday, March 19, 2011 17:21:49 Jan Kobler wrote:
> checking whether x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -pipe -freorder-blocks -O2
> -fno-strict-aliasing supports -mabi=ibmlongdouble... no
> configure: error: this configuration requires -mlong-double-128 IBM
> extended format support
> * ERROR: cross-p
portage-utils-0.5 features a lot of updates to qmerge. things like in-place
upgrades should work now, as does execution of pkg_* functions.
it'd be great if people banged on it and started filing bugs for features they
find missing or bugs they hit. make sure to check the TODO to make sure we
On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:18:39 Martin Gysel wrote:
> I tied to use qmerge on my 'embedded' system (well for the moment it
> runs from a usb stick...). I don't have the portage tree there nor any
> profile.
the profile is necessary to convey fundamental information such as ARCH and
ACCEPT_K
On Sunday, February 13, 2011 17:28:19 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Why isn't, eg., something like AC_CHECK_LIB just a function call ?
> There could be easily one generic function that does the job on
> the given parameters and also tells the success as return value,
> so you could directly write:
you m
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 10:16:16 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> No, they aren't. They are just macros which are expanded to a big-fat
> unreable shellscript w/o any functions.
once again you show that you dont follow the projects you spend time
criticizing. autoconf has for quite some time now r
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Kfir Lavi wrote:
>> Which component in bugs.gentoo.org is related to the Gentoo Embedded
>> project?
>
> Don't think there is a specific component.
correct. just the assignees dev-embed...@g.o and embed...@g.o. the
former is more of a general
On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 17:12:58 Patrice Tisserand wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 07:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 04:02:59 Patrice Tisserand wrote:
> >> Does adding -L /tmp/target_root/lib -L /tmp/target_root/usr/lib
> >> -Wl,-rpath-link,/t
1 - 100 of 575 matches
Mail list logo
